https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118756
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #6)
> The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d05b64bdd048ffb7f72d97553888934a9bcd13fa
>
> commit r15-7792-gd05b64bdd048ffb7f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119096
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10e4107dfcf9fe324d0902f16411a75c596dab91
commit r15-7802-g10e4107dfcf9fe324d0902f16411a75c596dab91
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 regression] Loop |[14 regression] Loop with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bd664838398980f1c8af60a946947ff83744fcc
commit r15-7804-g5bd664838398980f1c8af60a946947ff83744fcc
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef605e106c6075bfe2a5625add7185a9a3f722b1
commit r15-7803-gef605e106c6075bfe2a5625add7185a9a3f722b1
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-3-4
Build|gcc versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119106
--- Comment #1 from federico ---
The `-fdump-tree-original` seems to highlight that:
The `save`d variable data is accessed with unrolled indices
[...] = n[(integer(kind=8)) i[0] + -1][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
The `parameter` variable data is access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119105
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119107
Bug ID: 119107
Summary: inconsistent elimination of redundant *_extend
operations
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119106
Bug ID: 119106
Summary: Crash with character array constructor + implicit loop
+ data from `parameter` variable
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119105
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to programmingkidx from comment #0)
> Using g++ 14.2.0 I see these results:
> Number of failures: 201
> Number of successes: 2
>
> Using clang++ 13 and 19 I see these results:
> Number of failur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119105
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. your macports build of GCC is configured with:
--with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/opt/local/libexec/gcc14/libc++/include/c++/v1
So you should be able to use g++ -stdlib=libc++ to use libc++ as the C++
st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||programmingkidx at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119108
Bug ID: 119108
Summary: [15 Regression] AArch64 Commit 'vect: Force alignment
peeling ...'
(https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=68326d5
d1a593d) causes r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118874
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60651&action=edit
gcc15-pr118874.patch
This seems to work for me for both PRs. Untested otherwise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119108
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119106
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-04
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:455ea90d6e5ed2938fb7cc7008bf738dcbbc72d4
commit r14-11375-g455ea90d6e5ed2938fb7cc7008bf738dcbbc72d4
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119071
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e79fc5a7bc9958c95fd09928188f5aa6c051d4c1
commit r14-11377-ge79fc5a7bc9958c95fd09928188f5aa6c051d4c1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7b8307893ef0b6a2a0565d75af831cca4c9511a
commit r14-11376-gb7b8307893ef0b6a2a0565d75af831cca4c9511a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119111
Bug ID: 119111
Summary: [[deprecated]] attribute NOT work IF be placed
between () and {}
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119110
Bug ID: 119110
Summary: [15 regression] 25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc etc.
FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119110
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97165
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Assignee|rth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04909c7ecc023874c3444b85f88c60b7b7cc7778
commit r15-7812-g04909c7ecc023874c3444b85f88c60b7b7cc7778
Author: Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119109
Bug ID: 119109
Summary: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nsdmi5.C FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #13)
> Debian doesn't ship fixed pthread.h but they are in my personal
> builds. I will probably remove fixed pthread.h from my personal
> builds.
Or use --disable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119109
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vehre at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119038
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ed37595a3c5cf246e8eeea337cf3071c4bb3a59
commit r14-11382-g2ed37595a3c5cf246e8eeea337cf3071c4bb3a59
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119038
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118318
--- Comment #20 from Sam James ---
Full FF build also works fine. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115580
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119061
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I'm not sure we bother with it for new features (as opposed to reporting a bug
or regression). We set target milestone when things are fixed, usually.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119061
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ville.voutilainen at
gmail d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119061
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118874
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> But guess check_return_expr isn't expecting first argument like TARGET_EXPR,
> normal
> user code would return some VAR_DECL, not a TARGET_EXPR.
In
struct A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119060
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118874
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Created attachment 60651 [details]
> gcc15-pr118874.patch
>
> This seems to work for me for both PRs. Untested otherwise.
thanks Jakub ... if you give me a co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109431
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:173cf7c9b8c0d61bb2cb0bd3a9e3150b393ab59a
commit r15-7810-g173cf7c9b8c0d61bb2cb0bd3a9e3150b393ab59a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85408
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 89116 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90040
Bug 90040 depends on bug 89116, which changed state.
Bug 89116 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in
cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin ---
Debian doesn't ship fixed pthread.h but they are in my personal
builds. I will probably remove fixed pthread.h from my personal
builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109431
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89499
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
I think that can_inline_edge should check for compatible oacc_get_fn_attrib
and the always-inline case is then simply invalid and should be (will be)
diagnosed by the always-inline diagnostic not being able
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2025-01-29 00:00:00 |2025-3-4
--- Comment #14 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #16 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119113
Bug ID: 119113
Summary: missed optimization with `pointer to member function`
with non-direct usage
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119105
--- Comment #5 from Programmingkid ---
Thank you Jonathan for responding. When you do test your patch could you run my
program and let us all know the results at the end (how many failures and
successes)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at rivosinc dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118531
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df9c10d18b5b1323efb5f7823c31a259859d87a4
commit r14-11381-gdf9c10d18b5b1323efb5f7823c31a259859d87a4
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118976
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa8793daa4ec110ae1e8fa240614651711b93fe4
commit r14-11380-gaa8793daa4ec110ae1e8fa240614651711b93fe4
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119114
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113349
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Better test:
```
// PR c++/113349
template void foo() { }
template using tuple_element_t = _Tp;
template struct types;
template struct types {
template using el = tuple_element_t;
};
void
g ()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119112
Bug ID: 119112
Summary: dub OOMs with restrictive ulimit in Docker
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111750
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Brian Bi from comment #2)
> > I believe I'm seeing the same bug on GCC trunk on Godbolt. Here's a
> > minimized version of the code I'm working with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111750
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Brian Bi from comment #2)
> > > I believe I'm seeing the same bug on GCC trunk on Godbolt. Here's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111750
Brian Bi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bbi5291 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111750
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.5.0
Summary|Spurious -Warray-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119119
Bug ID: 119119
Summary: ICE in create_tmp_var
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119120
Bug ID: 119120
Summary: Unnecessary fld when assigning real or imaginary part
of a complex variable
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119119
--- Comment #1 from John Eivind Helset ---
Created attachment 60655
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60655&action=edit
Preprocessed source
File was too big so had to compress. Decompress with `tar -xf source.tar.gz`,
compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119111
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119118
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119116
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There is no constructor for std::bad_cast that takes a custom string.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
--- Comment #21 from Eli Schwartz ---
I think that it makes sense to install this, for the same reason that one would
wish to install the "gcc" symlink. If the user only has a single supported GCC
version, this is a benefit. If the user has multi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119119
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
t.cc: In constructor ‘exec::__ignore_all_values::__operation<_Sender,
_ReceiverId>::__t::__t(_Sender&&,
exec::__ignore_all_values::__operation<_Sender, _ReceiverId>::_Receiver) [with
_Sender = exec::__seqexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119073
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2a7f845698bfb7aaded9ffacd7046ae25a8b1fc
commit r15-7819-gf2a7f845698bfb7aaded9ffacd7046ae25a8b1fc
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119073
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119110
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
--- Comment #20 from Sam James ---
*** Bug 70345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118787
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1853b02d8c127740055242123db2d32cf9476ea9
commit r15-7822-g1853b02d8c127740055242123db2d32cf9476ea9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 119102, which changed state.
Bug 119102 Summary: GCC 15.0 'import std;' fails with Ofast (not with O3) due
to some openmp internal error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119102
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119102
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddeb70548c81f5dba91f281290584698897151d8
commit r15-7824-gddeb70548c81f5dba91f281290584698897151d8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119119
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
At first I thought it was related to r15-3544-g2067df800df930 but it was
mentioned that it happens on GCC 14.2.1 also and that was not backported and
fab is way after einline and should not have an effect on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118976
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78380fd7f743e23dfdf013d68a2f0347e1511550
commit r15-7807-g78380fd7f743e23dfdf013d68a2f0347e1511550
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119002
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ff01a88c484775fe8b5f1ca46fa24dfe0b14f3d
commit r15-7806-g1ff01a88c484775fe8b5f1ca46fa24dfe0b14f3d
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118976
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119002
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119105
Bug ID: 119105
Summary: std::locale only working with C and POSIX
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Shouldn't we optimize this in match.pd when global range says it is ok or
> during vrp/evrp using local ranges? I mean turn the int shift into
> {,un}signed {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 60648
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60648&action=edit
patch
I'm testing this for GCC 16.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
