https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get exactly the same code with r226900, before the copyrename patch:
cmp r1, #0
rev16ne r0, r0
uxthne r0, r0
.L2:
sxth r0, r0
b foos16
Did you use any other configuration flags or compiler options or assembler
version or something to get you the better-optimized code?
