https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117321
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you need libc support for full f16 support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Another spurios "may be |[14/15 Regression] Another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117322
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So adding:
if ((long)(len*4) <= 0) return;
Fixes the warning.
Looks like GCC does not realize len can't be too big to overflow.
I am not 100% sure if the warning should be better worded or there is a mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
--- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> I also suspect `b backtrace_function`
> will work correctly and point to the locations, it is just printing of the
> value of backtrace_function which is broken.
Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312
--- Comment #4 from H. Peter Anvin ---
You would think so, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117286
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Li Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75caa17f5cb4e414919baff0435300b549a76eca
commit r15-4712-g75caa17f5cb4e414919baff0435300b549a76eca
Author: xuli
Date: Mon Oct 28 04:41:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114127
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
This is probably good enough:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
index 63e17f480a4..5e0afc10e09 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb
@@ -1063,8 +1063,7 @@ packa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59458|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113037
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117314
Bug ID: 117314
Summary: [RISC-V] Miscompilation triggered by segment
load-store, GCC 14.2.0 at `-O0`.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117145
--- Comment #11 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/666590.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100420
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117316
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117283
xuli1 at eswincomputing dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xuli1 at eswincomputin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117324
Bug ID: 117324
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in
break_out_target_exprs(tree_node*, bool)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117323
Bug ID: 117323
Summary: GCC failed to optimize value / 128 to value >> 7 when
the range of value must be positive
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117310
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14907
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 117310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117325
Bug ID: 117325
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at
cp/pt.cc:21986
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #415 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #414)
> I've merged this patch into commit "SH: Try to workaround fp-reg related
> move insns pt.2" and added the reduced test case from comment #413.
>
> It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
The allocation indirection makes it hard to see if it's legal..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is always more and slower code. Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69381
--- Comment #3 from Claudiu Zissulescu ---
This is a very old issue. I see no problem with the latest gcc14.x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
above (`g++ -std=c++23 na16test.cpp`) produces a
linker error (listed below) indicating that the `nextafterf16` symbol is
undefined. The Compiler Explorer site can show this at
https://godbolt.org/z/Wz5cn5nbn.
ASM generation compiler returned: 0
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20241027/bin/../li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117305
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117322
Bug ID: 117322
Summary: Another spurios "may be used uninitialized" warning
when using alloca.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
--- Comment #3 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does it happen in a full linked binary or just in the object file?
The bug occurs in both, though of course I see different values for the
backtrace_function addr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59465&action=edit
Slightly more reduced
Note if Comparable is not a template, this works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117313
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112979
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
This appears to be sufficient:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
index 0c25c95c80e..7ee28b0a602 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch8.adb
@@ -8535,7 +8535,7 @@ package
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112979
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59456|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117318
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |liuhongt at gcc dot
gnu.org
E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59457|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Bug ID: 117315
Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] Wireshark miscompiled with
LTO since r11-5391-gbb07490abba850
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59456&action=edit
wireshark-ipa.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Initial instructions were slightly wrong:
```
$ gcc -Og -ggdb3 -flto=auto -fno-strict-aliasing wmem_allocator_strict.c
wmem_core.c wmem_tree.c -o libwsutil.so -Wl,-z,lazy -shared
$ gcc -O2 -ggdb3 -flto=auto -fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I'm going to try reduce it more now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113868
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
A small oversight:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/par-ch6.adb b/gcc/ada/par-ch6.adb
index 7fe43373535..c3cc5725616 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/par-ch6.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/par-ch6.adb
@@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ package body Ch6 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117316
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113781
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113868
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114300
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117316
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114300
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
This should work on mainline:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_ch7.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_ch7.adb
index 640ad5c60b8..ee948e0934b 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_ch7.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_ch7.adb
@@ -2522,7 +2522,11 @@ package
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed8ca972f8857869d2bb4a416994bb896eb1c34e
commit r15-4702-ged8ca972f8857869d2bb4a416994bb896eb1c34e
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sun O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE |[13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113781
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bug box on array|internal error on naked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114713
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113868
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-02-14 00:00:00 |2024-10-27
--- Comment #2 from Eric Bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression]
|-fc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
Bug ID: 117317
Summary: An internal compiler error on call to virtual
constexpr function via comparison operator in CRTP
with multiple inheritance
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117317
--- Comment #1 from Amir Kirsh ---
A more simple example, same internal compiler error:
class Base {
public:
constexpr bool operator==(const Base& b) const {
return getIdentity() == b.getIdentity();
}
private:
constexpr virt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89786
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Did anything happen about this ?
Yes, classified as pathological case and epsilon priority.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101027
Martin Hořeňovský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.horenovsky+gccbugzil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59459|0 |1
is obsolete|
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r15-4700-202410270017288ee29886-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241027 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117265
--- Comment #16 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Except there is no load or store anywhere (see the case on comment 12), so I
don't understand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112821
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112524
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal error on |internal error on iterated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59463
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59463&action=edit
Testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
And that is partly documented too:
from
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-malloc-function-attribute
:
Attribute malloc indicates that a function is malloc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b281e13ecad12d07209924a7282c53be3a1c3774
commit r15-4709-gb281e13ecad12d07209924a7282c53be3a1c3774
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> And that is partly documented too:
> from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.
> html#index-malloc-function-attribute :
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117316
Bug ID: 117316
Summary: [15 regression] gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc:479:1:
error: could not convert ‘...’ from ‘’ to ‘const riscv_tune_param’
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117316
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression]
|gcc/conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113972
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The testcase is rejected on the mainline because of AI22-0002-1, which is a
Binding Interpretation and thus is retroactively applied to Ada 2022:
http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai22s/ai22-0002-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117305
Joakim Rosqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Joakim Rosq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89786
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> I'll have a look.
Did anything happen about this ?
Bug still seems to be present.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113972
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113781
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-02-14 00:00:00 |2024-10-27
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed8ca972f8857869d2bb4a416994bb896eb1c34e
commit r15-4702-ged8ca972f8857869d2bb4a416994bb896eb1c34e
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113781
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
For example:
p.adb:20:51: error: missing intermediate array aggregate
xtra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241027 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117315
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have to double check something but this might be an abusing the malloc
attribute.
Specifically this part: "moreover no pointers to valid objects occur in any
storage addressed by P."
which is violated b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117312
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Summary|vector ABSU is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
Bug ID: 117320
Summary: wrong debug info for function with cold alternative
(-g -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117303
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect this might be a front end bug. The decls for the two functions
> should be the same but I think they are different and that is causing the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112601
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Looking at `can_inline_edge_p()` I noticed that generally `gcc` disallows
inlining callee's that call `comdat_local`:
static bool
can_inline_edge_p (struct cgraph_edge *e, bool report, bool early =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117318
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Similar happens with __builtin_ia32_pmovsqw128mem_mask():
$ cat testcase-min0.i
int foo0_u32_0;
__attribute__((__vector_size__(2 * sizeof(long long long foo0_v128s64_0;
char foo0_ret;
void foo0() {
__b
94 matches
Mail list logo
