https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116364
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c310d29cac1c3a770f48ab8bb2d295ef9cc08c53
commit r15-3030-gc310d29cac1c3a770f48ab8bb2d295ef9cc08c53
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116382
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b7904e274fbd6a736d63c0fed28ea32f9cb5997
commit r15-3031-g0b7904e274fbd6a736d63c0fed28ea32f9cb5997
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116403
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f115a8eeea41d383dfb1bbb1af6ac9a97aee180
commit r15-3032-g6f115a8eeea41d383dfb1bbb1af6ac9a97aee180
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116364
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115020
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1a53d9dcf9ebf0a6b4528a8c3eae48a583f272c
commit r15-3033-gc1a53d9dcf9ebf0a6b4528a8c3eae48a583f272c
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 116364, which changed state.
Bug 116364 Summary: [modules] GM explicit specialisation not propagated from
partition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116364
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116382
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 116382, which changed state.
Bug 116382 Summary: [modules] Importing NTTP of template type causes recursive
lazy load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116382
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 116403, which changed state.
Bug 116403 Summary: [modules] Deduction guides not reachable across transitive
non-exported imports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116403
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116403
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115020
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115020, which changed state.
Bug 115020 Summary: [modules] ICE in import_export_decl for GMF function
definition in partition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115020
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The issue is the recurrence
>
>[local count: 10737416]:
> x_10 = b[31999];
> y_11 = b[31998];
>
>[local count: 1063004408]:
> # x_18 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116426
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84246
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35f56012806432fd89bbae431950a8dc5f6729a3
commit r15-3035-g35f56012806432fd89bbae431950a8dc5f6729a3
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84246
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84246, which changed state.
Bug 84246 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] [Coarray] ICE in conv_caf_send, at
fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:1950
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84246
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116192
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
I noticed by accident that the fix has already been committed. Thanks for the
fix
As documented in https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs, the
ChangeLog snippet
in the commit message should co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116421
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
You can try to see whether adding a SSA copy would make this supported, it
seems not allowing a PHI is simply a missed feature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116427
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116427
Bug ID: 116427
Summary: [15 regression] 32-bit crab1 fails to link on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115683
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #0)
> >
> > > g++: g++.target/i386/pr100637-1b.C
> > > g++: g++.target/i386/pr1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116238
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115683
--- Comment #8 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> Richi, maybe tree optimizers can perform their optimizations with
> vec_cmp{,u} and vcond_mask, and at the end provide the true coditional
> vector move (that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116413
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116428
Bug ID: 116428
Summary: Redeclaration of explicitly defaulted comparison
operator makes it undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116355
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pheeck at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116429
Bug ID: 116429
Summary: [LRA] [M86k] Wrong spill offset
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra, wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116192
Arthur Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
Bug ID: 116430
Summary: Crash "Assert_Failure nlists.adb:674" while compiling
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
--- Comment #1 from Pascal Malaise ---
Compiles OK with GNAT-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116427
Pierre-Emmanuel Patry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre-emmanuel.patry@embec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116381
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116381
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually g:7b277e8b464b seems to have partially implemented it, but without
rejecting arrays.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116427
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Pierre-Emmanuel Patry dot com> ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>
>> I wonder what the way forward is here: just wait for gccrs to be
>> self-contai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116274
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8ea13ebf1211714503fd72f25c04376483bfa53
commit r15-3036-gb8ea13ebf1211714503fd72f25c04376483bfa53
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116236
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #24)
> Hopefully fixed, but please let me know if this code causes similar problems
> elsewhere.
I think there was a corresponding bug on the AVR side, not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115683
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #8)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> > Richi, maybe tree optimizers can perform their optimizations with
> > vec_cmp{,u} and vcond_mask, and at the e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86468
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Andre V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
--- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a patch on the mailing list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6ed6kntue@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
--- Comment #6 from Robin Dapp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116348
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
The proposed change triggers a test suite regression on x86_64:
WARNING: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test program timed out.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5348e3cb9bc99d2ee4d7438b8eca5c92fff5b931
commit r15-3038-g5348e3cb9bc99d2ee4d7438b8eca5c92fff5b931
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86468
--- Comment #12 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #11)
> Patch proposed: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-August/060882.html
> Waiting for review.
Hi Andre,
great to see you back in action for gcc/gfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #2 from Valentin Tolmer ---
Sorry, typo in the last sentence: "the templated function doesn't have to be
instantiated to trigger the bug".
See https://godbolt.org/z/3xosx5dn4 for a reproduction.
Adding an instantiation gives an add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #7 from Robin Dapp ---
Ah, hmm, this doesn't seem to occur on trunk anymore for me. It's still likely
latent. Patrick, does it still happen for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116372
--- Comment #8 from Manolis Tsamis ---
I have sent the fix for this, together with the testcase from this ticket, in
the lists. Link is
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660912.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116405
--- Comment #6 from Manolis Tsamis ---
I have sent the fix for this, together with the testcase from this ticket, in
the lists. Link is
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660912.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103660
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82a2f1386b2e8c951e910e1096a04bed21bbd39b
commit r15-3039-g82a2f1386b2e8c951e910e1096a04bed21bbd39b
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103660
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eface71c18caea3009ddc1ac624cb41647e9d5c4
commit r15-3041-geface71c18caea3009ddc1ac624cb41647e9d5c4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103660
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b73373520f0ed5d131d2cd6ee9078939a98d7a0d
commit r15-3040-gb73373520f0ed5d131d2cd6ee9078939a98d7a0d
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114802
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #35 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Ball
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25812d8b789748911e800a972e5a3a030e3ac905
commit r14-10605-g25812d8b789748911e800a972e5a3a030e3ac905
Author: Alexandre Oliv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116236
--- Comment #26 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> I think there was a corresponding bug on the AVR side, not sure if that's
> now also resolved.
As far as I understand, the AVR issue is of a different kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116238
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101232
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64028d626a50410dbf29f252a78c7675b35751d6
commit r15-3043-g64028d626a50410dbf29f252a78c7675b35751d6
Author: Franciszek Witt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113454
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to edison from comment #3)
> i can reproduct this error with cpu2006 483.xalancbmk and can not find any
> workaround with gcc 14.1.
For GCC 14 you need to modify the source file by removing the err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116372
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
FYI: bootstrap is restored with the patch. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116431
Bug ID: 116431
Summary: s390x: gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-1.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116238
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116431
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
$ gcc -c -fstack-protector-strong -fdiagnostics-plain-output --param
min-vect-loop-bound=1 --param max-unrolled-insns=200 --param max-unroll-times=8
--param max-completely-peeled-insns=200 --param max-comple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113685
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111690
--- Comment #1 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
This program should be rejected as well due to ambiguity of equality comparison
operator:
```
#include
struct A {
friend auto operator <=>(const A &, const A &) = default;
friend auto operator <=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill ---
I'm not able to replicate it either (and the fuzzer hasn't found a duplicate
that is still valid)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93988
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
--- Comment #5 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104937
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||55004
Summary|[12/13/14/15 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116429
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116432
Bug ID: 116432
Summary: Problem with warming Wtype-limits
Product: gcc
Version: 11.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116433
Bug ID: 116433
Summary: [AVR] cannot place template class static members in
EEPROM
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87178
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||digger1984 at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116434
Bug ID: 116434
Summary: Problem with warming Wsign-compare
Product: gcc
Version: 11.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116433
--- Comment #2 from C.F. ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You can't do that as the template variables are comdat.
>
> The real fix is to have named address spaces support extended to C++. See PR
> 43745.
>
> *** This bug has b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
More:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92834.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MAX_EXPR <" 8
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94786.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MAX_EXPR <" 4
These pass with -march=x86-64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This too works with -march=x86-64 but not -march=x86-64-v2.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-31.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " \\* 2" 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> More:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92834.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MAX_EXPR <" 8
This is .REDUC_MAX vs MAX_EXPR .
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94786.c sca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> This too works with -march=x86-64 but not -march=x86-64-v2.
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-31.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " \\* 2" 1
Simple fix -fno-tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
These too:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-double-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorized
loops: 1" 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xorsign.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 2 loops"
1
with -march=x86-64-v2 we'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116348
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
That test has been ping-ponging for me for a while. I suspect it's not related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> This C code seems to fail with -O1:
>
> int RB_Open_SingleDocumentation_document;
> char RB_Open_SingleDocumentation_document_0,
> RB_Open_SingleDocumen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106344
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
$ make check-c RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-march=x86-64-v3\} vect.exp"
shows more problematic tests:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-92.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned
access" 0
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107145
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
