https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118607
Bug ID: 118607
Summary: gcov-tool merge weights must be integers, while help
command suggest users to use floats
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f4592ae95eed53dc3a370f98c04a8f25f007811
commit r15-7123-g6f4592ae95eed53dc3a370f98c04a8f25f007811
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115662
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
The top-level object in a .sarif file is a sarifLog, and this contains zero of
more runs:
https://docs.oasis-open.org/sarif/sarif/v2.1.0/errata01/os/sarif-v2.1.0-errata01-os-complete.html#_Toc141790732
So o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118560
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(Thanks Christophe Lyon for pointing out this bugzilla to me).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116256
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So what's left here is the dup-{1,2,3} cases.
IMHO this all ties back to the constant synthesis problem. They can be fixed
by removing the mvconst_internal pattern -- but that leads to a new set of
regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116448
--- Comment #2 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
Thanks Richard. I'll give it a try with -Os and create a patch with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
On top if r15-7055-g459816efa13d9d I added a patch adding a
dbg_counter to limit the updates.
The slow-down is caused by two updates of value ranges in jump
function, both of which are necessary to get the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115439
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115439
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
Patch proposal:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673791.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118606
Bug ID: 118606
Summary: gcc/omp-general.cc:3294: Possible precedence problem
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e13e751d8144c9cfb7a9f1cd38119d1fa4ab38cf
commit r15-7122-ge13e751d8144c9cfb7a9f1cd38119d1fa4ab38cf
Author: Simon Martin
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118485
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118610
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118610
Bug ID: 118610
Summary: [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr85467.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118485
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 118509, which changed state.
Bug 118509 Summary: [14 regression] Front-end produced uninitialized memory
reference when compiling Nektar since r15-4595-gb25d3201b6338d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118509
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118604
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116448
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443
Bug 118443 depends on bug 117186, which changed state.
Bug 117186 Summary: [12/13 Regression] aarch64 wrong code for (a < b) < (b < a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, it isn't enough though.
This build something and only check if it is valid later way has its drawbacks.
// PR c++/118590
// { dg-do compile }
template
struct A
{
int z;
};
template
struct B
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3228df20cfa3581015dc32657eb17d6f24af3104
commit r14-11237-g3228df20cfa3581015dc32657eb17d6f24af3104
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118184
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51761b3b8b98e1b9ca02ae293de00644da83b85d
commit r14-11236-g51761b3b8b98e1b9ca02ae293de00644da83b85d
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb828691fe692f9df002a2e3757a1aec68857e85
commit r15-7127-gcb828691fe692f9df002a2e3757a1aec68857e85
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
Bug ID: 118611
Summary: LRA inserts unneeded reload on FMA chain
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Unfortunately I have lost access to the machine where I was debugging this due
to some networking issue. Just before that I have discovered that an extra SLP
vectorization in the slow version of the hottest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118184
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118608
Bug ID: 118608
Summary: [14/15 regression][mips64] Lack of sign extension with
-Os after r14-6915
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118609
Bug ID: 118609
Summary: gcc.target/i386/amxmovrs-t2rpntlvw-2.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118609
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118403
--- Comment #14 from Stephen Hemminger ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
> (In reply to Stephen Hemminger from comment #12)
>
> What does `gcc --version` give?
$ gcc-15 --version
gcc-15 (GCC) 15.0.0 2024 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 60238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60238&action=edit
C99 test case that fails on ordinary AVRs (not avrtiny)
This test case fails on ordinary AVRs like -mmcu=at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118067
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18)
> The latest change made for this PR has introduced a number of regressions on
> the SPARC of the form:
FAOD, the referred "latest change" is:
commit r15-6968-gd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118067
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118610
Bug 118610 depends on bug 118067, which changed state.
Bug 118067 Summary: [15 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at
lra-assigns.cc:1860 (unable to find a register to spill) {*lshrhi3_1} with -O
-fno-split-wide-types -mavx512f
https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to me from comment #7)
> (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #6)
> > commit r15-7078-g5cd4605141b8b45cab95e4de8005c69273071107
> > Author: Denis Chertykov
> > Date: Tue Jan 21 00:27:04 2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118606
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118604
Bug ID: 118604
Summary: gcc/cp/parser.cc:51316: Non clear code produces clang
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118199
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.0, 13.3.0, 14.2.0
--- Comment #18 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Bug ID: 118605
Summary: gcc/tree-assume.cc:108: dangling field problem
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118067
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118610
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 82304, which changed state.
Bug 82304 Summary: GCC compiles constexpr function with double reinterpret_cast
in a constant context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82304
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82304
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118097
--- Comment #33 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a patch on the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6frlax0fz@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594
--- Comment #8 from Richard Sandiford ---
I was going to say that force_subreg should call force_operand:
diff --git a/gcc/explow.cc b/gcc/explow.cc
index 7799a98053b..3f378174268 100644
--- a/gcc/explow.cc
+++ b/gcc/explow.cc
@@ -759,7 +759,9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602
--- Comment #4 from Peter Damianov ---
>From what I can tell this applies to all integers:
bool f (int c)
{
return (0xc000 & c) == 0x8000;
}
has the same transformation applied
What clang does is valid because the function is chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
Denis Chertykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 117868, which changed state.
Bug 117868 Summary: [avr][lra] Wrong code with -mlra in simd-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 117868, which changed state.
Bug 117868 Summary: [avr][lra] Wrong code with -mlra in simd-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117868
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118497
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I wonder if the patch in r15-2810-g3c67a0fa1dd39a3378deb854a7fef0ff7fe38004
> (which was reverted due to a bootstrap failure on aarch64) fixes this one
> too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118614
Bug ID: 118614
Summary: [riscv] Naked function attribute on riscv optimizes
away C conditional
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117827
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That regressed
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/aggregate1.C -std=c++98 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/aggregate1.C -std=c++11 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/aggregate1.C -std=c++14 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/aggregat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115769
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6db9d4e954bff3dfd926c7c9b71e41e47b7089c8
commit r15-7128-g6db9d4e954bff3dfd926c7c9b71e41e47b7089c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118502
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
> It's nice to see Surya's patch finally actually helping other targets than
> rs6000. That said...
>
>
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Patch f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118614
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118602
--- Comment #5 from Peter Damianov ---
I meant to say:
1011
is -65 in the previous comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118613
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> The following partial patch seems to fix the rank-2 cases here by forcing
> a temporary that gets reused:
This prints:
4 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118613
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following partial patch seems to fix the rank-2 cases here by forcing
a temporary that gets reused:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
index afbec5b2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118562
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118613
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Adding a second temporary reduces the evaluation count for the rank-1 case
further:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
index afbec5b2752..0cdc886a715 100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Depe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think this is the same as PR 82237.
Or at least related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I think this is the same as PR 82237.
>
> Or at least related.
I'm not sure, in this one the instructions hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118396
--- Comment #17 from Carlos Galvez ---
(FYI I'm trying to test this but now I get out-of-memory errors when trying to
compile a single .cpp file, will test with a newer patch in case it got fixed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118612
Bug ID: 118612
Summary: return value loaded despite noreturn attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118613
Bug ID: 118613
Summary: maxval/minval may evaluate argument too often
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Petazzoni ---
Is there any update about this patch? Should consider Microblaze
unmaintained/broken, and possibly drop support for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118614
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118502
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118594
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #8)
> But that doesn't work because force_operand considers the subreg to be valid
> (and general_operand agrees). So if this isn't a regression, it might be
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118615
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> My bet is on r15-6661 then.
That was my next guess anyways and you would be correct,
that is:
r15-6661-gc5db3f50bdf34e works
Now to start bisecting when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118497
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vmakarov at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118572
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118609
--- Comment #1 from Haochen Jiang ---
I am going to revise the testcase through the thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/674157.html
Dup with PR118270
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118270
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118270
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118609
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118613
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 60243
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60243&action=edit
Preliminary patch
This does the job and fixes the rank-1 case. Regtests ok.
Still need to adjust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118595
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick at rivosinc dot com
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117827
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/cp/init.cc.jj 2025-01-02 11:47:10.771493771 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/init.cc 2025-01-22 17:56:48.268704123 +0100
@@ -4530,6 +4530,7 @@ build_vec_init (tree base, tree maxindex
tree obase = base;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118595
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Lu ---
bisected to r15-3228-g771256bcb9d as the first bad commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Bug 116028 depends on bug 118615, which changed state.
Bug 118615 Summary: [15 Regression] Bootstrap failure on aarch64 after r15-2810
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118615
What|Removed |Added
---
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
