https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119570
Bug ID: 119570
Summary: FAIL:
libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/metadirective-4.c
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More specifically, gcc accepts
enum e;
static enum e thing;
enum e { e1, e2, e3};
but rejects
enum e;
int foo (void)
{
static enum e thing;
return -1;
}
enum e { e1, e2, e3};
and also reje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119427
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19ba913517b5e2a001fa9c0f060a1ac74430c027
commit r15-9131-g19ba913517b5e2a001fa9c0f060a1ac74430c027
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
pixman is another victim.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119447
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
That approach seems reasonable to me FWIW. Alternatively maybe we could fall
back to using the dependent DECL_CONTEXT (gen_tmpl) as 'ctx' if
tsubst_entering_scope fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119493
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01acd453d89ff5e414fade2dfeeae1f652143376
commit r15-9132-g01acd453d89ff5e414fade2dfeeae1f652143376
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
also seen with arm64 -> alpha and s390x -> ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14 regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #5 from Cameron Angus ---
Created attachment 60948
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60948&action=edit
Preprocessed source for module interface
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #2 from Cameron Angus ---
Yeah I realized afterwards there was a limit so I guess that is why.
Unfortunately even compressed it's a little over 1MB. Can I link to external
hosting?
I'll try to repro on a more recent snapshot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> The following repro
Looks like it was not attached? Maybe you need to compress it.
Also 20250223 is at least one month out of date, you can test the latest?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you add -save-temps and provide the generated .ii file?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30d7bca6c2a3d70ecafdc4b2cf807944c736214c
commit r14-11496-g30d7bca6c2a3d70ecafdc4b2cf807944c736214c
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119569
Bug ID: 119569
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal
compiler error: in modify_call_for_omp_dispatch, at
gimplify.cc:3957)
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
...and that one consists of the first and second patch in the series at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/cover.1743458148.git.jamb...@gcc.gnu.org/T/#t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> Maybe add the PR119530 testcase as well? It is structurally similar, but it
> lacks vectors so may be more useful food for the fuzzers.
I have that on my TODO list,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9803f10c9f376f6d091e7ef3ad6e1c92e7c8e8c
commit r15-9128-ge9803f10c9f376f6d091e7ef3ad6e1c92e7c8e8c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119565
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only change I could see that might have any effect on that code is
r15-9047-g9c5505a35d9d71 which most likely means this is a code layout changes
due to other optimizations happening in the non-hot path.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
Bug ID: 119566
Summary: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25410
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #7 from Cameron Angus ---
Separating the attachments got me just under the limit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #6 from Cameron Angus ---
Created attachment 60949
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60949&action=edit
Preprocessed source for consuming TU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119537
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6c2248cfd4bc922378f554578ee44e6b4690f5d
commit r15-9124-ga6c2248cfd4bc922378f554578ee44e6b4690f5d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119535
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8de7704428dfe008d195d8da95d6772153b0cc7
commit r15-9126-gb8de7704428dfe008d195d8da95d6772153b0cc7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119493
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02409a145946ca0d4f502f43fc3cc20de8b3dea1
commit r15-9125-g02409a145946ca0d4f502f43fc3cc20de8b3dea1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101587
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #9)
> Still need casting the return difference type from __mindist, I think?
Ah yes, we need to cast it back to the type of the first argument.
So maybe __mindist isn't act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119568
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
So the ICE occurs with checking enabled, and otherwise it goes into hog mode:
gcc_checking_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (from_mode) == GET_MODE_CLASS (to_mode)
&& from_mode < to_mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101587
--- Comment #11 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #9)
> > Still need casting the return difference type from __mindist, I think?
>
> Ah yes, we need to cast it back to the type of the fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp ---
Do you happen to have an excution test ready so I can have a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
920 sub = subsubconvs[i];
921 if (sub->rank > t->rank)
(gdb) p sub
$1 = (conversion *) 0x0
(gdb) p j
$1 = 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119369
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:816335960d020eac92d49bc9cd13729afd313da7
commit r15-9122-g816335960d020eac92d49bc9cd13729afd313da7
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119369
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f58d8ac03911063d6a8887a2bee7b4e25ac1871
commit r15-9123-g2f58d8ac03911063d6a8887a2bee7b4e25ac1871
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958
Milian Wolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at milianw dot de
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
--- Comment #2 from Chameleon ---
Created attachment 60951
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60951&action=edit
file.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119173
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:182d891e13c78187f5e4f76512e03297fea0e56a
commit r15-9127-g182d891e13c78187f5e4f76512e03297fea0e56a
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119173
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114723
Bug 114723 depends on bug 113688, which changed state.
Bug 113688 Summary: verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23,
builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c and gnu23-tag-1.c with -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to andi from comment #8)
> > > Needs a workload where it matters
> >
> > PR119387 had
> >
> > 85.81% 1500713 cc1plus cc1plus [.]
> > ggc_internal_alloc(un
> >
> > for m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[12/13/14/15 r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0cc14c62ad7403afcab3c2e38851d3ab179352f
commit r15-9129-gd0cc14c62ad7403afcab3c2e38851d3ab179352f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #6 from 曾治金 ---
This issue report in https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26936, and I
extract it into my test case. I just check the assemble code and don't run the
test case.
But if you need to run the opencv application to fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-15-cross/5ubuntu1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-15-cross-ports/6ubuntu1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Version|14.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
Victor Do Nascimento changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 106185, which changed state.
Bug 106185 Summary: Spurious Wstringop-overflow in std::vector::resize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106185
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106185
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572
Bug ID: 119572
Summary: [15 Regression] Recent change triggers regression on
RISC-V vector test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Bug ID: 119563
Summary: internal compiler error on vector initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #3 from 曾治金 ---
Hi, it will reproduce by gcc 14.2. And in gcc upstream code, you need to add
`--param logical-op-non-short-circuit=0` flag to reproduce. This is because the
default value of LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT of risc-v is c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119436
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |simartin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #7 from 曾治金 ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #2)
> Any information about gcc version? Seems asm layout is different from
> today's upstream. CC RISC-V relatives.
>
> 123 │ .L41:
> 124 │ addiw t2,t2,1
> 125 │ v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
Bug ID: 119564
Summary: ICE using module including boost headers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavol at rusnak dot io
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578
--- Comment #2 from pavol at rusnak dot io ---
Created attachment 60954
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60954&action=edit
preprocessed input (zipped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42b2fc3fc9c06c174ec4d2c0566f54b624bc70b5
commit r15-9137-g42b2fc3fc9c06c174ec4d2c0566f54b624bc70b5
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||c++-lambda
--- Comment #4 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #54 from Alexander Monakov ---
I think the x86_64 behavior is simply copied as-is from i386.
On i386, there was a time when Glibc wouldn't preserve eax+ecx+edx in the PLT
trampoline, but preserving those became necessary when GCC ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113239
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0, 14.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0210bedf481a9fd248ce29650b824bcd84c3723c
commit r15-9136-g0210bedf481a9fd248ce29650b824bcd84c3723c
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119579
Bug ID: 119579
Summary: Derived type not initialized correctly with array
sections
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119579
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119478
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117063
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119577
Bug ID: 119577
Summary: RISC-V: Redundant vector IV roundtrip.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> The Linux kernel is some what a special case and somewhat should be using
> `--param min-pagesize=0` to avoid the warnings about low fixed addresses.
That is f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
--- Comment #8 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
The Linux kernel disables -Warray-bounds in GCC 9 and later (and
-Wstringop-overflow unconditionally).
https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/blame/5be5ecdaf1e7fb1a04e6122771b432851cd2393d/init/Kconfig#L905-L92
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #53 from Ard Biesheuvel ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #51)
> Michael, can you give your ack/nack for Ard's proposal in comment #24 (the
> second variant, I guess keying off -m[no-]direct-extern-access doesn't make
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60936|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.5.0, 15.0
Summary|False
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 regression] New |[12/13/14 regression] New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
--- Comment #6 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
Will Wray points out that GCC's own codebase disables `-Warray-bounds` in
several places, including at least these places in current master:
gcc/cp/module.cc:#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes it was fixed by Honza's r15-5361-gaac5c57ee16723
Add __builtion_unreachable to vector::size(), vector::capacity()
This patch makes it clear that vector sizes and capacities are not
negat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:844eed3364309bd20cbb7d6793a16b7c6b889ba4
commit r15-9134-g844eed3364309bd20cbb7d6793a16b7c6b889ba4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #6)
> Will Wray points out that GCC's own codebase disables `-Warray-bounds` in
> several places, including at least these places in current master:
>
> gcc/cp/modul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo