https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Bell ---
As a note, this code doesn't evoke a warning on any other compiler/target that
I tried.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #13 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #12)
> With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
>
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Reiter ---
Thanks for working on this.
I applied the gcc patch and can confirm that the original example no longer
crashes. I found another crasher though and reduced it to:
$ cat test.c
// gcc -O1 -gcodeview -c t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
: In function 'void fun()':
:6:17: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains
'decl with visibility' structure, have 'parm_decl' in start_decl, at
cp/decl.cc:6037
6 | in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Mark, when you get a chance to work on this, if you haven't tried it before,
I'd recommend doing a bootstrap w/ -gcodeview enabled by default to see what
falls out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when generic lambda |ICE with generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Without using a generic lambda (auto), GCC gives this error message:
```
: In function 'void fun()':
:6:17: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const
static member 'fun()a'
6 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101533
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6652764a4558fe9487f17e6c7b18fbc577e8df7
commit r13-9641-ge6652764a4558fe9487f17e6c7b18fbc577e8df7
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101478
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:068aa9a7a9cc163ee5f31bffd746a8cd2ebfef7e
commit r13-9640-g068aa9a7a9cc163ee5f31bffd746a8cd2ebfef7e
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120130
--- Comment #3 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
This slightly modified program:
```
template
class Foo;
template
int g(const Foo&);
template
class Foo {
public:
template
int g(const Foo&) = delete;
friend int g<>(const Foo&);
private:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #6 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> And yet somehow it does. Confirmed.
You forgot to restore the old `CXXFLAGS`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|15.0|16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Bug ID: 120159
Summary: is_layout_compatible_v not exported in std module
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120160
Bug ID: 120160
Summary: Implicitly import std if stadard library header is
included
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #5 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
The input gimple to RTL has the builtin split into two parts: ‘isinfD’ and
‘signbitD’ due to which in the final assembly generated, we have instructions
to check the sign bit of the floating point numb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119864
Alberto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alberto.gcc.bugzilla@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:809c5d7486f91d59e798e0c70ac887f837039ece
commit r15-9635-g809c5d7486f91d59e798e0c70ac887f837039ece
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a1f3615c01cdbf5b2d37448c8bb09a96d5e3330
commit r16-451-g8a1f3615c01cdbf5b2d37448c8bb09a96d5e3330
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e52f71b6dd888f0d5548d9f5bd139601dbafb3be
commit r15-9631-ge52f71b6dd888f0d5548d9f5bd139601dbafb3be
Author: Tomasz KamiÅs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107761
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a33b5db97c4e87bd02f1af1a75b2d84376442fa0
commit r16-442-ga33b5db97c4e87bd02f1af1a75b2d84376442fa0
Author: Luc Grosheintz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And to avoid repeated scanning of DECL_INITIAL when we add more of these
patterns we could record classification of the table in a custom
internal decl attribute we add, __attribute__(("table kind"(int)))
w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61351
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61351&action=edit
gcc16-pr120153.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337d3cdfa8bb8b8404d62ea45690095f9b566cbb
commit r13-9635-g337d3cdfa8bb8b8404d62ea45690095f9b566cbb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0e3078580f4834e4d3d1ba517016a0220b4e3b6
commit r13-9637-gc0e3078580f4834e4d3d1ba517016a0220b4e3b6
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #48 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2d0fb238b1a6eab85924515f0c1ffc2f939e6a7
commit r13-9638-gf2d0fb238b1a6eab85924515f0c1ffc2f939e6a7
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da579a833cf5a5ae463be3f4da70df782612a800
commit r13-9639-gda579a833cf5a5ae463be3f4da70df782612a800
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0e6d797b35ae89044f967160d4abe3868190f0f
commit r15-9636-gd0e6d797b35ae89044f967160d4abe3868190f0f
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41c8e9b61defb6c616bf35ac9693a52f848afca3
commit r16-452-g41c8e9b61defb6c616bf35ac9693a52f848afca3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61356|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #10)
> I thought that switch lowering shouldn't run into empty switches (can't
> recall what made me think that though). I'll look into why that happens.
Well before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
commit r16-454-g0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61357&action=edit
Remove variadic templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #2 from Alberto ---
Thank you very much for the quick fix!
Note to self: there are no is_corresponding_member_v and
is_pointer_interconvertible_with_class_v (those are functions, not traits
structs, and possibly the reason of the ov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
Bug ID: 120163
Summary: Can not import module containig call to pure routine
via abstract interface
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120145
--- Comment #7 from Kirill A. Korinsky ---
For that it worth I had tried to remove 'const' by moving definition into .c
file and use 'extern' in .h.
Crashed the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe10ca6e3cf583640155812b230a0153ce4dc7b7
commit r16-455-gfe10ca6e3cf583640155812b230a0153ce4dc7b7
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
Bug ID: 120164
Summary: GCC fails vectorization when using conditional
__builtin_prefetch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61354|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|Prefetch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Filed the conditional prefetch issue as PR 120164.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250507/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/16.0.0/include/xmmintrin.h:56:3:
missed: statement clobbers memory: __builtin_ia32_prefetch (_10, 0, 3, 0);
/app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c783f31b39a56cbfcc27d84633f9254b5b508d
commit r16-453-ge0c783f31b39a56cbfcc27d84633f9254b5b508d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118446
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
commit r16-454-g0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -w makes the ICE go away ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61360&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61361&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120166
Bug ID: 120166
Summary: [15 Regression] constexpr array with 66 elements
yields "integer initializer is not an integer constant
expression"
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also there are only a few targets which enable fprefetch-loop-arrays by default
so a bug could be around for a few times.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |testsuite
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119753
--- Comment #7 from Bogdan ---
I came back to this and noticed it's still marked as unconfirmed. I could
potentially submit a patch. I am curious whether it's because you are unsure of
the direction you wish to take, in which case I won't need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120160
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #1 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119586
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119589
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da377e7ebf84a05943fb768eaeb7d682dee865fa
commit r16-461-gda377e7ebf84a05943fb768eaeb7d682dee865fa
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119155
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Bug ID: 120168
Summary: [16 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c fails now on
targets which char defaults to unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64* powerpc*
--- Comment #1 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
Bug ID: 120169
Summary: [m68k] internal compiler error: in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.cc:2591 with
LRA enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61365
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61365&action=edit
Preprocessed source for ICE reported in PR-120169
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #13)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #12)
> > With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
Bug ID: 120165
Summary: [m68k] gfortran segfaults when build with LRA enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
The basic principle here was established in C90 DR#047: "there is nothing to
suggest that a not-strictly-conforming array type can magically be transformed
into a strictly conforming pointer parameter via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61363&action=edit
Full build log for gcc native bootstrap on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu with LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61362&action=edit
config.log for gfortran bootstrap on m68k with LRA enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
Rich Newman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, false-positive
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Rich Newman from comment #7)
> Note: clang++ 13.1.0 and 16.0 accept this code, (clang 8.0 does not).
>
> The proof:
> $ /usr/local/llvm-16.0.0/bin/clang++ -c foo.cc
> $ echo $?
> 0
>
> $ /usr/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
hmm:
https://thephd.dev/_vendor/future_cxx/papers/C%20-%20_Any_func.html#design.voidptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
And the related https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n2230.htm .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
commit r16-457-g49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed May 7 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
commit r16-457-g49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed May 7 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 200 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
