https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119318
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > Maybe add the PR119530 testcase as well? It is structurally similar, but it > lacks vectors so may be more useful food for the fuzzers. I have that on my TODO list, but I was already testing the patches when I confirmed it was a duplicate.