[Bug c/66208] macro location not detected

2016-01-13 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/43052] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

2016-01-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/57193] [4.9/5/6 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for SSE registers

2016-01-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/66992] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect array subscript is above bounds warning

2016-01-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66992 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.9/5/6 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

2016-01-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5/6 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

2016-01-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/43052] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

2016-01-18 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47122] vax-*-openbsd* configuration purports to require openbsd-pthread.h

2016-01-18 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47122 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/47992] ICE: SIGSEGV in ira_reuse_stack_slot (ira-color.c:2887) with -fweb

2016-01-19 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66178] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Another label as values ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1059

2016-01-19 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/47122] vax-*-openbsd* configuration purports to require openbsd-pthread.h

2016-01-20 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47122 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

2016-01-20 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 47122, which changed state. Bug 47122 Summary: vax-*-openbsd* configuration purports to require openbsd-pthread.h https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47122 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/66178] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Another label as values ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1059

2016-01-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Jan 21 18:10:03 2016 New Revision: 232689 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232689&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR66178, ICE due to misexpansion of constant expressions involving la

[Bug middle-end/66178] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Another label as values ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1059

2016-01-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69376] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-01-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69376 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/69376] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-01-22 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69376 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt --- Why not put this bit into range_info_def so as to not have the information scattered across two different places? Seems like it would be more robust and more readable.

[Bug target/63681] ICE in cfg_layout_initialize, at cfgrtl.c:4233

2016-01-22 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63681 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63681] ICE in cfg_layout_initialize, at cfgrtl.c:4233

2016-01-22 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63681 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Jan 22 14:49:22 2016 New Revision: 232730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232730&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport PR63681 fix PR target/63681 * cfgrtl.c (cfg_lay

[Bug rtl-optimization/44281] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Global Register variable pessimisation

2016-01-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/60410] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

2016-01-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/45216] Rotate expressions not recognized at tree level

2016-01-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45216 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt --- It looks like a patch was committed - can this be closed?

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [4.9/5/6 Regression] redundant && || not eliminated

2016-01-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2016-01-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/66620] bfin: bfin.c: (hwloop_optimize): gcc_assert (JUMP_P (insn)) fails.

2015-07-06 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Jul 6 12:49:26 2015 New Revision: 225453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225453&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix assert caused by bad cfg manipulation in bfin. PR target/66

[Bug target/47779] Problem cross-compiling trunk for bfin

2011-03-10 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/44606] Wrong SPE floating point during computation

2011-03-16 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44606 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

2011-04-01 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-02 12:33:33 UTC --- Tried on Gentoo yesterday, now on Ubuntu 10.04. Still not reproduced. How do the files differ? Would anyone be willing to help debug this?

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-02 13:43:19 UTC --- Downloading Fedora 14 now, but that'll take a while to get set up. Potentially helpful would be scheduling dumps from stage1 and stage2 compilers for these files; use "-da -fsched-ve

[Bug rtl-optimization/44374] Hoist same instructions in different branches

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44374 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #21 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-03 00:10:06 UTC --- Okay, the problem showed up on Fedora 14 (no idea why only there). The bug is that I've missed some uses of last_scheduled_insn. Will probably be able to post a fix on Monday.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #39 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-04 22:27:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) > Confirmed. Reduced testcase for -O2: > > typedef __builtin_va_list va_list; > > extern void exit (unsigned); > extern int vfprintf (void *s, const char

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

2011-04-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #45 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-05 22:19:21 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Apr 5 22:19:17 2011 New Revision: 172006 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172006 Log: PR bootstrap/48403 * haifa-sched.c (sched

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

2011-04-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-05 22:41:07 UTC --- Created attachment 23890 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23890 Potential fix. Please test this patch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

2011-04-06 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-06 17:28:43 UTC --- Any chance you can run the testsuite before/after the patch? m68k is problematic due to lack of a simulator.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

2011-04-07 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23890|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

2011-04-07 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-07 15:35:34 UTC --- >From the test results you posted, it appears to have been +WARNING: program timed out. +FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-double.c -O2 -flto execution test Probably unrelated.

[Bug middle-end/47976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi

2011-04-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15 12:10:54 UTC --- Ramana, it looks like I'm running out of time to test this properly before I disappear for a few weeks. Can you give this a proper ARM test run and commit if it's urgent?

[Bug target/48629] ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with -fsched-pressure

2011-04-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15 23:32:58 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Apr 15 23:32:55 2011 New Revision: 172525 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172525 Log: PR target/48629 * haifa-sched.c (prune_rea

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

2011-05-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-04 20:24:19 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Wed May 4 20:24:15 2011 New Revision: 173393 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173393 Log: PR rtl-optimization/47612 * df-problems.c

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

2011-05-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

2011-05-06 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-06 12:09:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Or schedule_block could have a mode of preserving the existing insn order, > which can also be useful for testing purposes. If this sounds like an > overkil

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

2010-09-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-27 09:32:14 UTC --- Looking at it now.

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

2010-09-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445 --- Comment #22 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-27 12:45:36 UTC --- Thanks, that's very well done. I've investigated a bit, and it seems the sequence mark_pseudo_regno_live (REGNO (reg)); mark_pseudo_regno_live (REGNO (dreg)); mark_pseudo_regn

[Bug middle-end/44554] Stack space after sigsetjmp is reused

2010-09-28 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44554 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure! for powerpc-apple-darwin9 with --enable-checking=release

2010-09-28 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/40457] use stm and ldm to access consecutive memory words

2010-09-29 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40457 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-29 20:06:58 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Wed Sep 29 20:06:55 2010 New Revision: 164732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164732 Log: PR target/40457 * postreload.c (move2add_

[Bug c/45054] [4.6 Regression] struct-by-value-1.c fail.

2010-09-29 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45054 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-29 21:12:52 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Wed Sep 29 21:12:48 2010 New Revision: 164733 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164733 Log: PR c/45054 * reload1.c (replace_pseudos_in

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-02 14:18:07 UTC --- We'll need to find out why stage1 gcc and stage2 gcc produce different output. To do that, the easiest thing to do is to copy object files from stage1 to stage2, rebuild cc1, and then

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-02 16:35:28 UTC --- The files between stage1 and stage2 are supposed to differ. What isn't supposed to differ (after stripping optional debug information) is stage2 and stage3, which are produced by stag

[Bug bootstrap/45801] [4.6 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap comparison failure

2010-10-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-04 22:12:50 UTC --- Thanks for the testcase. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00059.html seems to help with the testcase. Does it also fix bootstrap?

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

2010-10-04 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-04 22:13:12 UTC --- Does http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00059.html fix it?

[Bug rtl-optimization/45966] Incorrect combiner transformation.

2010-10-11 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-11 13:55:03 UTC --- Over here the replacement isn't happening due to costs: Successfully matched this instruction: (set (reg:SI 155) (and:SI (reg:SI 0 r0 [ p ]) (const_int 4095 [0xfff]))) rej

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

2010-10-11 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445 --- Comment #27 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-11 19:39:41 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Oct 11 19:39:37 2010 New Revision: 165329 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165329 Log: PR bootstrap/45445 * ira-lives.c (mark_ps

[Bug rtl-optimization/45966] Incorrect combiner transformation.

2010-10-18 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-19 00:24:39 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Oct 19 00:24:36 2010 New Revision: 165674 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165674 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45966 * combine.c (try

[Bug rtl-optimization/45966] Incorrect combiner transformation.

2010-10-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

2010-10-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-21 23:33:47 UTC --- I'm assuming you run the testcase on Solaris? Can you provide good/bad assembly output?

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

2010-10-22 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

2010-11-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

2010-11-25 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-11-25 16:05:36 UTC --- Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html fixes the problem? For future bug reports, please use gcc -v -save-t

[Bug rtl-optimization/44374] Hoist same instructions in different branches

2010-12-13 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44374 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-12-14 00:23:48 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Dec 14 00:23:40 2010 New Revision: 167779 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167779 Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/44374 Reapply pat

[Bug bootstrap/49160] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

2011-05-25 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-25 16:42:26 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Wed May 25 16:42:23 2011 New Revision: 174216 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174216 Log: PR bootstrap/49160 * libgcc2.h (__powisf2,

[Bug bootstrap/49160] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

2011-05-25 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26 15:12:56 UTC --- Argh, the stupid half-transition again. I grepped only in gcc/config. I seem to fail getting a cross-build to that point, so could you try changing $(gcc_srcdir)/libgcc-std.ver to e

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26 15:33:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > In which file should I do the change(s)? In the one you quoted, libgcc/config/t-slibgcc-darwin. > How could it work if there is no gcc/libgcc-std.ver file

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26 18:25:30 UTC --- Did that work before revision 174284? I'm not sure whether this looks related or not.

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-26 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-26 18:48:13 UTC --- On the one hand there seem to be no changes in libstdc++ since the revision where you had a good bootstrap, but I've looked through the libstdc++ Makefiles and still can't figure out h

[Bug target/49184] r174284 breaks darwin bootstrap

2011-05-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49184 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-27 07:53:53 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri May 27 07:53:51 2011 New Revision: 174321 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174321 Log: PR bootstrap/49173 * config/t-slibgcc-dar

[Bug bootstrap/49173] [4.7 Regression] No rule to make target `../../../../work/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc-std.ver', needed by `libgcc.map'.

2011-05-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49173 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

2011-06-09 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-06-09 13:55:44 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Jun 9 13:55:41 2011 New Revision: 174844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174844 Log: PR target/48673 * config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64

[Bug target/48673] [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts on IA64.

2011-06-09 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/29274] [4.4/4.5 Regression] not using mulsidi3

2011-06-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work|| Resolution||FIXED Known to fail|| --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-06-27 12:53:20 UTC --- Fixed in trunk, wontfix for the old

[Bug tree-optimization/49735] New: mips64-elf libgcc build fails with apparently infinite recursion.

2011-07-13 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735 Summary: mips64-elf libgcc build fails with apparently infinite recursion. Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug rtl-optimization/11320] [3.3 regression] Scheduler bug

2011-07-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11320 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-14 17:06:38 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Jul 14 17:06:33 2011 New Revision: 176280 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176280 Log: PR rtl-optimization/11320 * config/ia64/i

[Bug target/49688] [alpha]: Many execution test failures

2011-07-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-14 20:16:38 UTC --- Are you sure these were configured the same way? One of the output files is using .cfi directives while the other isn't. Could you post a .i file? cleanup-10.c needs headers...

[Bug target/49688] [alpha]: Many execution test failures

2011-07-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-14 20:40:40 UTC --- Well, the new use of .cfi directives probably comes from this bit that was committed in between the two revisions: Index: gcc/config/alpha/elf.h =

[Bug target/49688] [alpha]: Many execution test failures

2011-07-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49688 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-14 21:21:15 UTC --- Just guessing now, but you might also want to try a different version of binutils - maybe there's a problem with .cfi directive handling? Or maybe this has just never been tested wit

[Bug testsuite/49757] FAIL: gcc.target/tic6x/*.c

2011-07-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49757 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-15 12:11:05 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Jul 15 12:11:00 2011 New Revision: 176313 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176313 Log: PR testsuite/49757 * gcc/testsuite/gcc.tar

[Bug rtl-optimization/11320] [3.3 regression] Scheduler bug

2011-07-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11320 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-15 13:20:17 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Jul 15 13:20:10 2011 New Revision: 176315 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176315 Log: Revert 2003-07-10 Eric Botcazou PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/49891] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump_1

2011-07-28 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-28 22:47:26 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Jul 28 22:47:21 2011 New Revision: 176905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176905 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49891 * cfgrtl.c (forc

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

2011-07-29 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/49641] [4.6 Regression] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

2011-08-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-02 13:11:07 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01044.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02174.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

2011-08-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
||2011.08.02 13:11:15 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-02 13:11:15 UTC --- Created attachment

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

2011-08-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

2011-08-02 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-03 00:04:55 UTC --- Created attachment 24898 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24898 Test patch Please try this. If it doesn't work, please attach a preprocessed testcase.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

2011-08-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-05 18:22:39 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Aug 5 18:22:36 2011 New Revision: 177475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177475 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49900 * sched-ebb.c (a

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

2011-08-05 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/77321] [7 Regression] crash in warn_for_memset

2016-08-22 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77321 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt --- Looks OK to commit if you want to. I have no idea what the testcase is supposed to mean or why the C++ frontend makes an identifier node with a NULL type, but I assume there's a good reason.

<    1   2   3   4   5