http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-09-30
08:50:14 UTC ---
Are you sure you have applied the right patch? With the patch from comment #7,
the test doesn't fail for me, and moreover there is no assert on line 7077.
I'm attaching the pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-10-05
12:45:21 UTC ---
Any updates on this? The last test still does not fail with the patch from
comment #11. I am about to submit the patch, so are there any new failing
tests or flag combinations?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-10-14
07:56:50 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Oct 14 07:56:47 2010
New Revision: 165454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165454
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45570
* sel-sched-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #21921|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-10-18
10:57:23 UTC ---
Anybody familiar with the expand/tree level can take a look on this? I can
spare some time later this week if folks are busy.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22050|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08
08:11:43 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Nov 8 08:11:38 2010
New Revision: 166429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166429
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
* se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08
17:05:38 UTC ---
Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional
warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have
verified that the test still I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-15
11:10:56 UTC ---
It is no problem to make this function return 0; and explicitly declare its
return type, I just need to check that the test case will still ICE without a
patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-16
14:11:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Nov 16 14:11:39 2010
New Revision: 166798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166798
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46366
* gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-17
16:47:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Comment on attachment 22334 [details]
> testcase failing in r166433
>
> Opened PR46521 and PR46522 for the new two testcases. This one wasn't really
||2010.11.18 08:09:54
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-18
08:09:54 UTC ---
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
||2010.11.24 16:28:39
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-24
16:28:39 UTC ---
Thanks. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-08
13:56:00 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 8 13:55:57 2010
New Revision: 167588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167588
Log:
PR target/43603
* haifa-sched.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-05-25
07:59:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed May 25 07:59:06 2011
New Revision: 174172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174172
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49014
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #24 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-06-17
15:08:55 UTC ---
Thanks for reminder, I've started bootstap and test on ia64 and x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-06-20
11:56:11 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:56:08 2011
New Revision: 175207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175207
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-06-28
12:46:37 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 28 12:46:34 2011
New Revision: 175582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175582
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-07-12
12:12:40 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jul 12 12:12:36 2011
New Revision: 176197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176197
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
301 - 323 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
