https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67766, which changed state.
Bug 67766 Summary: [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu: ICE in
simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67891
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67891, which changed state.
Bug 67891 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr43300.c (internal compiler
error) on alpha-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67891
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #36 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 36472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36472&action=edit
backported patch for the 4.9 branch
Chris,
retbnd is of no concern, nothing equivalent existed back then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #37 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Oct 10 12:05:56 2015
New Revision: 228674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reset inlined debug variables at the end of the inlined funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This is fixed in all active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 13 16:34:29 2015
New Revision: 228774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
support BLKmode inputs for store_bit_field
Revision 228586
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine. Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36472|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68083
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This is a latent problem in ifcvt, that pulls the computation involving the
uninitialized k out of the always-false condition. Things go down the hill
when k's default def gets coalesced with b, and rtl op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68083
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
s/ifcvt/ifcombine/ above, sorry
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 36622
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36622&action=edit
Patch I'm testing to fix the problem
This patch stops ifcombine from introducing this kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68083
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Nov 3 00:30:07 2015
New Revision: 229690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR68083] don't introduce undefined behavior in i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68083
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2015-11-04
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 36645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36645&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #56 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Nov 6 10:34:13 2015
New Revision: 229840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] fix copy of PARALLEL entry_parm to CONCAT target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Nov 6 10:34:13 2015
New Revision: 229840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] fix copy of PARALLEL entry_parm to CONCAT target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67753, which changed state.
Bug 67753 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007,
cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
What|Removed
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This is fixed in the trunk. It says:
$ ./xgcc -B./ -Iada/rts/ -c -O1
/l/tmp/build/gcc/trunk/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/test_251265.adb
test_251265.adb:5:12
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
GCC versions from 4.8 on print this error instead:
$ ./xgcc -B./ -Iada/rts/ -c -gnat12
/l/tmp/build/gcc/trunk/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/gcc/buffers.ads
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This problem is fixed in GCC 4.8 and newer. heap_sieve.adb compiles
successfully with the given command line in 4.8, 4.9 and trunk, whereas
proc.adb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52033
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I went back to r219641, just before the problem disappeared again, installed
the r220031 patch to fix the dwarf2out crash, and compilation completed
sucessfully in 36s. Installing the patch for bug 64817
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:23:33 2015
New Revision: 220404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220404&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Avoid allocating memory when trying but failing to simplify XO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:23:47 2015
New Revision: 220405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Simplify XOR of (AND or IOR) of XOR.
for gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:24:00 2015
New Revision: 220406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220406&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix signedness of compares expanding debug exprs.
for gcc/C
gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 34861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34861&action=edit
vta-reset-inlined-vars-at-return-point.patch
Mine. The debug stmts are fine, even their large q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #26 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I had failed to measure peak memory use. It went down from more than 4.8G to
less than 460M (vs 380MB without debug info). Wheee!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case someone gets here digging for more information about the patch above
than what's in comments, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02018.html
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine. Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03302.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Eric, apologies for the slow response, I'm in the middle of an all-week trip
with little Internet access.
I think the best course of action is to adjust gimple_can_coalesce_p so that it
returns false for R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I'm not comfortable with your relaxing the assert in cfgexpand.c:set_rtl. It
means we could have a PARALLEL for a RESULT_DECL *and* other variables, because
of coalescing. Although we can deal with PARAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The reason we don't coalesce on s390 is that there's no PROMOTE_MODE defined
there, so i_1 and j_2 promote to SImode, whereas x_3 and y_4, being function
arguments, promote to DImode as per s390_promote_fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Dec 13 20:37:26 2015
New Revision: 231599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67355] drop dummy zero from reverse VTA ops, fix infinite r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Dec 13 20:43:44 2015
New Revision: 231600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231600&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67355] drop dummy zero from reverse VTA ops, fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine.
H.J., thanks for the reduced testcase. I'm afraid the patch is not right,
though. All the test you removed does is to allow an optimization in the
comparison between two dataflow sets, n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 37284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37284&action=edit
Patch I'm testing to fix the bug
The problem arises because we used to drop overwritten MEMs from loc lists
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:40:12 2016
New Revision: 232217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR69123] make dataflow_set_different details more verbose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Jan 11 10:40:33 2016
New Revision: 232218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR69123] fix handling of MEMs in VTA to avoid dataflow osc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Looking into this...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 37436
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37436&action=edit
Patch I'm testing to fix the bug
Delayed folding may have to instantiate and evaluate template constexpr
func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #31 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jun 9 05:05:12 2015
New Revision: 224261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reset inlined debug variables at the end of the inlined funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #35 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jun 9 05:05:34 2015
New Revision: 224262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224262&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #43 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jul 23 15:34:49 2015
New Revision: 226113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
||2015-07-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
These are fixed in the git branch aoliva/pr64164.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Thanks, H.J., your patch has been integrated into the incremental patch in the
git branch aoliva/pr64164.
||2015-07-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This is fixed with the incremental patch in the git branch aoliva/pr64164.
||2015-07-30
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The problem initially reported in this bug is now fixed in the git branch
aoliva/pr64164
||2015-07-30
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The ICE is fixed with the incremental patch in the git branch aoliva/pr64164.
I had to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #48 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The errors reported in comments 44, 45, 46, and 47 are fixed in the git branch
aoliva/pr64164. I'm giving it all some more testing before posting an updated,
consolidated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case you haven't yet, don't bother. The fix is faulty; at least on ppc64le,
the copying doesn't work because it sets up the pseudo with the address of the
object only after the copying is done. I've go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Ok, it looks like that idea worked, at least on ppc64 and ppc64el; it's
available in the current git branch aoliva/pr64164. Would you please give it a
try on pa when you have a chance? Thanks in advance,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67000
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #50 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67035
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:51:50 2015
New Revision: 226901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 66983, which changed state.
Bug 66983 Summary: [6 Regression] Many testsuite regressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67035
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67034, which changed state.
Bug 67034 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr39928-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 66978, which changed state.
Bug 66978 Summary: [6 Regression] bootstrap failure with
--with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67000, which changed state.
Bug 67000 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in split_complex_args, at function.c:2325
on ppc64le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67000
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67000
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67035, which changed state.
Bug 67035 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54713-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67035
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #52 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Aug 19 17:00:32 2015
New Revision: 227015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] fix regressions reported on m68k and armeb
Def
||2015-08-21
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine. Patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I get exactly the same code with r226900, before the copyrename patch:
cmp r1, #0
rev16ne r0, r0
uxthne r0, r0
.L2:
sxthr0, r0
b foos16
Did you use a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 21 20:03:14 2015
New Revision: 227085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix sched compare regression
for gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #53 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Aug 21 20:03:14 2015
New Revision: 227085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix sched compare regression
for gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
Bug 66978 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Bug 64164 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67000
Bug 67000 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
Bug 66983 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67035
Bug 67035 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67034
Bug 67034 depends on bug 67227, which changed state.
Bug 67227 Summary: [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227
What|Removed |Added
-
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine. The patch in the git branch aoliva/pr64164 fixes this problem (and
revamps the integration between cfgexpand and assign_params). I'll post it
soon.
||2015-09-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Mine. This is fixed in the current aoliva/pr64164 git branch, as part of a
revamp of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Still no luck on a x86_64-linux-gnu build machine, running ../configure
--target=arm-none-eabi --disable-shared --disable-nls --disable-threads
--disable-tls --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++,f
801 - 900 of 1710 matches
Mail list logo
