https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118611
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I think this is the same as PR 82237. > > Or at least related. I'm not sure, in this one the instructions have a strict dependency chain, so scheduling can't do anything different here. This one seems to be more about how lra has resolved the tie for the 0 constraint in the instructions.
