https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
is that powerpc64le or powerpc{,64} big endian? (or both)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118533
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118504
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-non-eabi|arm-non-eabi,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117798
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
F2023 states
The following Fortran 2018 features might have a different interpretation
under this document.
After an allocatable deferred length character variable is assigned a
value by an IOMSG= or ERRMS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> So, we have:
>
> Trying 15 -> 16:
>15: flags:CCNO=cmp(r115:SI,0)
> REG_DEAD r115:SI
>16: r106:QI=flags:CCNO>0
> Successfully matched this instructio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60374|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118752
Bug ID: 118752
Summary: clang::no_sanitize scopped attribute should be an
alias to gnu::no_sanitize
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85563
Paul Eggert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the shrink wrapping issue with the abort was fixed with GCC 11.
But we still get:
```
ucomisd %xmm1, %xmm0
jp .L3
setnp %al
movl$0, %edx
movzbl %al,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> It isn't a dup of PR 117081 since it is a different failure.
But it's caused by the same commit and the same rootcause?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e41a5a2a0832509fa1c0b7cab0c8001fadbd23d4
commit r15-7365-ge41a5a2a0832509fa1c0b7cab0c8001fadbd23d4
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Summary|[12/13/14/15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|deferred|
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 85563, which changed state.
Bug 85563 Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm
regression with __builtin_unreachable and GCC 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85563
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > Hongtao - do we care about -miamcu? Should we eventually deprecat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> Created attachment 60350 [details]
> ira: Don't increase callee-saved register cost by 1000x
NOTE, r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593 improved 500.perlbench_r on many different
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117082
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > It isn't a dup of PR 117081 since it is a different failure.
>
> But it's caused by the same commit and the same rootcause?
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118734
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60376|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118731
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE with iterator in|assertion failure with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118731
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Maybe there are multiple issues here conspiring.
Without elemental procedure, without array constructor:
program p
implicit none
type string_t
! character(len=:), allocatable :: string_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115568
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've reproduced the bug and started to work on it. It looks like bug in
combination of inheritance and rematerialization. I'll try to fix it on this
week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750
Bug ID: 118750
Summary: [14/15 Regression] ICE on associate with elemental
function with polymorphic array actual argument
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118754
Bug ID: 118754
Summary: [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr106010-8c.c by
r15-6807-g68326d5d1a593d
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> I think I have a fix for aes_xor_combine.c . Just testing it right now.
>
> In this case we have a 3->2 reduction and a simplification that has happened
> due t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
Bug ID: 118753
Summary: [15 Regression] [meta-bug] GCC 15 Regression on x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118754
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118753
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118754
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118754
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/47.html :
These
are failures like:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-14.c scan-tree-dump-not cunroll "Invalid sum"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a fix for aarch64's aes_xor_combine.c (arm fix can be implemented in a
similar fashion), this fixes the issue on the gimple level in the backend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60381
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60381&action=edit
The aarch64 patch which I am testing
This fixes gcc.target/aarch64/aes_xor_combine.c but does not fix the arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #99 from LIU Hao ---
binutils 2.44 is available in MSYS2 now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #100 from Julian Waters ---
Great! This means it should be able to compile on MSYS2 now. Ready for
integration?
Good morning,
I am an importer from Guangdong,China. Mainly engaged in fast-moving consumer
goods. I am interested in products related to smoothie. l would like to know
more about your company and hope that we can have a chance to cooperate, please
feel free to ask questions if you have any que
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118745
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a5882707df50ed29905b3c47cbaa0868ea248c9
commit r15-7366-g3a5882707df50ed29905b3c47cbaa0868ea248c9
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #14 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #13)
> (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #3)
> > The parameter register is
> > saved in a volatile register which is saved on stack in the entr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Keywords|needs-bisecti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118743
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102333
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> Created attachment 60290 [details]
> Testcase for this PR
>
> This PR seems to have been fixed in the recent past on both 14- and
> 15-branches.
>
> I will push th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118743
Bug ID: 118743
Summary: Inefficient integer calling for little-endian aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118744
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115112
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118746
Bug ID: 118746
Summary: In go FE, __builtin_unreachable does not have the
attribute cold - or any attribute, for that matter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60287|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #13 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #3)
> The parameter register is
> saved in a volatile register which is saved on stack in the entry bb.
> Instead, if the volatile register is saved just be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115112
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Also seen in the assembly output:
$ gm2 -fiso -g -fm2-whole-program -S testrestline.mod
...
.L1166:
.loc 10 133 7
nop
.L1163:
.loc 10 108 11# front end incorrectly assigns locati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118745
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
I guess it does not show in practice as '&odv->append_args_list->where' will be
implemented as '&odv->append_args_list' + offset – and the result is never
actually used. - At least, 'valgrind' does not detec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117778
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] ICE |[14 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Indeed we don't seem to split a vector in the same way:
typedef int complex_t __attribute__((vector_size(sizeof(int)*2)));
struct A {
complex_t value;
A(double r) : value{0, r} {}
};
[[gnu::noipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110370
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115112
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
$ gm2 -fiso -g -fm2-whole-program -fm2-dump=all
-fm2-dump-filter=m2iso.TextIO.ReadRestLine testrestline.mod
$ tail -15 a-testrestline.mod.002l.gimple
(*
/home/gaius/opt/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-|aarch64*
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|non-64bit integer arguments |non-64bit integer arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd3886e6692ba4b7127debcdfe4890199ec9e54
commit r15-7356-gbcd3886e6692ba4b7127debcdfe4890199ec9e54
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So just a couple thoughts.
If we look at the .expand dump we have:
(insn 23 22 24 6 (set (mem/c:QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 129 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -4 [0xfffc])) [1 MEM
[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
This is an equivalent testcase without OpenMP and especially without iostream,
making dump reading a bit easier:
using complex_t = double __complex__;
struct A {
complex_t value;
A(double r) : valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118243
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|stack locations are not |stack locations are not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116926
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c98b3825f99fcec8fd921550e2dc45f2d966cbb
commit r15-7346-g4c98b3825f99fcec8fd921550e2dc45f2d966cbb
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118719
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b2726a62ddfe958302d6790725503ac09b28f11
commit r15-7347-g4b2726a62ddfe958302d6790725503ac09b28f11
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118499
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118734
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
For rv32 can you load a v2si and vmv.v.x that as vNdi? In general I agree - it
might be also a -Os based decision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-04
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-04
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And also binary ops:
char __GIMPLE (ssa,startwith("optimized")) g1(char i)
{
char _1;
char _2;
__BB(2,guessed_local(97603132)):
_1 = i_3(D);
_2 = 1 - _1;
return _2;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
cond would still want to move into the BIND_EXPR if we remove
simplify_loop_decl_cond, but that doesn't need a distinction between the
condition scope and the com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118745
Bug ID: 118745
Summary: UBSAN: member access within null pointer of type
'struct gfc_omp_namelist' since
r15-7285-gbea86e82146b9b
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115913
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:251f6ba9131ebc8deab463c052e099a065796c2a
commit r12-10942-g251f6ba9131ebc8deab463c052e099a065796c2a
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115913
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
So Marek's patch was close, it just needs to distinguish between a
TRY_FINALLY_EXPR cleaning up the condition variable vs some other variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60374
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60374&action=edit
gcc15-pr86769-wip.patch
This is WIP what I have right now, constexpr.cc evaluation of it not done yet,
plus ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Philipp Tomsich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adf1da77593f8851c6b78d22ebbc1124bbaf1de5
commit r15-7353-gadf1da77593f8851c6b78d22ebbc1124bbaf1de5
Author: kelefth
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116845
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
One issue is that we turned (sizetype)(j + -1) * 4 to
((sizetype) j + 1073741823) * 4 which makes CSE of j + -1 difficult.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c8c9c9ee22bdb306439020a5a8fc5b4ee935f5b
commit r15-7352-g4c8c9c9ee22bdb306439020a5a8fc5b4ee935f5b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
Bug ID: 118739
Summary: wrong code at -O{s,3} with "-fno-tree-forwprop
-fno-tree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057
Bug 101057 depends on bug 118742, which changed state.
Bug 118742 Summary: No way to do ~a for a boolean type with the gimple FE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118739
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #6 from Uroš
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118740
Bug ID: 118740
Summary: [OpenMP] 'sorry' used without location data
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118741
Bug ID: 118741
Summary: [OpenMP] metadirectives for declarative use rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, rejects-valid
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118742
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> And also binary ops:
>
> char __GIMPLE (ssa,startwith("optimized")) g1(char i)
> {
> char _1;
> char _2;
>
> __BB(2,guessed_local(97603132)):
> _1 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:887bdabfe3e315d661bed55800cd4f64542c7029
commit r15-7348-g887bdabfe3e315d661bed55800cd4f64542c7029
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117113
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0675eb17480bada678bf2769d39732027abcd6d0
commit r15-7349-g0675eb17480bada678bf2769d39732027abcd6d0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
