[Bug lto/47900] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/56232] New: Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56232 Bug #: 56232 Summary: Missed optimization with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P

[Bug lto/47936] [4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO due to strict aliasing issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.7.0 |4.7.3, 4.8.0 Summa

[Bug web/56233] New: Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized as application/octet-stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233 Bug #: 56233 Summary: Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized as application/octet-stream Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug web/56233] Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized as application/octet-stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-07 02:49:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29379 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29379 "Create New Attachment" form

[Bug web/56233] Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized as application/octet-stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-07 03:34:21 UTC --- > There is not much bugzilla can do. It could either ignore mime type as sent by the browser, or show the "Content Type" section.

[Bug web/56233] Bugzilla: files (*.c, *.diff, etc.) wrongly recognized as application/octet-stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56233 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-07 03:37:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29381 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29381 "Enter Bug" form (w/o javascript)

[Bug lto/56295] New: [4.8 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295 Bug #: 56295 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug lto/56295] [4.8 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-12 11:02:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29423 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29423 Three other testcases These are unrelated testcases which also demonstrate differences b

[Bug lto/56297] New: LTO: multiple definition error with global register variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56297 Bug #: 56297 Summary: LTO: multiple definition error with global register variables Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug lto/56295] [4.8 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-02-12 16:26:39 UTC --- Created attachment 29425 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29425 Modified testcase This slightly modified testcase still shows some strange difference be

[Bug lto/56515] New: location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515 Bug #: 56515 Summary: location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug lto/56515] location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-04 05:20:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29575 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29575 Bt from 4.7.3 GCC 4.8.0 20130127 (r195497) fails, too; 20130113 (r195137) - ok. GCC 4.8

[Bug lto/56515] location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-04 05:22:09 UTC --- Created attachment 29576 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29576 Testcase

[Bug middle-end/55644] maybe-uninitialized false positive due to incorrect flow analysis when gotos are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644 --- Comment #13 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-04 05:50:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I start to believe we should arrange for --disable-werror for any non-standard > build config ... testing matrix is simply too large and mostly fa

[Bug lto/56536] New: GCC with LTO and `-march=pentium3' tries to generate SSE2 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56536 Bug #: 56536 Summary: GCC with LTO and `-march=pentium3' tries to generate SSE2 code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug middle-end/56548] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56548 Bug #: 56548 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3486 with -march=pentium{pro,2,3} -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug lto/56578] New: Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578 Bug #: 56578 Summary: Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug lto/56578] Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-12 00:46:13 UTC --- GCC 4.8.0, 4.7.3, 4.6.4; build = host = target = i686-pc-linux-gnu; configured with "--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --disable-nls --disable-s

[Bug lto/56578] Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-12 13:30:30 UTC --- > We could say the bug is in the testcase. Failing is: [...] > that's because you are providing an implementation of > malloc in libxxx.a a.o from func.c that does not have

[Bug other/56653] New: Warning when verifying checksums from MD5SUMS file in tarballs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56653 Bug #: 56653 Summary: Warning when verifying checksums from MD5SUMS file in tarballs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-26 20:12:42 UTC --- > It's not just me who concluded that wrong. Bug 55102.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] GCC produces unnecessary code on -O2 and -O3 levels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-04-12 20:34:31 UTC --- I can't reproduce the bug with GCC 4.7.3 and 4.8.1.

[Bug lto/48259] Internal compiler errors in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/54499] New: GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 Bug #: 54499 Summary: GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 St

[Bug debug/54499] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-09-06 00:03:39 UTC --- Created attachment 28139 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28139 Code generated by GCC

[Bug driver/54789] New: [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 Bug #: 54789 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/54790] New: [4.8 Regression] Missing optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790 Bug #: 54790 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missing optimization with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/54789] [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-04 09:46:45 UTC --- Created attachment 28355 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28355 Patch

[Bug driver/54789] [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian.bruel at st dot

[Bug driver/54789] [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Dm

[Bug lto/54824] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 Bug #: 54824 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug lto/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-05 11:47:19 UTC --- Created attachment 28362 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28362 Testcase GCC 20120923 (r191654) - fails, 20120916 (r191367) - ok.

[Bug lto/54790] [4.8 Regression] Missing optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-06 07:57:12 UTC --- Created attachment 28369 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28369 Testcase #2 Another (perhaps related) issue.

[Bug lto/54790] [4.8 Regression] Missing optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-06 08:02:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28370 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28370 Testcase #3 Undefined reference bug. With gold: main.o:main.c:function main: error:

[Bug tree-optimization/54877] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in copy_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:335

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877 Bug #: 54877 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in copy_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:335 Classification: Unclassified

[Bug tree-optimization/54877] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in copy_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:335

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54877 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known

[Bug tree-optimization/54824] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-10 06:13:05 UTC --- Created attachment 28409 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28409 Testcase #2 Another testcase. Compile with `-O2 -funswitch-loops' (or with `-O3'). GCC

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-11 07:06:58 UTC --- Created attachment 28417 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28417 Testcase Compile with `g++ -g -O1 -flto -flto-partition=none 1.cc 2.cc'. Another (per

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-11 07:07:51 UTC --- Created attachment 28418 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28418 Backtrace with -O0

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-11 07:08:29 UTC --- Created attachment 28419 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28419 Backtrace with -O1

[Bug tree-optimization/54981] New: [4.8 Regression] Different code generated with / without `-g'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54981 Bug #: 54981 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Different code generated with / without `-g' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug middle-end/54957] Two crashes introduced by rev192488

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957 --- Comment #15 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-23 21:16:37 UTC --- Mingw32 target, GCC 4.8.0 20121021 (experimental). $ cat > bug.cc struct S { ~S(); }; int main() { S s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s6, s7; return 0; } ^D $ g++ bug.

[Bug debug/55094] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Bug #: 55094 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Sta

[Bug lto/55102] New: The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 Bug #: 55102 Summary: The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug lto/48427] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6253

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48427 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/38226] Configure time option "--with-stabs" does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38226 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/55130] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in insn_rhs_dead_pseudo_p, at lra-constraints.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130 Bug #: 55130 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in insn_rhs_dead_pseudo_p, at lra-constraints.c:3224 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Sta

[Bug target/55126] Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-10-30 01:14:47 UTC --- A dup of PR54957 / PR55014.

[Bug middle-end/55130] [4.8 Regression] ICE in insn_rhs_dead_pseudo_p, at lra-constraints.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug preprocessor/55242] continued lines not always merged into one long line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-11-09 20:23:47 UTC --- It's a "feature", not a bug (see PR41748, PR45696, and PR48383). Perhaps it should be mentioned in the preprocessor documentation.

[Bug middle-end/46900] [4.6 Regression] 50% slowdown when linking with LTO in a single step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46900 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2010-12-17 12:13:54 UTC --- > Thus, the "-march=native" somehow gets > lost in the single-step compile. PR42445 ?

[Bug c++/40831] g++ generated symbols for cloned function that be demangled.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug lto/47183] New: Please discard unused functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47183 Summary: Please discard unused functions Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o

[Bug lto/47183] Please discard unused functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47183 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-05 22:13:55 UTC --- It's operator delete(void*). Also, typeinfo for S, typeinfo name for S, vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info are unused, too.

[Bug lto/47188] New: Undefined reference errors when combining IR and non-IR object files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188 Summary: Undefined reference errors when combining IR and non-IR object files Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug driver/42445] -march=native isn't saved in COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42445 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment #1 f

[Bug lto/47188] Undefined reference errors when combining IR and non-IR object files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-06 14:45:17 UTC --- Collect2-based LTO (when CFLAGS = -flto -fwhole-program) fails, too.

[Bug lto/47205] New: GCC emits optimized out noinline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47205 Summary: GCC emits optimized out noinline function Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug plugins/47223] Fail to build gcc 4.6.0 (r168594) on mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-08 14:01:47 UTC --- Try to configure with `--disable-shared --enable-shared=lto-plugin'.

[Bug lto/46948] [4.6 Regression] Undefined reference errors, LTO, and visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46948 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-09 17:19:54 UTC --- GCC 4.6.0 20110108 no longer fails with `-fuse-linker-plugin'. Still fails with `-fno-use-linker-plugin'.

[Bug lto/47259] New: LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 Summary: LTO and global register variable Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug lto/47259] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-11 18:47:49 UTC --- Created attachment 22948 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22948 Backtrace

[Bug tree-optimization/47265] New: [4.6 Regression] Error: SSA name in freelist but still referenced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Error: SSA name in freelist but still referenced Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug lto/47259] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-12 13:10:07 UTC --- For example, linux uses global reg var "esp". As there is no need to reserve this register, can GCC accept it?

[Bug rtl-optimization/47270] New: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces unnecessary/wrong code on -O2 and -O3 levels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270 Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces unnecessary/wrong code on -O2 and -O3 levels Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug lto/43467] LTO error "bytecode stream: trying to read 0 bytes after the end of the input buffer"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47270] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces unnecessary code on -O2 and -O3 levels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Summary

[Bug driver/47480] New: GCC driver names a resolution file after the last argument to the linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480 Summary: GCC driver names a resolution file after the last argument to the linker Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3

[Bug preprocessor/41748] Adjust documentation to reflect new (afrer rev. 152599) cpp behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41748 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/47480] GCC driver names a resolution file after the last argument to the linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-30 09:22:15 UTC --- > So, please double-check your GCC version and paste -v output. Checked recent weekly snapshot: $ i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.6.0 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-linux-gn

[Bug driver/30090] Incorrectness in `gcc.c'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30090 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-01-30 23:39:27 UTC --- $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO

[Bug driver/47547] New: WHOPR, can't use /dev/null as an output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47547 Summary: WHOPR, can't use /dev/null as an output file Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: una

[Bug driver/47785] New: GCC with -flto does not pass options to the assembler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785 Summary: GCC with -flto does not pass options to the assembler Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assigne

[Bug c/47786] New: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786 Summary: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug c/47786] tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-17 16:57:41 UTC --- Created attachment 23386 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23386 backtrace

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-17 17:02:20 UTC --- I can't reproduce this bug now.

[Bug driver/47787] New: GCC with -flto combines preprocessed C sources

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47787 Summary: GCC with -flto combines preprocessed C sources Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: un

[Bug c/47786] tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-17 17:55:42 UTC --- Thanks!

[Bug c++/40831] g++ generated symbols for cloned function that be demangled.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-23 07:53:45 UTC --- Does not work for `_Z3fooi.1988' or `_Z3fooi.part.9.165493.constprop.775.31805'.

[Bug lto/47870] New: internal compiler error: in get_alias_set, at alias.c:716

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870 Summary: internal compiler error: in get_alias_set, at alias.c:716 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug lto/47870] internal compiler error: in get_alias_set, at alias.c:716

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-24 05:33:34 UTC --- Created attachment 23446 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23446 Preprocessed source files in .tar.lz archive I tried to minimize the testcase with Delta, but unf

[Bug lto/47871] New: lto1: internal compiler error: in list_length, at tree.c:2089

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47871 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in list_length, at tree.c:2089 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug lto/47888] New: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888 Summary: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/47889] New: Segmentation fault in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889 Summary: Segmentation fault in lto1 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/47890] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1186

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47890 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1186 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/47890] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1186

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47890 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-25 01:42:56 UTC --- Created attachment 23463 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23463 Backtrace from GCC 4.5 4.5.3 also fails with `internal compiler error: in get_initial_def_for_ind

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug lto/47900] New: Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900 Summary: Missed optimization with LTO Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug lto/47889] Segmentation fault in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-27 19:54:50 UTC --- Created attachment 23485 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23485 Backtrace

[Bug lto/47888] tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6248

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-27 19:54:48 UTC --- Created attachment 23484 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23484 Backtrace

[Bug lto/47871] lto1: internal compiler error: in list_length, at tree.c:2089

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47871 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-27 19:56:55 UTC --- Still fails with GCC version 4.6.0 20110226.

[Bug lto/47900] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47900 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-27 19:57:01 UTC --- A null pointer check (... && ! &p->i) is not eliminated, notwithstanding the fact that the pointer has been dereferenced. If it is not null, bar is not called; otherwise, there is a

[Bug lto/47924] New: [4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47924 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug lto/47924] [4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47924 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-28 14:47:26 UTC --- Created attachment 23492 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23492 Generated asm

[Bug lto/47924] [4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47924 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-28 14:48:01 UTC --- Created attachment 23493 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23493 Testcase #2

[Bug c++/5026] __attribute__ ((unused) seems misdocumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5026 --- Comment #19 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-01 06:41:57 UTC --- GCC documentation has been changed. __attribute__((unused)) on labels can be used in C++ code since GCC version 4.5.0. This PR should be closed probably.

[Bug lto/47934] New: LTO: function with attribute "used" is not emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47934 Summary: LTO: function with attribute "used" is not emitted Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: u

[Bug lto/47934] LTO: function with attribute "used" is emitted under the "wrong" name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47934 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|LTO: function with |LTO: function with |

  1   2   3   4   >