https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #36 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #35)
> I am trying to build 4.9.4 with a patched 4.7.4 and am running into the
> following failure:
> /opt/build/china/gcc-4.9.4/.obj/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/opt/build/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #37 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #36)
> I can build 4.9.3 on HP-UX 11.31/IA but not 4.9.4. So, looks like something
> changed to break the build in 4.9.4.
I reverted the patch for PR60465 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
The Written Word changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #49 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #48)
> I suggest filing a new bug report with details of what/how does not compile
> anymore. Perhaps it's easy to tweak.
Ok.
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I tried building gcc-5.5.0 on AIX 5.2 and 5.3 as follows:
$ gtar Jxf gcc-5.5.0.tar.xz
$ cd gcc-5.5.0
$ mkdir .obj
$ cd .obj
$ PATH=/opt/TWWfsw/gcc49/bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86630
--- Comment #1 from The Written Word
---
AIX 6.1 exhibits a similar error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553
--- Comment #13 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 44406 [details]
> > Undefine macros for long double math functions
> >
> > Does thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86559
--- Comment #4 from The Written Word
---
gcc-7.3.0 exhibits the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553
--- Comment #14 from The Written Word
---
Adding -bnoquiet to the linker command-line I get:
(ld): halt 4
(ld): setopt r/o->w
(ld): setopt nortl
(ld): setopt nortllib
(ld): setopt symbolic:-1
(ld): setfflag 4
(ld): savename ./shr.o
(ld): fileli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86630
--- Comment #3 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> GCC assumes that inttypes.h contains PRIx64
It does. gcc/system.h has:
/* Define this so that inttypes.h defines the PRI?64 macros even
when compiling wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #2 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #1)
> I get a similar error with 8.1.0.
And with 5.5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663
The Written Word changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #3 from The Written Word
---
6.4.0 and 7.3.0 exhibit the same error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
The Written Word changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.2.0 |8.1.0
--- Comment #4 from The Written
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #5 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #4)
> On HP-UX 11.23/PA, this isn't an issue because of the following in
> fixincludes/inclhack.def:
> /*
> * HP-UX long_double
> */
> fix = {
> hackname
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #7 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> This looks like a target issue. Have you ever build gcc on HP-UX 11.31/PA?
Definitely a target issue. With some patches I can build gcc 4.x on 11.31/P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553
--- Comment #15 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 3
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3&action=edit
gcc/config/rs6000/aix53.h patch
Similar to r227907 but for AIX 5.3 Have used this to successfully build
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553
--- Comment #16 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44455
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44455&action=edit
gcc/config/rs6000/aix53.h for gcc-6.4.0
Needed this patch to build 6.4.0 successfully on AIX 5.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86553
--- Comment #17 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44456&action=edit
gcc/config/rs6000/aix53.h patch for gcc-5.5.0
Needed this patch to build 5.5.0 successfully on AIX 5.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #10 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> It would help to see the uses of long_double in stdlib.h.
/usr/include/stdlib.h has:
# ifndef _LONG_DOUBLE
#define _LONG_DOUBLE
# if !defined(__i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #11 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44528
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44528&action=edit
stdlib.h long_double patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #12 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #11)
> Created attachment 44528 [details]
> stdlib.h long_double patch
My first attempt but it didn't work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #13 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #10)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> > It would help to see the uses of long_double in stdlib.h.
>
> /usr/include/stdlib.h has:
>
> # ifn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #14 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #13)
> (In reply to The Written Word from comment #10)
> > (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> > > It would help to see the uses of long_double in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #16 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44529
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44529&action=edit
stdlib.h long_double patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #17 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #16)
> Created attachment 44529 [details]
> stdlib.h long_double patch
This is the patch I came up with. What do you think?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #19 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #18)
> On 2018-08-12 8:10 AM, bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com wrote:
> > This is the patch I came up with. What do you think?
>
> Did you c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #20 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44536
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44536&action=edit
stdlib.h long_double patch for HP-UX 11.31/PA
Tested against 7.3.0 and 8.2.0.
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24345
--- Comment #1 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-13
05:10 ---
BTW, the MIPSpro compiler is 7.4.3m and the build system is IRIX 6.5.26m.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24345
mary: xnmake SIGSEGV
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build tr
.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23
GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux1
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23
GCC host triplet
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-14
05:23 ---
Looking at the section headers for one of the object files:
$ elfdump -h .libs/allocator-inst.o
.libs/allocator-inst.o:
SECTION HEADER TABLE
[No] Type Addr
--- Comment #3 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-14
05:38 ---
This might be a GNU as bug. I'm going to ping the binutils folks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24345
--- Comment #4 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-14
20:23 ---
Ok, not a binutils bug. Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> provided
the solution. If GNU as is used with GNU ld, COMDAT group should be supported
on this platform. However, if GNU as is used with M
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
GCC host triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
GCC target triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24388
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: alphaev5-dec-osf4.0d
GCC host triplet: alphaev5-dec-osf4.0d
GCC target triplet: alphaev5-dec-osf4.0d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24391
--- Comment #14 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-22
13:40 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Workaround patch here:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00930.html
> >
> > Rest of discussion here:
> >
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-23
16:36 ---
$ nm /usr/lib/libcl.a | egrep 'U_IS_STUB_OR_CALLX|U_is_shared_pc'
U_IS_STUB_OR_CALLX | |undef |code |
U_IS_STUB_OR_CALLX | 572|extern|entry |$CODE$
U_is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #5 from The Written Word
---
4.9.3 exhibits the same problem on 11.23/IA and 11.31/IA.
: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I tried building gcc-7.2.0 on Solaris 10/SPARC and get the following:
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/opt/build/china/gcc-7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82688
--- Comment #3 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
> The search button is your friend.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 81926 ***
Oops, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663
--- Comment #3 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #2)
> Group Bull, Perzl, and I have been able to build it. Are you using an up to
> date AIX Assembler?
Hmm. Let me try upgrading. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #19 from The Written Word
---
The latest linker patch for HP-UX 11.23/IA is PHSS_44401 and the latest for
HP-UX 11.31/IA is PHSS_44402. Both are dated 2015/10/24.
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I tried building gcc-4.9.3 on AIX 7.1 as follows:
$ gtar jxf gcc-4.9.3.tar.bz2
$ cd gcc-4.9.3
$ mkdir .obj
$ cd .obj
$ PATH=/opt/TWWfsw/gcc44/bin:$PATH LDR_CNTRL=MAXDATA
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36933&action=edit
libgcc config.log
I tried building gcc-4.7.4 on AIX 5.2 as follows:
$ gtar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #21 from The Written Word
---
I built gcc-4.7.4 with the change to gcc/config/ia64/hpux.h of "#undef
MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY" and just tried building gcc-4.8.5. Is anyone else seeing
this when trying to build libgomp:
/opt/build/gcc-4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #23 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Alexander from comment #22)
> I tried using libgomp but is the same as your error has occurred.
> After that , I only used libgmp, libmpc and libmpfr ( in the GCC source tree
> ) .
How do y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #26 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Alexander from comment #25)
> ../gcc-4.8.5/configure \
> --enable-languages=c,c++
> --prefix=/import/home/nskdvlp/CC_Libs/CC/ia64-hp-hpux_11.31_-64 \
> --with-local-prefix=/usr/CC/ia64-hp-hp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #27 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John Buddery from comment #24)
> You can use --disable-libgomp in the configure command, I had to do this on
> my HP builds.
I rebuilt without --disable-libgomp and get:
/opt/build/gcc-4.8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #29 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to Alexander from comment #28)
> this one file should recompile with -O1 optimization
Thanks. I rebuilt with charset.c with -O1 and it compiled. I resumed the build
and the compile now fails w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #30 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #29)
> (In reply to Alexander from comment #28)
> > this one file should recompile with -O1 optimization
>
> Thanks. I rebuilt with charset.c with -O1 and it c
t gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0
GCC host triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0
GCC target triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46967
Summary: lots of testsuite failures with libgomp on
hppa-hp-hpux11.31
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
GCC build triplet: ia64-hp-hpux11.31
GCC host triplet: ia64-hp-hpux11.31
GCC target triplet: ia64-hp-hpux11.31
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44655
--- Comment #1 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2010-07-02
01:40 ---
Regenerating gengtype-lex.c with an older flex allows bootstrap to complete.
Thanks to Steve Ellcey for pointing this out. He also notes that current
mainline works for him with newer flex, so this bug
--- Comment #9 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2007-12-21
03:59 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The issue is whether to default G++ to _LARGE_FILES, as is done for Fortran,
> and perform all libstdc++ I/O as 64-bit operations, which will affect
> performance. Not
--- Comment #11 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2007-12-21
19:14 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: AIX g++ -D_LARGE_FILES fails to compile #include
>
> xlC has its own system header files. G++ needs to use the AIX
> system header files
--- Comment #13 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2007-12-21
23:25 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> If AIX G++ users are focussing on 64-bit apps and large files, I'm willing to
> switch the default to _LARGE_FILES. The changes would be in
> gcc/config/rs6000/a
--- Comment #18 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2007-12-31
19:39 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Because it is not currently possible to build an autoconf based project on aix
> with gcc without doing --disable-largefile, we would like to see this fixed.
More accu
--- Comment #17 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-06-09
16:23 ---
This bug is fixed in opensolaris:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6685125
Fixed in revision 6388:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=&defs=&refs=&path=&h
--- Comment #3 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-22
23:43 ---
Any plans to add _LARGE_FILES support to g++/libstdc++ for AIX?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20366
'GR%, % in 1 -
127' (impliedf), specific resource number is 14
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
00:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=10893)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10893&action=view)
.s file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
00:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=10894)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10894&action=view)
.i file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #4 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
01:38 ---
$ /opt/TWWfsw/gcc343/ia64-hp-hpux11.23/bin/as --version
GNU assembler 2.16
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU
--- Comment #5 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
01:39 ---
Looking at gas/Changelog between 2.16 and 2.16.1, I see:
2005-05-19 Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/tc-ia64.c (dot_endp): Don't use global symbol for unwind
rel
--- Comment #6 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10896)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10896&action=view)
.s file (gcc-4.0.2 with as 2.16.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #7 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=10897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10897&action=view)
.i file (gcc-4.0.2 with as 2.16.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #8 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
02:41 ---
gcc-4.0.2 with either as 2.16/2.16.1 generates no warning.
gcc-3.4.3 with either as 2.16/2.16.1 generates the warning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #10 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-23
03:02 ---
Sure. It might take a few days.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
--- Comment #11 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2006-02-24
22:03 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Can you try 3.4.5?
Same problem as 3.4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26436
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 01:54 ---
The patch below, somewhat similar to the patch in the original message with the
workaround, does *not* work. The only difference between the two is where "int
i;" is placed.
-
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 01:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=7815)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7815&action=view)
.ii file using the original workaround patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 01:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=7816)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7816&action=view)
.s file using the original workaround patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7815|text/plain |application/octet-stream
mime type||
Attachment #7815 is|1
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 01:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=7817)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7817&action=view)
.ii file using patch in comment #1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 01:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=7818)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7818&action=view)
.s file using patch in comment #1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 02:03 ---
Ok, I ran diff on both .s files (id #7816 v id #7818) and found the following:
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@
cmp %g1, 0
bne .LL9
nop
- add %fp, -80, %g1
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 02:04 ---
Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 02:59 ---
I looked at the .s files more closely and comment #7 might be off. Offsets seem
to differ by either 4 or 8 not only 8 like I originally thought. I generated the
.s files on HP-UX and it had the same
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 07:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=7820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7820&action=view)
Original pre-processed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 07:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=7821)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7821&action=view)
Original pre-processed .s file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 07:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=7822)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7822&action=view)
Pre-processed source with fix (add "int i;")
Note: If the 'int i;'
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 07:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=7823)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7823&action=view)
Pre-processed .s of kurlcompletion.ii with fix ("int i;" added)
--
h
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 08:45 ---
gcc-3.3.2 exhibits the same problem. Maybe I'm wrong?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 17:18 ---
Cannot test mailing because of an ICE while building qt-3.3.2 with -g.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
failed
--
Summary: ICE: gimplification failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bu
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 17:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=7825)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7825&action=view)
.ii file of source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 17:34 ---
Oops, "mailing" in comment #17 should be "mainline".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-12-24 18:50 ---
Ok, found the real problem. I was wrong. This is not a GCC bug. It is a KDE bug.
On Solaris and IRIX, struct dirent does not contain space for the name of the
file. Tru64 UNIX, HP-UX, and GNU/Linux
erity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
GCC host triplet: powerpc-
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-11-29 16:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=7634)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7634&action=view)
Patch for gcc-3.3.2 to make collect2 honor -brtl
Patch reorders the library search
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-11-29 16:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=7635)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7635&action=view)
Forward-ported patch for gcc-3.4.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2004-11-29 17:01 ---
I'll try and get to it soonish.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
The Written Word changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #14 from The Written Word
---
We backported this patch to gcc-4.7.4 which we used to bootstrap gcc-5.4.0 on
HP-UX/IA. We seem to get farther than before in building gcc-5.4.0 though the
build still fails for what appears are reasons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #16 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #15)
> Steve Ellcey used to support HP-UX/IA64 but he moved on to MIPS. Don't
> know Jim Wilson's status.
I emailed them both. Maybe they can point me to a n
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
