http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2011-01-30 09:22:15 UTC --- > So, please double-check your GCC version and paste -v output. Checked recent weekly snapshot: $ i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.6.0 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.6.0 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.6/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-checking=yes,fold --disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) (GCC) The bug is still here. > I thought I improved the situation with > + if (infiles[i].incompiler In this case, there are no files to compile. > maybe we should just disregard "infiles" with starting '-' here > (same with -Xlinker). For example, it will not work with $ gcc -flto -Wl,--whole-archive,-lfoobar,--no-whole-archive -save-temps But it's probably something uncommon.
