https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96505
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> f1 is diagnosed since GCC 12...
since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8d87f47af78f07b5ce513bfe6, which changed
gimple-ssa-warn-access to run a few more times...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100717
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
This seems to work now, presumably the same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96505#c2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Bug ID: 116795
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu:
verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Bug ID: 116796
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 with
"-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-ch"
on x86_64-linux-gnu: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97383
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note clang is worse than GCC here:
clang with libc++ does:
:8:3: error: no matching function for call to object of type 'const
__sort'
With libstdc++ clang does:
:8:3: error: no matching function for call t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
libjxl as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116795
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116796
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115673
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-06-27 00:00:00 |2024-9-21
--- Comment #8 from Sam James --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #283 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #276)
> Current my assumption on the sfunc issue: LRA doesn't handle the clobber
> hard reg pattern if that hard reg is recognized as the input reg. I don't
> kn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116775
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Heh, I thought you forgot the manual, but -mlra apparently never was
> mentioned
> in there anyway :-)
Uff you almost had me there, i.e., if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #291 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #285)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #284)
> > (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #283)
> ...
> > > It turned out that the c#276 version of block_lump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #292 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #289)
> I've reconstructed patches as follows:
>
> [59157] a revised patch to movsf issue which splits movesf_ie_ra
> [59158] a revised patch to QIHI e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Another example this shows is for gcc.dg/vect/slp-42.c - we definitely can
> do the interleaving scheme as non-SLP vectorization shows.
>
> gcc.dg/vect/slp-4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116785
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Note r15-792-gf0a02467bbc35a is a fix for correctness.
I'm waiting for a better reduction - I'd suggest you reduce the function
with the kernel itself manually and use creduce only to reduce the
rest of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
Bug ID: 116787
Summary: [14/15 Regression] No longer recognizes vector maxps
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I was going to say that libfmt upstream is wrong to say it's a regression,
> but it looks like they never claimed that.
Maybe I misread it, but:
https://gith
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #290 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #263)
> Created attachment 59132 [details]
> a patch rewriting movsh_ie_ra
>
> This patch splits movsf_ie_ra into several new patterns to remove
> matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116788
Bug ID: 116788
Summary: Relative sysroot and -save-temps don't play nicely
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |acoplan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114742
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
OK, then ALT128_COMPAT is effectively only for LE.
So I think I'll make whatever change is needed so that ALT128_COMPAT isn't
defined for power6 LE and power7 LE, so the errors Matthias found don't happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the key to notice here is the regular interleaving knows there's enough
vectors to perform two-vector to one permutes within the same group and
we only have a single child for the VEC_PERM_EXPR which for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116738
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:624d3af025e820ede7ec4334f7a2d5d4731c99a9
commit r15-3728-g624d3af025e820ede7ec4334f7a2d5d4731c99a9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Eh - sizeof (4 * sizeof (float)). So this is about emulated V2SF, it still
regressed though but probably correctly so because of sNaNs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
That said, it works fine with vector_size (4 * sizeof (float)) aka "real" V4SF.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85919
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
To summarize the main issue was around the fact that the x86 backend supports
two distinct mask_gather_load differing only in the mode of the _mask_ but
OPTAB_CD(mask_gather_load_optab, "mask_gather_load$a$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 13 manages
;; Generating RTL for gimple basic block 2
;; _4 = .VCOND (x_2(D), y_3(D), y_3(D), x_2(D), 108);
(insn 7 6 0 (set (reg:V2SF 82 [ ])
(unspec:V2SF [
(reg/v:V2SF 84 [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
I agree, dropped. One can see the full dependency graph via BZ anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> typedef float v4sf __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof (4 * sizeof
> (float);
>
> v4sf
> foo (v4sf x, v4sf y)
> {
> return x < y ? y : x;
> }
>
> is no lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116782
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Note the vectorizer would need to learn how to operate both modes, IFN and
builtin, at the same time - at the moment it makes its life too easy there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> > typedef float v4sf __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof (4 * sizeof
> > (float);
> >
> > v4sf
> > foo (v4sf x,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Heh, I thought you forgot the manual, but -mlra apparently never was mentioned
in there anyway :-)
Thanks for the help pulling GCC kicking and streaming into the 21st century!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #4)
> Maybe I misread it, but:
> https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/issues/4160#issuecomment-2350140965
But that says bug, not regression.
> Sorry, I was not aware of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh, and constexpr std::string isn't supported either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-20
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
as noted in several places; the long-term solution for Darwin (in general since
there's an installed /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib even on modern systems) - is
for use to use an inline namespace for libstdc++ (al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116787
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82420
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99708
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #40 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
r15-3729-g0be3f4546f9b92 fixes up the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108640
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #286 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 59157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59157&action=edit
a revised patch to movsf issue which splits movesf_ie_ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #285 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #284)
> (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #283)
...
> > It turned out that the c#276 version of block_lump_real_i4 works correctly
> > in only the limited cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #287 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 59158
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59158&action=edit
a revised patch to QIHI extend/move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #288 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 59159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59159&action=edit
a revised workaround sfunc issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-20
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #289 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
I've reconstructed patches as follows:
[59157] a revised patch to movsf issue which splits movesf_ie_ra
[59158] a revised patch to QIHI extend/move
[59159] a revised workaround sfunc issue
[59153] Alex's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116397
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d0e46a939f3840f810f071037e543a6249c06fe
commit r15-3732-g5d0e46a939f3840f810f071037e543a6249c06fe
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116578
Bug 116578 depends on bug 116397, which changed state.
Bug 116397 Summary: [15 Regression] slp-reduc-3.c fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116397
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09a52cf036ba8f2fa7b60b18ba58ca17ffa1b146
commit r15-3733-g09a52cf036ba8f2fa7b60b18ba58ca17ffa1b146
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932
Bug 113932 depends on bug 113953, which changed state.
Bug 113953 Summary: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
Bug ID: 116789
Summary: Internal compiler error for non-type template
parameter to alias template inside macro
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee3efe06c9c49c04eaa4e195a7ae8774a1b3faa2
commit r15-3741-gee3efe06c9c49c04eaa4e195a7ae8774a1b3faa2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking through my logs the tests stopped failing sometime between r14-2132 and
r14-2263. I think we can close this unless you want me to find where they
stopped failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 59163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59163&action=edit
Initial patch to enable lra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 59164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59164&action=edit
Preproccessed source
We have lra crash with this source.
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/cc1 -fpreprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
Bug ID: 116791
Summary: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:910
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Testing a fix for the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
This code in pa_emit_move_sequence is reload specific (reg_equiv_mem):
if (scratch_reg
&& reload_in_progress
&& GET_CODE (operand0) == REG
&& REGNO (operand0) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in operator[], at |[15 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks to be fixed on the trunk. Will reduce in a few.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109126
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes but for the function template case if I want to use it in constexpr I add
'constexpr' and it's implicitly inline. For the variable template
specialisation it's already constexpr, and I can't define it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793
Bug ID: 116793
Summary: ice in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3309
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe just a post processing of json is needed instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
lra crashes on this insn:
(insn 524 38 523 5 (set (reg:DI 106 [ _16 ])
(reg:DI 321 [orig:106 _16 ] [106]))
"../../../gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.c":276:4 81 {*pa.md:4260}
(nil))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-20
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116679
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 116492, which changed state.
Bug 116492 Summary: inherited constructors with concept in subclass overrides
constructor in subclass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 116492, which changed state.
Bug 116492 Summary: inherited constructors with concept in subclass overrides
constructor in subclass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb25c5dd6b315dc216c7a5640dc89c5d74ffea34
commit r12-10720-gcb25c5dd6b315dc216c7a5640dc89c5d74ffea34
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3604d9cab9bb9fe6a3c642385c816211b8f2be5d
commit r13-9048-g3604d9cab9bb9fe6a3c642385c816211b8f2be5d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116726
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9227a64495d5594613604573b72422e8e3722fc5
commit r15-3745-g9227a64495d5594613604573b72422e8e3722fc5
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116794
Bug ID: 116794
Summary: gcc -pipe does not work on macOS with as from Xcode 16
(on macOS 15)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116492
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:659f32ea9de57661f8a37dcfb0b9a01bfe29acce
commit r14-10696-g659f32ea9de57661f8a37dcfb0b9a01bfe29acce
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abdea396e12e66185d810435bbc363845cf4664a
commit r14-10697-gabdea396e12e66185d810435bbc363845cf4664a
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression]
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The important part is the type alias ali1.
Even from the commit message:
```
it occurred to me that the problem is really
with alias (and concept) templates
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116789
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
struct s3 {
template constexpr s3(T x){}
};
template class s1;
template class s2;
template
using ali1 = s1;
template
void h() {
s2 A;
ali1 b;
}
```
The important part is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116793
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing this further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725231e16768bd9f16169b3b7e4cb5a98b251d1c
commit r15-3750-g725231e16768bd9f16169b3b7e4cb5a98b251d1c
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116777
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82309222300acf68e345b32155df21e1b876144e
commit r15-3746-g82309222300acf68e345b32155df21e1b876144e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
