http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-08
17:05:38 UTC ---
Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional
warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have
verified that the test still ICEs without the PR45352 patch.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c (revision 166441)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c (working copy)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
picture->f_motion.ref
[0]
[0]
- = forward_reference_frame->base + (offset ? picture->pitches[0] : 0);
+ = (char) (long) (forward_reference_frame->base + (offset ?
picture->pitches[0] : 0));
picture->f_motion.ref[0][1] = (offset);
if (picture->picture_structure)
picture->pitches[0] <<= picture->pitches[1] <<= 1;
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
mpeg2_xvmc_slice
(mpeg2dec_accel_t * accel, picture_t * picture, int code, uint8_t buffer,int
mba_inc)
{
- xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = bitstream_init (picture, buffer);
+ xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = (xine_xvmc_t *) (long) bitstream_init (picture, (void
*) (long) buffer);
slice_xvmc_init (picture, code);
while (1)
{
