[Bug debug/38101] New: dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of DECL_VALUE_EXPR()

2008-11-12 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i386-pc-mingw32

[Bug target/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 20:21 --- (In reply to comment #5) GCC 4.3.2 suffers from the same bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38054

[Bug debug/38101] dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of DECL_VALUE_EXPR()

2008-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-14 01:47 --- Example (11MB archive) - http://www.divshare.com/download/5809022-31c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38101

[Bug debug/38101] dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of DECL_VALUE_EXPR()

2008-11-18 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-19 04:37 --- Created an attachment (id=16720) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16720&action=view) Example Disregard the previous comment. Segmentation fault in GCC. -- http://gcc.

[Bug debug/38226] New: Configure time option "--with-stabs" does not work

2008-11-22 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i386-pc-mingw32 http://

[Bug target/38269] Segmentation fault in main_block_label when using -fno-unit-at-a-time and precompiled headers containing inline functions

2008-11-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 00:00 --- GCC 4.3.2 failed to compile the testcase with "internal compiler error: in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1227" or "internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6146"

[Bug target/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 00:14 --- GCC 4.3.2 and 4.4.0 compile the above testcase without warnings. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38054

[Bug middle-end/38271] New: Spurious / missing "... used uninitialized in this function" warning

2008-11-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
function" warning Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at

[Bug middle-end/38271] Spurious / missing "... used uninitialized in this function" warning

2008-11-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 02:48 --- Created an attachment (id=16772) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16772&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38271

[Bug debug/38226] Configure time option "--with-stabs" does not work

2008-11-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 05:14 --- The same thing with GCC 4.3.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38226

[Bug pch/38101] dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of DECL_VALUE_EXPR()

2008-11-29 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 13:08 --- Hash table entries should be reordered when writing a PCH. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/38426] New: Incorrect code produced with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time

2008-12-06 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i386-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38426

[Bug middle-end/38426] Incorrect code produced with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time

2008-12-06 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-12-06 09:52 --- Created an attachment (id=16839) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16839&action=view) Preprocessed source mingw32-gcc -S -Os -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time win

[Bug middle-end/38271] [4.4 Regression] Spurious / missing "... used uninitialized in this function" warning

2008-12-08 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-12-08 20:34 --- (In reply to comment #7) The patch causes segfault. This is how it happens: tree-sra.c:1612 for (f = TYPE_FIELDS (elt->type); f; f = TREE_CHAIN (f)) { tree-sra.c:1700 if (s

[Bug middle-end/38426] Incorrect code produced with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time

2008-12-08 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-12-09 01:11 --- Ira() calls setup_eliminable_regset() at ira.c:1794, which calls ix86_frame_pointer_required() at ira.c:1296, which checks current_function_is_leaf, but this variable is updated only at ira.c:1866

[Bug rtl-optimization/38426] Incorrect code produced with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time

2008-12-09 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-12-09 20:31 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00583.html -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/38426] [4.4 Regression] Incorrect code produced with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time

2009-01-07 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 16:01 --- > sorry for the duplicate work. Thanks for fixing it! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38426

[Bug target/38900] New: ICE: unable to find a register to spill

2009-01-17 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
a register to spill Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC bu

[Bug target/38900] ICE: unable to find a register to spill

2009-01-17 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-01-17 23:19 --- bug.c: void __attribute__((dllimport,fastcall)) h(int); void f(int i) { static void (__attribute__((fastcall)) *g)(int) = h; g(i); g(i); } -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug target/38900] ICE: unable to find a register to spill

2009-01-17 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-01-17 23:20 --- ok.c: void __attribute__((dllimport,fastcall)) h(int); void f(int i) { static void (__attribute__((fastcall)) *g)(int); g = h; g(i); g(i); } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug middle-end/40493] [4.5 Regression] New SRA miscompiled binutils

2009-06-22 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 10:05 --- This is probably the same bug: binutils 2.19.51.20090616 (build, host: i686-pc-linux-gnu, target: i686-pc-mingw32), compiled with GCC 4.5.0 20090618. GAS aborts when tries to assemble this instruction

[Bug c++/40535] New: Invalid conversion from 'T' to 'T' error when compiling C++ code

2009-06-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
mpiling C++ code Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com G

[Bug target/38900] ICE: unable to find a register to spill

2009-06-26 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-06-26 14:57 --- Perhaps there are two bugs, not one, as my more elaborate testcases show. Though they are seemingly equivalent, one triggers the bug, while another don't. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug c++/40535] Invalid conversion from 'T' to 'T' error when compiling C++ code

2009-06-30 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-06-30 09:18 --- Created an attachment (id=18098) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18098&action=view) Another testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40535

[Bug target/40636] New: Build failed with --enable-build-with-cxx (mingw32 target)

2009-07-03 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
gorbachev at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40636

[Bug middle-end/40716] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323

2009-07-10 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
sion: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i68

[Bug middle-end/40716] [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323

2009-07-10 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-07-10 21:30 --- Maybe a duplicate of PR39886 / PR40364. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40716

[Bug middle-end/40717] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323

2009-07-10 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
sion: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i68

[Bug middle-end/40718] New: Invalid code produced with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2009-07-10 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
oduct: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug middle-end/39886] [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2274

2009-07-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-07-11 21:55 --- See also bug 40716. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39886

[Bug middle-end/39886] [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2274

2009-07-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-07-11 21:55 --- *** Bug 40716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/40716] [4.5 Regression] ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323

2009-07-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-07-11 21:55 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39886 *** -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/40923] bootstrap failure for 20090730 with --enable-build-with-cxx

2009-08-07 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-08-07 19:25 --- Keywords: mangling, anonymous namespaces. Adding option such as -frandom-seed=271828 to CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET allows to bootstrap. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What

[Bug middle-end/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-07 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-07 18:45 --- Created an attachment (id=16632) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16632&action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38054

[Bug middle-end/38054] New: Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-07 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i386-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38054

[Bug target/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-09 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-09 11:30 --- (In reply to comment #3) Ok, thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38054

[Bug tree-optimization/36054] bad code generation with -ftree-vectorize

2009-02-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #21 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-02-13 15:25 --- Created an attachment (id=17293) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17293&action=view) precompiled source The same issue with GCC 4.3.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu). C sourc

[Bug c++/39823] New: GCC 4.4.0 produces bad code for libstdc++

2009-04-20 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triple

[Bug c++/39823] GCC 4.4.0 produces bad code for libstdc++

2009-04-20 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-04-20 19:26 --- Created an attachment (id=17657) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17657&action=view) Preprocessed source g++ -S -std=gnu++0x -O1 string-inst.cc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug tree-optimization/36054] bad code generation with -ftree-vectorize

2009-04-20 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #22 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-04-20 19:31 --- (In reply to comment #21) Sorry, it seems it's because of malloc(), not a GCC bug... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36054

[Bug c++/39823] GCC 4.4.0 produces bad code for libstdc++

2009-04-20 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-04-20 21:24 --- For example, a ppl-0.10.2 test numberinput1 crashed because of this. std::string::begin() is called at src/checked.cc:171 for (i = num.mantissa.begin(); ... -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/39823] GCC 4.4.0 produces bad code for libstdc++

2009-04-21 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-04-21 12:24 --- (In reply to comment #4) Sorry, my mistake. The problem indeed was in the caller because of different compiler flags. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/41214] New: [4.5 regression] Null pointer dereferenced in _Unwind_SetGR()

2009-09-01 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug c++/41214] [4.5 regression] Null pointer dereferenced in _Unwind_SetGR()

2009-09-02 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-02 17:24 --- a testcase: int main(void) { try { throw 0; } catch (int) { } return 0; } About analysis, it will take some time. I think it is better to file a bug right away then to wait results. -- http

[Bug c++/41214] [4.5 regression] Null pointer dereferenced in _Unwind_SetGR()

2009-09-02 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-03 06:51 --- Created an attachment (id=18469) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18469&action=view) Patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41214

[Bug c++/41214] [4.5 regression] Null pointer dereferenced in _Unwind_SetGR()

2009-09-05 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 20:26 --- Hi, Configure and build GCC with ../gcc-4.5/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ \ --disable-shared --disable-bootstrap make CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-O3 The -O3 option, or -finline-functions -finline-small

[Bug c++/41214] [4.5 regression] Null pointer dereferenced in _Unwind_SetGR()

2009-09-05 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 22:48 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg00415.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41214

[Bug other/41338] New: High memory consumption when compiling with -O3 -g

2009-09-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41338

[Bug other/41338] High memory consumption when compiling with -O3 -g

2009-09-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-11 17:53 --- Created an attachment (id=18565) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18565&action=view) gzipped preprocessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41338

[Bug other/41340] New: [4.5 Regression] G++ produces different code with and without -g option

2009-09-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
tatus: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i6

[Bug other/41340] [4.5 Regression] G++ produces different code with and without -g option

2009-09-11 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-11 21:33 --- Created an attachment (id=18567) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18567&action=view) gzipped preprocessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41340

[Bug other/41338] High memory consumption when compiling with -O3 -g

2009-10-09 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 18:19 --- (In reply to comment #2) Ok, thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41338

[Bug lto/41652] New: LTO plugin misconfiguration

2009-10-10 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
: LTO plugin misconfiguration Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug debug/41340] [4.5 Regression] G++ produces different code with and without -g option

2009-10-16 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 20:09 --- There is a real difference, i.e. - 179: mov0x8(%ebp),%edx - 17c: movzwl (%edx),%eax + 179: mov0x8(%ebp),%esi + 17c: movzwl (%esi),%eax [...] - 1a0: mov%edx,(%esp) - 1a3: mov%edx

[Bug debug/41340] [4.5 Regression] G++ produces different code with and without -g option

2009-10-16 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 20:12 --- Created an attachment (id=18813) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18813&action=view) gzipped preprocessed source file Another case. Compile with: cc1 -O3 -march=i686 -g tr

[Bug c/40033] [4.5 regression] ICE with invalid statement expression

2009-10-16 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 21:57 --- Created an attachment (id=18814) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18814&action=view) testcase A similar problem: bug.cc: In function 'void f()': bug.cc:5:20: error: &

[Bug lto/41652] LTO plugin misconfiguration

2009-10-17 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-17 14:38 --- Patch: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01129.html>. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41652

[Bug preprocessor/41748] New: Continued lines are not merged into one long line

2009-10-19 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
he following line is joined with the current one." -- Summary: Continued lines are not merged into one long line Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug preprocessor/41748] Adjust documentation to reflect new (afrer rev. 152599) cpp behavior

2009-10-19 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 13:17 --- Ok, thanks for the clarification. I believe this should be documented. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/41806] New: G++ fails to compile a testcase with -fcompare-debug

2009-10-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
testcase with -fcompare-debug Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC

[Bug debug/41340] [4.5 Regression] GCC produces different code with and without -g option

2009-10-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-23 09:15 --- The original testcase still fails with -fcompare-debug with GCC 4.5.0 20091022. This bug is now tracked here: bug 41806. The second bug is indeed fixed. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug lto/41652] LTO plugin misconfiguration

2009-10-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-10-27 22:05 --- Fixed. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/42037] New: "grow domain error" in lto1

2009-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://g

[Bug lto/42037] "grow domain error" in lto1

2009-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 23:52 --- Created an attachment (id=19013) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19013&action=view) Testcase gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin chew.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug lto/42037] "grow domain error" in lto1

2009-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 23:53 --- Created an attachment (id=19014) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19014&action=view) Backtrace gcc version 4.5.0 20091112 (experimental) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug c++/42038] New: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p

2009-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42038

[Bug c++/42038] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p

2009-11-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 01:31 --- Created an attachment (id=19015) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19015&action=view) The bug.cc file Sorry, forgot it. :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42038

[Bug target/40535] [4.5 regression] Invalid conversion from 'T' to 'T' error when compiling C++ code

2009-11-14 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 23:35 --- GCC 4.5.0 20091112 -- works. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/43057] New: [LTO] fold check: original tree changed by fold

2010-02-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug lto/43057] [LTO] fold check: original tree changed by fold

2010-02-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-13 14:27 --- Created an attachment (id=19857) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19857&action=view) Backtrace -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057

[Bug lto/43057] [LTO] fold check: original tree changed by fold

2010-02-13 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-13 14:29 --- Created an attachment (id=19858) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19858&action=view) Testcase gcc -O -flto bug.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057

[Bug other/43090] Why gcc can't invoke -as and uses 'as' instead?

2010-02-16 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-16 13:25 --- > Except from the fact this 'as' is not symlinked but copied It must be hardlinked, not copied, on the systems which support hard links. > The fact that the toolchain has various such inte

[Bug lto/43157] New: Segmentation fault in aggregate_value_p

2010-02-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157

[Bug lto/43157] Segmentation fault in aggregate_value_p

2010-02-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-24 00:01 --- Created an attachment (id=19942) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19942&action=view) Testcase gcc -O1 -flto pr43157.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157

[Bug tree-optimization/43159] New: Missing optimization

2010-02-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43159

[Bug tree-optimization/43159] Missing optimization

2010-02-23 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-24 07:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19943) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19943&action=view) Testcase $ gcc -c -O3 -march=pentium4 -mfpmath=sse pr43159.c $ nm -u pr43159.o

[Bug lto/42453] Assertion `syms' failed in lto-plugin

2010-02-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 02:46 --- Created an attachment (id=19964) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19964&action=view) Testcase Yet another thing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42453

[Bug tree-optimization/43186] New: A loop in tree_unroll_loops_completely never ends

2010-02-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43186

[Bug tree-optimization/43186] A loop in tree_unroll_loops_completely never ends

2010-02-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-26 04:29 --- Created an attachment (id=19965) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19965&action=view) Testcase gcc -S -O3 -DBUG pr43186.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43186

[Bug tree-optimization/43188] New: [4.5 Regression] "error: alignment of array elements is greater than element size"

2010-02-25 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43188

[Bug preprocessor/43195] New: #pragma once and -H

2010-02-26 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Summary: #pragma once and -H Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/43186] [4.5 Regression] A loop in tree_unroll_loops_completely never ends

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 10:17 --- Thanks! But it still does not work when "a < 3" is replaced by "a < 4". Also, the original testcase requires much time to compile. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com

[Bug lto/43200] New: [LTO] tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Summary: [LTO] tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at

[Bug lto/43201] New: Missed optimization with `-flto'

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43201

[Bug lto/43201] Missed optimization with `-flto'

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 21:04 --- Created an attachment (id=19978) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19978&action=view) Code produced by lto1 Compiled with `-O2 -flto' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug lto/43201] Missed optimization with `-flto'

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 21:05 --- Created an attachment (id=19979) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19979&action=view) Code compiled without `-flto' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43201

[Bug lto/43201] Missed optimization with `-flto'

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 21:06 --- Created an attachment (id=19980) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19980&action=view) C source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43201

[Bug tree-optimization/43186] [4.5 Regression] A loop in tree_unroll_loops_completely never ends

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 22:11 --- > Well, it really only requires much time and memory to compile, > it's not never ending ;) Ah, it means that machine is old. Also, the generated code is larger then what gcc 4.3 does (4.4

[Bug middle-end/43204] New: GCC 4.4 / 4.5 generates larger code for a particular testcase

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linu

[Bug middle-end/43204] GCC 4.4 / 4.5 generates larger code for a particular testcase

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 23:01 --- Created an attachment (id=19982) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19982&action=view) Output of GCC 4.3 --- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27

[Bug middle-end/43204] GCC 4.4 / 4.5 generates larger code for a particular testcase

2010-02-27 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 23:01 --- Created an attachment (id=19982) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19982&action=view) Output of GCC 4.3 --- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-27

[Bug lto/43208] New: lto1: error: invalid conversion in return statement

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
tus: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-

[Bug lto/43208] lto1: error: invalid conversion in return statement

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 11:40 --- Created an attachment (id=19985) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19985&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43208

[Bug lto/43212] New: [LTO] error: control flow in the middle of basic block

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linu

[Bug tree-optimization/43213] New: [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213

[Bug tree-optimization/43213] [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 19:57 --- Created an attachment (id=19990) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19990&action=view) Poor code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213

[Bug tree-optimization/43213] [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2

2010-02-28 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-02-28 19:58 --- Created an attachment (id=19991) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19991&action=view) C source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213

[Bug lto/43218] New: [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE

2010-03-01 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu G

[Bug lto/43218] [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE

2010-03-01 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 12:43 --- Created an attachment (id=19995) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19995&action=view) Three testcases Compile with `-flto -O2' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218

[Bug lto/42451] 'warning: type of "array" does not match original declaration' with -flto/-fwhopr

2010-03-01 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 12:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19996) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19996&action=view) Another testcase Compile with `gcc -flto 1.c 2.c' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

  1   2   >