[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #32 from Sebastian Huber 2010-09-30 15:36:02 UTC --- Which target milestone do you intend for a fix? It is still present in 4.6.0 20100925.

[Bug c/49119] PowerPC: Wrong code with designated initializers and bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49119 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Huber 2011-05-23 08:00:49 UTC --- Created attachment 24334 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24334 C source code corresponding to the assembler code.

[Bug c/49119] New: PowerPC: Wrong code with designated initializers and bit fields

Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de Target: powerpc-rtems4.11-gcc With GCC 4.6.1 20110513 for PowerPC with -O2 I get this: Disassembly of section .text: : 0: 38 00 00 00 li r0,0 <- T

[Bug target/49641] New: [ARM] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de Target: arm-rtemseabi4.11 Created attachment 24689 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24689 Sample code. The attached source code generates the following assembler code: 0

[Bug target/49641] [ARM] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 Sebastian Huber changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.6 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #37 from Sebastian Huber 2011-08-04 12:30:29 UTC --- Is this problem also related to this bug (GCC 4.6.1 20110627) with comments inside: objdump -d -C /opt/rtems-4.11/lib/gcc/arm-rtems4.11/4.6.1/thumb/vfp/libstdc++.a | grep -A 94 new

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #40 from Sebastian Huber 2011-08-05 06:49:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:33 AM, jiangning.liu at arm dot com [...] > > Is it possible you send me your source code exposing the bug first, so I can > > v

[Bug c++/71957] New: Invalid code generation with function static objects

Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de Target Milestone: --- The following test case produces wrong code with GCC 6. The problem is at least visible on x86, ARM, SPARC and PowerPC. class A { public: A(int); }; template

[Bug tree-optimization/71957] [5/6/7 Regression] Invalid code generation with function static objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71957 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > On a second look the testcase looks invalid as it invokes a virtual function > via C on an object of type C. Why do you think doing this is valid? I try to g

[Bug tree-optimization/71957] [5/6/7 Regression] Invalid code generation with function static objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71957 Sebastian Huber changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2   3