[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- -Warray-bounds has been included in -Wall since before GCC 4.8.0 which is 12 years ago I think it might be too late to reconsider this. Plus -Warray-bounds false positives are not as well spread as yo

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #14 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- >to do this for entry_size < G.pagesize * GGC_QUIRE_SIZE, this should >avoid fragmenting the virtual address space. Possibly do this only >for USING_MADVISE, not sure. Okay let me test that.

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- What about removing -Wuninitialized too since that has just as many false positives and has been included in -Wall even longer, at least 25 years now.

[Bug c++/119383] [14/15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib test failures after commit r15-8011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|14.3 Summary|[15 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/119559] [15 regression] GOMP: ICE in modify_call_for_omp_dispatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/119569] FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in modify_call_for_omp_dispatch, at gimplify.cc:3957)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/118391] ICE: in add_extra_args, at cp/pt.cc:13737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118391 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/119574] [15 regression] ICE on lambda in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-01 Keywords|

[Bug c++/119574] [15 regression] ICE on lambda in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/119383] [15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib test failures after commit r15-8011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a4f863956c0bf18b97738da475bdb9c14504b2 commit r14-11498-g42a4f863956c0bf18b97738da475bdb9c14504b2 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug tree-optimization/119491] missed tail call due to exceptions which is empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119491 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 60952 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60952&action=edit gcc15-pr119491.patch Ok, in that case the following patch attempts to handle it (for musttail only) in the tai

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #8 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- The workload does a lot of bitmap manipulations: # 5.62% cc1plus cc1plus [.] bitmap_and_into(bitmap_head*, bitmap_head const*) 5.30% cc1plus cc1plus [.] bitm

[Bug c++/119578] New: internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Bug ID: 119578 Summary: internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 119551, which changed state. Bug 119551 Summary: [modules] ICE when reading inline var referencing TU-local entity https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/119551] [modules] ICE when reading inline var referencing TU-local entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 --- Comment #3 from pavol at rusnak dot io --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/. We need preprocessed sources for > Activation.cpp. attached > (I think we also have a dupe of this, but I don't know

[Bug c/117689] enum with underying type "extension" to GNU 17 is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, the code in finish_decl() in c-decl.cc seems to be deliberately deferring the error diagnostic for an incomplete types on certain static decls. From a user's perspective, I think it's bette

<    1   2   3