https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118856
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118835
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac9806dae30d07ab082ac341fe5646987753adcb
commit r15-7499-gac9806dae30d07ab082ac341fe5646987753adcb
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118791
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118248
--- Comment #25 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #23)
> (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #22)
> > pthis.msgBuf = buf;
> In D, this is an array copy assignment.
>
> I've tried lowering this to `foreach (i; 0 ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107741
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12feb78be517472ca941953dce47d6e78e5a17f8
commit r15-7518-g12feb78be517472ca941953dce47d6e78e5a17f8
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60493|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7)
> > > Would be useful to have a bisect on where the original testcase in comment
> > > #0 started to warn.
> > GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Wait:
> if (&listJets.D.32199._M_impl._M_node.D.14392 == _30)
>
>
> This is not the canonical order. The constant should be last ...
Oh but it is NOT a con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Summary|[15 regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
Bug ID: 118868
Summary: internal compiler error: 'verify_gimple' failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118869
Bug ID: 118869
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal
terminated program cc1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Ah, it's kind of a "regression", and kind of not, as the builtin was only added
in r12-5368-gefb7c51024ccad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118869
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||TREE
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118870
Bug ID: 118870
Summary: internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at
gimplify.cc:802
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118375
Peter Damianov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27653070db35216d5115cc25672fcc6a51203d26
commit r15-7520-g27653070db35216d5115cc25672fcc6a51203d26
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118873
Bug ID: 118873
Summary: -favoid-store-forwarding makes a mess out of a STLF
fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-14
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] Huge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118871
Bug ID: 118871
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117047
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
> but what would be really helpful is an option to call
> gcc_jit_context_set_bool_option (ctxt, GCC_JIT_BOOL_OPTION_SELFCHECK_GC);
> on the underlying gcc_jit_context (or I suppose you could hack up your emac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118872
Bug ID: 118872
Summary: RISCV: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at
expr.cc:4636 for rvv
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110800
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118832
--- Comment #9 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #8)
> I think for vec_duplicate the idea is the same as for all the other splits -
> keep it in simple shape so we can combine/fwprop etc. It also helps
> converting e.g.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118858
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
The reason why I only added cold was not a question of streaming (I don't think
we avoid any this way) but rather me being lazy, in the sense that I really
wanted the cold attribute to go in reasonably quick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118849
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fa962a5db797665972aaa65426b881754782cfb
commit r14-11305-g9fa962a5db797665972aaa65426b881754782cfb
Author: Nathaniel Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118849
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:926c989131e914e69cd73529d183ebd9d637798a
commit r15-7505-g926c989131e914e69cd73529d183ebd9d637798a
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118822
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26baa2c09b39abf037afad349a318dc5734eae25
commit r15-7502-g26baa2c09b39abf037afad349a318dc5734eae25
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118833
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26baa2c09b39abf037afad349a318dc5734eae25
commit r15-7502-g26baa2c09b39abf037afad349a318dc5734eae25
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118858
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118832
--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp ---
I think for vec_duplicate the idea is the same as for all the other splits -
keep it in simple shape so we can combine/fwprop etc. It also helps converting
e.g.
vmv.v.x v3,a3 vadd.vv v1, v2, v3
into
vad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118682
Bug 118682 depends on bug 118638, which changed state.
Bug 118638 Summary: [14 Regression] Miscompile with -Os and -O0/1/2/3 since
r14-4810
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|[12/13/14 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] IPA |[12/13 Regression] IPA ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 regression]
|I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118776
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] ICE |[12/13 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118857
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118857
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118805
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Alexandr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118849
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e485b8c85c31856b9f7c91015ac94874b100bd4
commit r15-7504-g0e485b8c85c31856b9f7c91015ac94874b100bd4
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118790
--- Comment #35 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7738c6286fba7ec2112823f53cc2cefac2c8d007
commit r15-7506-g7738c6286fba7ec2112823f53cc2cefac2c8d007
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 60487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60487&action=edit
preprocessed, unincluded source
Needs -std=c99 -fgnu89-inline -fpermissive in addition to -Ofast
-march=x86-6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113800
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 113800, which changed state.
Bug 113800 Summary: [C++26] P2308R1 - Template parameter initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113800
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and -O3 instead of -Ofast also makes it work. (semantic-interposition?)
There's only a single loop vectorized in fold-const.c,
which is in native_interpret_int:
fold-const.c:8109:23: optimized: loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113800
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84f19ecb01958fa791b9213dbd80331474fca9f0
commit r15-7507-g84f19ecb01958fa791b9213dbd80331474fca9f0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118859
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Tobias B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
A testcase would be the following - we don't perform loop-header copying
for an isolated testcase, thus manually here.
void *
foo (void **p, void **limit)
{
if (++p < limit)
do
{
void *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118859
Bug ID: 118859
Summary: [C++] dispatch accepts non-pointer template argument
with adjust_args
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #12)
> > (We should also probably have a self-test that all attributes used by
> > built-in functions are known to LTO.)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118858
Bug ID: 118858
Summary: Missing builtin attributes handling for DEF_ATTR_IDENT
with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-impro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85b0a6e853aeda30acc1990c8bf13951c7e4da7d
commit r15-7500-g85b0a6e853aeda30acc1990c8bf13951c7e4da7d
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118763
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 regression] memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 regression] Reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115586
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> FWIW I see this also on aarch64
I filed the AArch64 bug weeks ago
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118691, there we don't need
-fprofile-generate to tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118574
--- Comment #28 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1855a3e0bcf0f94bc9fa421ccc9ebd0565c62cd
commit r15-7503-ga1855a3e0bcf0f94bc9fa421ccc9ebd0565c62cd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > FWIW I see this also on aarch64
>
> I filed the AArch64 bug weeks ago
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118559
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118852
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The actual error is
./cpugcc_r_peak.gcc7-m64 200.c -O3 -finline-limit=5 -o
200.opts-O3_-finline-limit_5.s
200.c: In function 'subre_':
200.c:45552:7: benchmark internal error: in ?, at tree-ssa-pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118858
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
IMO we should work towards sharing more core code across frontends for this
kind of stuff.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118863
Bug ID: 118863
Summary: Cannot #include in global module fragment
with -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 60488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60488&action=edit
Patch solving the PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109180
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70536
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53e1686e6e0c3e809384e6fcf5eed46f37bc296b
commit r15-7512-g53e1686e6e0c3e809384e6fcf5eed46f37bc296b
Author: Ed Catmur
Date: Sat Feb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70536
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I worked on this issue this week. I tried several approaches. I added the best
patch as an attachment. The patch changes an order of coloring allocnos in one
thread.
Unfortunately, although the patch s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862
Bug ID: 118862
Summary: UBSAN: shift exponent too large since
r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118865
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118861
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-13
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118860
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|ICE Segfault wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #38 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ac313525a1faecb9f39a0ba3240f7a9ead91dcc
commit r15-7515-g6ac313525a1faecb9f39a0ba3240f7a9ead91dcc
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109180
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if this is due to targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117293
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88ca0670c79f123cc84928f78cd3d5eb46b91338
commit r14-11307-g88ca0670c79f123cc84928f78cd3d5eb46b91338
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117992
Bug 117992 depends on bug 117739, which changed state.
Bug 117739 Summary: `-fhardened -Wl,-z,lazy` still passes `-z now` to the
linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo