https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318

--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> Maybe add the PR119530 testcase as well? It is structurally similar, but it
> lacks vectors so may be more useful food for the fuzzers.

I have that on my TODO list, but I was already testing the patches when I
confirmed it was a duplicate.

Reply via email to