https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61357&action=edit
Remove variadic templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #2 from Alberto ---
Thank you very much for the quick fix!
Note to self: there are no is_corresponding_member_v and
is_pointer_interconvertible_with_class_v (those are functions, not traits
structs, and possibly the reason of the ov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
Bug ID: 120163
Summary: Can not import module containig call to pure routine
via abstract interface
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120145
--- Comment #7 from Kirill A. Korinsky ---
For that it worth I had tried to remove 'const' by moving definition into .c
file and use 'extern' in .h.
Crashed the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe10ca6e3cf583640155812b230a0153ce4dc7b7
commit r16-455-gfe10ca6e3cf583640155812b230a0153ce4dc7b7
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
Bug ID: 120164
Summary: GCC fails vectorization when using conditional
__builtin_prefetch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61354|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|Prefetch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Filed the conditional prefetch issue as PR 120164.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250507/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/16.0.0/include/xmmintrin.h:56:3:
missed: statement clobbers memory: __builtin_ia32_prefetch (_10, 0, 3, 0);
/app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c783f31b39a56cbfcc27d84633f9254b5b508d
commit r16-453-ge0c783f31b39a56cbfcc27d84633f9254b5b508d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118446
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
commit r16-454-g0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -w makes the ICE go away ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61360&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61361&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120166
Bug ID: 120166
Summary: [15 Regression] constexpr array with 66 elements
yields "integer initializer is not an integer constant
expression"
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also there are only a few targets which enable fprefetch-loop-arrays by default
so a bug could be around for a few times.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |testsuite
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119753
--- Comment #7 from Bogdan ---
I came back to this and noticed it's still marked as unconfirmed. I could
potentially submit a patch. I am curious whether it's because you are unsure of
the direction you wish to take, in which case I won't need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120160
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #1 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119586
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119589
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da377e7ebf84a05943fb768eaeb7d682dee865fa
commit r16-461-gda377e7ebf84a05943fb768eaeb7d682dee865fa
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119155
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
commit r16-462-g9e85d056cd15befffb39d2f84902d21eda4d98eb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Bug ID: 120168
Summary: [16 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c fails now on
targets which char defaults to unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64* powerpc*
--- Comment #1 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
Bug ID: 120169
Summary: [m68k] internal compiler error: in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.cc:2591 with
LRA enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61365
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61365&action=edit
Preprocessed source for ICE reported in PR-120169
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #13)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #12)
> > With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
Bug ID: 120165
Summary: [m68k] gfortran segfaults when build with LRA enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
The basic principle here was established in C90 DR#047: "there is nothing to
suggest that a not-strictly-conforming array type can magically be transformed
into a strictly conforming pointer parameter via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61363&action=edit
Full build log for gcc native bootstrap on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu with LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61362&action=edit
config.log for gfortran bootstrap on m68k with LRA enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
Rich Newman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, false-positive
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Rich Newman from comment #7)
> Note: clang++ 13.1.0 and 16.0 accept this code, (clang 8.0 does not).
>
> The proof:
> $ /usr/local/llvm-16.0.0/bin/clang++ -c foo.cc
> $ echo $?
> 0
>
> $ /usr/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
hmm:
https://thephd.dev/_vendor/future_cxx/papers/C%20-%20_Any_func.html#design.voidptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
And the related https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n2230.htm .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109214
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
commit r16-457-g49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed May 7 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
commit r16-457-g49c44911df72f55e2004ffa9f5eb362de29ca188
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed May 7 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm the change fixed the build for my environment as well. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
Iouri Kharon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61313|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that in vect_analyze_early_break_dependences we do
stmt_vec_info stmt_vinfo
= vect_stmt_to_vectorize (loop_vinfo->lookup_stmt (stmt));
and look at virtual operands of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
--- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead ---
FWIW I have a WIP patch that fixes the ICE (also for the original testcase):
diff --git a/gcc/cp/optimize.cc b/gcc/cp/optimize.cc
index 6f9a77f407a..fc4d6c2e351 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/optimize.cc
+++ b/gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119956
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
This might be kind of easy to improve upon by extending lib/lto.exp's torture
variants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119956
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
We've been moving it there for years downstream and had no problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120145
--- Comment #6 from Kirill A. Korinsky ---
I have backported both patch to used 8.4.0 as bootstrap compiler and 11.2.0 as
target.
It crashed the same way:
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from /us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb
commit r16-434-g625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Wed M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
--- Comment #13 from Robin Dapp ---
Going to push this to the 14 branch later today if the x86 testsuite shows no
regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae987baeb5fb70877fd007db80b77e374f676c76
commit r16-435-gae987baeb5fb70877fd007db80b77e374f676c76
Author: hongtao.liu
Date: Tue Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
Bug ID: 120148
Summary: -fno-builtin suppresses -Wformat warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: dri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
--- Comment #1 from Florian Krohm ---
Created attachment 61349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61349&action=edit
gcc -v output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8c4b6aa8e0521770c6f9fd48dd13dd85e3a2fc9
commit r16-436-gb8c4b6aa8e0521770c6f9fd48dd13dd85e3a2fc9
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu May 1 06:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Plea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
Bug ID: 120149
Summary: ICE in GCC when deducing return type with nested
lambdas using accumulate with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120150
Bug ID: 120150
Summary: ICE in GCC when deducing return type with nested
lambdas using accumulate with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see how that commit can cause this.
The native_handle_type is determined by:
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_STDIO_PURE
using native_handle_type = __c_file*; // FILE*
#elif _GLIBCXX_USE__GET_OSFHANDLE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
XU Kailiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xu2k3l4 at outlook dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[13/14/15/16 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120138
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Summary|(14/15/16)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 118964, which changed state.
Bug 118964 Summary: include in the module causes a
compilation error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #1 from MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR ---
*** Bug 120150 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120150
MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Bug ID: 120151
Summary: ICE in GCC when compiling a templated decltype with
incomplete lambda body with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 200 of 204 matches
Mail list logo