https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
Bug ID: 117124
Summary: Header file contents get modified when macro defined
before header file inclusion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>If I #define with any macro which is also available in the header files,
Yes that is expected and the behavior that the C standard preprocessor does.
For define extern, GCC should most likely warn about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
"If the program defines a reserved identifier or attribute token described in
6.7.12.1 as a macro name,
or removes (with #undef) any macro definition of an identifier in the first
group listed above or
attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117125
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Please keep in mind the comment I made wrt screenshots. It's OK if they're
complementary but please try to avoid them by themselves.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117126
Bug ID: 117126
Summary: GCC 14 generates redundant movq xmm1, xmm1
instructions with -O2 optimization, leading to code
bloat (regression from GCC 13.x)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117118
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117125
Bug ID: 117125
Summary: No error by if it terminating comment only provided
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117126
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-10-01 00:00:00 |2024-10-13
--- Comment #4 from Sam James -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #5)
> I believe this is causing application of std::views::transform() not to
> model the underlying view's category, since its iterators can't return an
> lvalue.
No,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Keywords are not reserved identifiers, so for some reason C doesn't say this is
undefined.
I suppose you just get what you deserve when you replace 'extern' with
something that makes the program ill-forme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117124
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
But the functions he redefines are, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117127
Bug ID: 117127
Summary: Feature request: Warning on useless 'const' in a
function declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović ---
You need -fext-numeric-literals or a GNU C++ -std - the original was built with
-std=gnu++20.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117110
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
--- Comment #6 from Fiodar ---
I look for floating modes in symbian SDK docs.
Here link(now that site and webarchive down) -
https://docs.huihoo.com/symbian/nokia-symbian3-developers-library-v0.8/GUID-D525B9A9-6B32-535B-A282-60C85A48D3FB.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8ac855f796b0cf47d80c713d2f01943dffec0b7
commit r14-10780-gd8ac855f796b0cf47d80c713d2f01943dffec0b7
Author: Sam James
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117094
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
richi or honza: can I test and queue backports for the IPA fixes (the slew from
the other month, inc. this one) at least for 13, possibly 12 but don't mind
waiting more there?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
--- Comment #8 from Alfredo Correa ---
FWIIW, this is the origin of the problem,
https://gitlab.com/correaa/boost-multi#broadcast-infinite-views, implementing
an iterator type that supports stride == 0.
This doesn't form a proper random access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92900
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> possibly related to bug 60972
...and, from the other direction, bug 68160 and bug 36566
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 59340
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59340&action=edit
patch under test
The coroutines implementation (intentionally) did not include support for ({})
which is an ext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117114
--- Comment #4 from Simon Martin ---
Submitted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665222.html to
restore the rust front-end build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116600
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116589
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
What's remaining?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117116
Bug ID: 117116
Summary: error: unrecognizable insn: with -march=znver3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116061
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116481
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1506027347776a2f6ec5b92d56ef192e85944e2e
commit r15-4299-g1506027347776a2f6ec5b92d56ef192e85944e2e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 116064, which changed state.
Bug 116064 Summary: [15 Regression] SPEC 2017 523.xalancbmk_r failed to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116053
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115933
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115815
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115869
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117112
--- Comment #2 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Thank you very much for your reply.
> I'm not sure whether you think the bug is that the compiler doesn't see
> arr1[i] is equal to 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Calling cse_insn() for
(insn 99 98 100 12 (set (reg:SI 138)
(const_int 1 [0x1])) "t.c":9:31 1507 {*movsi_zarch}
(nil))
results in a call to insert_regs() where we have
(gdb) ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117095
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Created attachment 59331
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59331&action=edit
cse2 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117112
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024, 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117112
>
> --- Comment #2 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
> (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117050
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109918
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
This breaks building the rust compiler.
In file included from ../../gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-tyty.h:28,
from ../../gcc/rust/backend/rust-mangle.h:21,
from ../../gcc/rust/ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117117
Bug ID: 117117
Summary: [15 regression] rust build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117117
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117114
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #5 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109918
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||117114
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109918
Bug 109918 depends on bug 117117, which changed state.
Bug 117117 Summary: [15 regression] rust build fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117117
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116213
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> In this case, I suspect the warning might be legit, but bisected to
> r14-3460-gabf915193fbf72 anyway.
Was this with the reduced testcase or the original one?
With
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117123
Bug ID: 117123
Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] Generated code at -Os on
trunk is larger than GCC 14.4
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676
--- Comment #6 from Avi Kivity ---
My reproducer:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
void f() {
auto stream = std::stringstream("aaa bbb");
auto src = std::ranges::subrange(std::istream_iterator(stream),
std::istream_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106676
Avi Kivity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avi at scylladb dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo