https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117562
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #10)
> >
> > I do wonder about the usefulness of the memory alternative on the
> > sse_movhlps pattern though, there's the sse_storehps pattern which
> > also models
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #3 from Nikl Kelbon ---
Note: its preprocessed sources for another bug with placement new / RVO in
coroutines, i dont know how it placed in my old issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #2 from Nikl Kelbon ---
There are preprocessed sources
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/pull/105#issuecomment-2493465483
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117731
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 59668
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59668&action=edit
gcc15-pr117731.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117715
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83397
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
It would be useful to fix the pessimisation for the benefit of projects built
with older autoconf (no autoconf release yet made defaults to C23, for example)
or build systems with a hardcoded -std=gnu99 or simila
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697
--- Comment #9 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
> > --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang ---
> > Testcase fixed on trunk.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> > Since I do not have a Solaris machine, I could n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117722
--- Comment #13 from Robin Dapp ---
I don't fully understand yet :)
So the full-register moves are undesirable, I agree. When accumulating with a
widening op they seem unavoidable, though. The only alternative would be to
split out the extens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #85 from LIU Hao ---
Created attachment 59666
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59666&action=edit
libstdc++ fix
It is not possible to export a `__thread` variable with native TLS, because
it's not possible to acces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|void f() { } has zero |void f() { } has zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
I think that's fine. I still plan to play with that plugin experiment but I was
waiting for other patches to go in, and now occupied with C23 porting :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
--- Comment #13 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
No worries, I'd be really surprised if volatile offsets show up in the testing
at all, let alone be significant enough to warrant the rewrite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
--- Comment #8 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
(In reply to avieira from comment #7)
> @Torbjorn: OK to close?
Yes, this is ok on trunk, but should it also be backported to releases/gcc-14?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117562
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> > vec_unpacks_hi_v4sf create an unintialized (reg:V4SF 853), I guess it may
> > confuse LRA to allocate a mem for it.
>
> For simple case
> void
> foo (double* a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang ---
> Testcase fixed on trunk.
Great, thanks.
> Since I do not have a Solaris machine, I could not to solve the problem on
> Solaris/x86 for:
>
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116463
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116463
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9473f9c6f2d755d2eb79dbd30877e64b4bc6fc8
commit r15-5585-ga9473f9c6f2d755d2eb79dbd30877e64b4bc6fc8
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117715
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117734
Bug ID: 117734
Summary: Misses VNNI pmaddubsw qi->hi dot_prod
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117735
Bug ID: 117735
Summary: SLP dot_prod opportunity in 525.x264_r
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117735
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Other "failures" for this loop nest is choosing an alias versioning check that
is invariant in the outer loop so we'd version that instead of just the inner
loop. We also fail to implement (or schedule) un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117732
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 59669
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59669&action=edit
gcc15-pr117731.patch
Untested fix. We don't develop the sanitizer code inside of GCC and all we
care about is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117732
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Introduced with:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/
> ed9ef9b4f248c62022bb1bebe5e2597cb4f9d209
>
> So a 15 regression.
I'm sure I've been seeing this f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117732
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36503
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #21972|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117731
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83397
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-12-12 00:00:00 |2024-11-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117562
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao Liu ---
>
> I do wonder about the usefulness of the memory alternative on the
> sse_movhlps pattern though, there's the sse_storehps pattern which
> also models the store part more precisely as V2SFmode. Is
> sse_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117731
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #2)
> I also notice that but why the warning does not appear previously since it
> is always using gnu14?
because the merge (r15-5164-gfa321004f3f628) from upstream b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100627
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59665
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59665&action=edit
testcase
Also next time please attach the testcase or put it inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117731
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #2)
> > I also notice that but why the warning does not appear previously since it
> > is always using gnu14?
>
> becaus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
>> Even more strangely, I'd tried an i686-pc-linux-gnu build with
>> --enable-frame-pointer (the Solaris default), which showed the testsuite
>> failures before your patch, but still -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117165
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6d1fdcf953a79d1e3ef2d28c99c1933d1e07d80
commit r15-5587-gd6d1fdcf953a79d1e3ef2d28c99c1933d1e07d80
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #86 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #83)
> Uros: I see, I'll try to do so. I was mainly avoiding that to break less
> code (I have a habit of doing that to anything I touch). Although, the
> resulting ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
Bug ID: 117736
Summary: Internal error checking coroutine final suspend self
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
ขออนุญาตผู้ดูเเลเเละเจ้าของกิจการด้วยครับ
ของผมจะเป็นการเสนอเงินทุนเพื่อเจ้าของธุรกิจ
ที่มีการจดทะเบียนในรูปแบบบริษัท
หจก โรงงานอุตสาหกรรม ทั่วประเทศ
ดอกเบี้ยต่ำ เริ่มต้นที่ 1-1.5%
สอบถามฟรีพนักงานสุภาพ
0626697879 (ผู้จัดการฝ่ายการเงิน)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114541
Heiko Eißfeldt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko at hexco dot de
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117724
--- Comment #5 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Preliminary patch (but does not cover all similar cases):
diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
index 1da06c7d4e9..453b56cc37c 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree.cc
@@ -13977,6 +13977,9 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117730
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I looked at the fortran dump, and also at the verbose asm, comparing
with and w/o non_overridable.
module2 has permuted(?) vtab entries:
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@
.quad 0
# _deallocate:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fd8cd1990e0f5bac416bafc8a588d05c735f000
commit r14-10965-g9fd8cd1990e0f5bac416bafc8a588d05c735f000
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117732
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59669|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing. Note the preprocessed source does not work on the trunk but that is
due to an incompatibility with the older libstdc++ part rather than your code I
think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117641
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44984f7f7523f136085ba60fd107ba8309d4115b
commit r15-5593-g44984f7f7523f136085ba60fd107ba8309d4115b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117420
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c25c172959e7fb424455ee6acc60571c68b72443
commit r15-5594-gc25c172959e7fb424455ee6acc60571c68b72443
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59672
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59672&action=edit
Testcase
Compressed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc -fhardened -Wl,-z,lazy |`-fhardened -Wl,-z,lazy`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117737
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted to remove INCLUDE_MEMORY from everywhere:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669828.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
Steven Munroe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59291|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
--- Comment #15 from Steven Munroe ---
Found where handling of vec_splat_u32 constant shift counts are handled
differently across the various shift/rotate intrinsics.
Even for the 5-bit shift counts (the easy case) the behavior of the various
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117718
--- Comment #5 from Steven Munroe ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #3)
> No, the issue is with DQ addressing (i.e. vector load/store with offset), we
> can't guarantee that the external address will be properly aligned with the
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115540
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8701cdbf8df3f746df85882878beb8e8f897b014
commit r14-10967-g8701cdbf8df3f746df85882878beb8e8f897b014
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87850
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114021
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117739
Bug ID: 117739
Summary: gcc -fhardened -Wl,-z,lazy unexpectadly links binary
with immediate binding (-z now)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
There is a nasty subtlety: the pattern is not vcond_mask but vcond_mask_ with a
trailing underscore!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117718
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The address for lxv and lxvx can be anything. The *offset* in the address for
lxv has to be a multiple of sixteen. This isn't any different from DS-mode
(well,
multiple of 4 there), and we have DQ-mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117603
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eeff504238aeb4a9a20a9e445307b6773adb6f01
commit r15-5591-geeff504238aeb4a9a20a9e445307b6773adb6f01
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117727
--- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers ---
As nullptr_t is in C23, arguably psABIs ought to define the representation of
nullptr_t as part of defining the C ABI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nikl Kelbon from comment #2)
> There are preprocessed sources
>
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/pull/105#issuecomment-2493465483
Next time you could compress them using xz, gzip, bzip2, zi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115536
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3adceba04eddf8c6e21fda3f7d0f8015e17bf5d8
commit r14-10966-g3adceba04eddf8c6e21fda3f7d0f8015e17bf5d8
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #35 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1
commit r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
--- Comment #27 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1
commit r15-5595-g27778979c9a1e32a6ca74e5b5f377385225449b1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117355
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117355
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:684595188dea02d246edb66106d82bb7a9a22d79
commit r15-5597-g684595188dea02d246edb66106d82bb7a9a22d79
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112841
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84a335eb4f9641a471184d86900609dd97215218
commit r15-5598-g84a335eb4f9641a471184d86900609dd97215218
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112841
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117726
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:939362411d0903542647dae0eff82db10a3ad78a
commit r15-5599-g939362411d0903542647dae0eff82db10a3ad78a
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117573
Tarik Ibrahimović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tarik.ibrahimovic@chili-chi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117573
--- Comment #3 from Tarik Ibrahimović ---
Created attachment 59676
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59676&action=edit
Disassembly of the program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117573
--- Comment #4 from Tarik Ibrahimović ---
Hi,
I'm hereby providing a testcase for the reported bug.
The bug is that there is a full-word misaligned store to address 0x1517 when
compiler optimizations are used (-02 in specific). In case of no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117153
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Candidate fix:
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc
@@ -1960,7 +1960,10 @@ build_anon_union_vars (tree type, tree object)
if (processing_template_decl)
ref = build_min_nt_loc (UNKNOWN_LOC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88190
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117741
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90260
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117603
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103541
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
All done?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df2e832c90fe0915c0ab89e5c115bd0c6536c833
commit r15-5602-gdf2e832c90fe0915c0ab89e5c115bd0c6536c833
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Nov 22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117740
Bug ID: 117740
Summary: libgcov-util.c should be renamed to libgcov-util.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117737
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3f1b9e2aa079f8ec73e3cb48143a16645c49566
commit r15-5603-gb3f1b9e2aa079f8ec73e3cb48143a16645c49566
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82630
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117732
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33532
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aa4162e365023896ebf6ed56bf0a00994c50639
commit r15-5606-g4aa4162e365023896ebf6ed56bf0a00994c50639
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-23
Status|UNCONFIRM
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo