-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r259921 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Jakub, here is the requested output:
bug at 136 aa == -3.36210314311209350626267781732175260e-4932L / 4.0L +
3.64519953188247460252840593361941982e-4951L
bug at 145 aa == -3.362103143112093506262677817321752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85881
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85881
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Guskov ---
Also affected: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-4.c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r255021 triggers an ICE when 510 is compiled for x86_32 on Haswell:
lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_tag_to_tree_code, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Whoops. Sorry, 436 belongs to pr83338, even though its ICE message is the same
as 507`s.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::436 also affected.
during GIMPLE pass: vect
regex.c: In function 'regexec.constprop':
regex.c:5755:1: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_mask_load_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:2349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Guskov ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::447 also affected.
during GIMPLE pass: vect
fe.cc:681:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
0xcb7db1 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool)
/user/aguskov/scratch/agusko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Understood. Going to report back tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Guskov ---
Well, that was faster than I expected.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=20171211/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Guskov ---
The revision was wrong, it`s today`s build.
: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r255510 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr54970.gdb ./pr54970.exe
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c -O0 line 31 a[0] == 4
Option set:
-with-system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Wait, isn`t XPASS an unexpected (i.e. erroneous) pass?
I know that XFAIL = expected fail, so I don`t consider it a fail. But what
about XPASS?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Standard base6 options: -Ofast -funroll-loops
rmal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
C++14 standard (page 1123, see here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4296.pdf#1137)
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
C++14 standard (page 1114, see here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4296.pdf#1128) says
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
C++14 Standard (see here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4296.pdf), section
28.10:
The class template
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
C++14 standard (page 1107, see here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4296.pdf#1121), 28.5.2
[Bitmask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r256888 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257181 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Guskov ---
Just in case that was a question to me, inline-[123].c fails are long gone, and
I don`t see any regex.* fails either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #19 from Andrey Guskov ---
So, with all related makecheck and SPEC fails gone, we can most probably close
this one, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r261748 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr48437.gdb ./pr48437.exe
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr48437.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r261687 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr37726.gdb ./pr37726.exe
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr37726.c -O0 line 11 parm == 5
Option set:
-with-system-zlib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov ---
OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86745
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc started passing after r257479.
Both i386/avx2-vpaddq-3.c and i386/avx2-vpsubq-3.c continue failing.
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257537 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257631 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr49888.gdb ./pr49888.exe
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c -O1 line 18 !c == 1
Option set:
-with-system-zlib
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257631 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr49888.gdb ./pr49888.exe
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c -O1 line 18 !c == 1
Option set:
-with-system-zlib
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257631 triggers this:
spawn gdb -nx -nw -quiet -batch -x pr49888.gdb ./pr49888.exe
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c -O1 line 18 !c == 1
Option set:
-with-system-zlib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84457
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Guskov ---
Whoops. Sorry. Kept getting an HTTP 504 from post_bug.cgi.
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257669 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Guskov ---
Oh wow, that was unexpected!
Will test and report back ASAP.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #23 from Andrey Guskov ---
Tested.
gcc8-pr82004.patch does not work on CPU2017::628.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r257617 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #26 from Andrey Guskov ---
Martin, Jakub, for the Base optset (-Ofast -funroll-loops -march=haswell) there
is no change, 628 keeps failing, but for O2 (-O2 -ffast-math -march=haswell) it
did start passing.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r258476 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../xg++
-B/work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../ /source/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr84828.C
-fno-diagnostics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #32 from Andrey Guskov ---
Created attachment 43761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43761&action=edit
Dump as requested in #c31
Jakub, see the attachment. This is the log of what I get, packed in 7Z.
At a glance,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #33 from Andrey Guskov ---
This is the full execution line I used to produce the log in question, and with
which the test continues failing:
$ gfortran -fdump-tree-all -fdump-rtl-all -m64 -c -o sw_absorption.fppized.o
-march=core-avx
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r258872 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-95.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81624
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I`m seeing a miscompare in 628.pop2_s compiled with the following option set:
-m64 -march=core-avx2 -mfpmath=sse -Ofast -funroll-loops -fconvert=big-endian
-fopenmp
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Approximately a hundred different variables and function calls, the majority of
which are raised to the second or third power, sometimes fourth or fifth. As
628.pop2_s is mostly written in Fortran 90, all of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Okay, finally I`ve got a minimal reproducer.
All this miscompare boils down to the following:
program r628
real(8) :: l = -3
print *, merge("PASSED", "FAILED", 1D-3 .le. 10**l)
end program r628
Normally, 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov ---
This is the actual guilty line:
sw_absorption.F90:chlamnt = 10**(logchl)
It computes 'chlamnt' and then compares it to the list of acceptable values.
When -Ofast is enabled, CPU2017::628 considers 'chla
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Since r251650, the following happens @ CPU2017 502 and 602:
during GIMPLE pass: pre
sel-sched.c: In function 'fill_vec_av_set':
sel-sched.c:3689:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82117
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Weird. I did a Bugzilla search for "r251650", but it told me that nothing was
found.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Since r251606, these three tests began failing in GCC make check, coupled with
the new test added in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82145
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
Option set:
-with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-shared
--enable-host-shared --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=isl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,jit,lto --with-arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov ---
program r187
call s()
call s()
contains
subroutine s()
complex(4), allocatable, save :: a(:, :)
complex(4), pointer, save :: b(:, :)
if (.not. associated(b)) then
allocate(a(2, 2))
allocate(b(2, 2))
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov ---
Yep, 187 seems to be working now.
Not sure about performance, will check this next week when the automatic perf
build arrives.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Since r252896, gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c started failing:
PASS: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c scan-assembler call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82268
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
Option set:
-with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-shared
--enable-host-shared --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=isl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,jit,lto --with-arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Sorry Paul, we happened to be lacking automatic perf runs for 187.
I`ll try running it manually and then report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Guskov ---
Okay, testing complete.
The performance delta is less than 1% (0.96% to be exact), but technically the
new solution is still faster than the one before r252781.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r251333, gcc.dg/lto/chkp-ctor-merge_0.c fails:
during IPA pass: inline
In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r253037 triggered the following fail:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr80732.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
gcc.target/i386/pr80732.c:46:8: warning: 'f2' 'ifunc&#
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r253050 triggered these fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82260-2.c scan-assembler \\mmovl\\t%esi, %ecx
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82260-2.c scan-assembler \\mmovb\\t%dl, %cl
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Guskov ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrey Guskov from comment #5)
> > The revision 245968 breaks compilation of 465.tonto from SPEC2006 with these
> > options:
> >
> > -m32 -Ofast
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41454
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41454&action=edit
JIT make check fails
Revision r248336 made GCC JIT make check start reporti
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Revision r249105 produces several new make check fails:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none line 34 c == &a[0]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Well, it is actually a bisection. Do I need to rule out a GDB problem?
GDB on our testing machine is as follows:
$ gdb -v | grep GDB
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.10.1-31.fc23
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-red
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r252999 triggers this fail:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-11.c scan-assembler-times subq 4
Option set:
-with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82358
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Guskov ---
This is my gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: source/configure -with-syste
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r251220 triggers this fail (or, rather, unexpected pass):
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects execution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82381
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Damn. Sorry for the false alarm.
The correct revision had to be r253275.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov ---
Please update the bug header: s/235275/253275/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82268
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
The command line (broken into several lines for the sake of readability):
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82196-1.c
-B/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82713
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82713
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Option set:
-with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-shared
--enable-host-shared --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=isl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,jit,lto -with-arch=
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r253934 triggers this fail:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c scan-assembler-times
lea.\t\\(%[0-9a-z]+,%[0-9a-z]+,4 3 (found 2
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42500
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42500&action=edit
Fail log
r250721 triggers multipl
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r248035 triggers this unexpected pass:
XPASS: gcc.dg/pr78768.c -Wformat-overflow (test for warnings, line 12)
Tagging as LTO since
: jit
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254140 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-benchmark.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254284 triggers this:
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82002-2a.c:14:1: internal compiler
error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305
0x5b709a _fatal_insn(char const
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254167 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70263-2.c
-B/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/./libmpx/
-B/work/x86_64-pc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82827
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
pr82002-2b is also affected:
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82002-2b.c: In function 'b':
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr82002-2b.c:14:1: error: unrecognizable
insn:
(insn 40 39 41 2 (set (r
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254152 triggers several fails in JIT:
---
PASSED: test-alignment.c.exe iteration 1 of 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
Also affects test-alignment.cc.exe:
NOTE: test-alignment.cc.exe iteration 1 of 5: writing reproducer to
./test-alignment.cc.exe.reproducer.c
PASSED: test-alignment.cc.exe iteration 1 of 5: ve
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r248909 triggers this fail:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
Option set:
-with-system-zlib --with-deman
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r253975 triggers these fails:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/testsuite/g++6/../../xg++
-B/work/gcc
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
r254012 triggers these fails:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82849
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r254452 triggers this:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/xgcc -B/work/gcc/
/source/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/20050826-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82903
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov ---
gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c is also affected:
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c execution,-fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c scan-tree-dump-not dom2 "Invalid sum"
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
