https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91940
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Only 16-bit byteswap has the r>> 8 canonical form, larger byteswaps don't.
Larger byteswaps certainly aren't rotates, but just permutes. So, if the
vectorizer doesn't try that already, it should try to vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c67a0fa1dd39a3378deb854a7fef0ff7fe38004
commit r15-2810-g3c67a0fa1dd39a3378deb854a7fef0ff7fe38004
Author: Surya Kumari Jang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116281
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
In other contexts where the comma has a special meaning like function call
arguments the expression is accepted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116284
Bug ID: 116284
Summary: incorrect classification of zero-sized array as
variably modified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116258
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aa4cd913e48cfce3ca0ab58cf6f80f55dbb0f58
commit r15-2811-g5aa4cd913e48cfce3ca0ab58cf6f80f55dbb0f58
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116016
--- Comment #66 from Alejandro Colomar ---
(In reply to Kees Cook from comment #65)
> (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #64)
> > How about having two macros? One that works for non-attributed pointers,
> > and other that works for att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91940
--- Comment #12 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
But the condition I quoted rejects the recognition of a bswap16 with
non-promoted
arguments.
vectorizable_bswap doesn't do anything for processors that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #27)
> With gcc-15-2794-g5b97d1a most insn-*.cc files compile in minutes.
> The only exception is insn-recog.cc which takes 85 minutes (1 hour 25
> minutes).
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114855
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
The testcase is a bit unwieldly for developing a fix - I wonder if it's
possible to auto-generate smaller testcases with the same structure?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116191
--- Comment #5 from ilija.tovilo ---
That's true ofc, but if you look at the example:
__attribute__((cold)) extern void cold_func(void);
Simply removing the cold attribute will cause zend_string_release() to be
inlined, so it is indeed involve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116285
Bug ID: 116285
Summary: Compilation of nodejs/v8
8_base_without_compiler.runtime-temporal.cc is slow
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116285
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58866
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58866&action=edit
v8_base_without_compiler.runtime-temporal.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115744
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afa3a4a52cf91485477e4aaa5f05987ec7ff869d
commit r15-2815-gafa3a4a52cf91485477e4aaa5f05987ec7ff869d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115744
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115754
Bug 115754 depends on bug 115744, which changed state.
Bug 115744 Summary: [C++26] P2747R2 - constexpr placement new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115744
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 115744, which changed state.
Bug 115744 Summary: [C++26] P2747R2 - constexpr placement new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115744
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115744
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
Bug ID: 116286
Summary: Compilation of nodejs/v8
v8_turboshaft.csa-optimize-phase.cc is slow
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/gcc/116286/v8_turboshaft.csa-optimize-phase.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ea203f8e-8dd4-46f6-ada5-a2bf5ea8185e@app.
> fastmail.com/
.. and the original thread from Sebastian was
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116287
Bug ID: 116287
Summary: __builtin_ia32_bzhi_si() ignores side effects of its
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
--- Comment #4 from Roger Sayle ---
Created attachment 58868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58868&action=edit
proposed patch
Here's my proposed fix (the first of two patches) that resolves the ICE with
the testcase. The p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116275
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Thank you, I'll use that for now, but please don't apologise. I do the testing
because I enjoy it and to help. No harm done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116288
Bug ID: 116288
Summary: C++ overloading
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115464
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
Alpine hit this when building libaom w/ gcc-14.2
(https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/jobs/1473732#L471).
FWIW, I've not hit any other issues on trunk like this, so should be ready to
backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289
Bug ID: 116289
Summary: [13.3 regression] Can't apply decltype to comparison
operators created by spaceship operator for local
classes
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116054
Tommy Murphy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116287
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58870
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58870&action=edit
gcc15-pr116287.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
template instantiation : 8.85 ( 19%) 1.46 ( 28%) 10.50 ( 20%)
1147M ( 32%)
|overload resolution : 6.17 ( 13%) 0.74 ( 14%) 7.07 ( 13%)
525M ( 15%)
|name lookup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116286
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
The context is some nodejs bump imports a massive upgrade of v8 and compared to
clang, we take like 10 minutes longer to build (and gcc build time doubled
between versions). Unfortunately, it looks like it's a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116288
--- Comment #2 from Hans Buchmann ---
I use:
uname -a
Linux buchmann-h 6.10.3-arch1-2 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue, 06 Aug 2024
07:21:19 + x86_64 GNU/Linux
with
pacman -Ss aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
extra/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc 14.1.0-1 [install
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hans.buchmann.wantuch@gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71aebb36174c194231da5f9c7c23f81dbb082ca4
commit r15-2819-g71aebb36174c194231da5f9c7c23f81dbb082ca4
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115062, which changed state.
Bug 115062 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in simplify_aggr_init_exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062
What|Removed |Added
--
read model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental)
4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit
767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
@@ -37036,13 +37036,20 @@
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 118111604 (nil)))
-> 1416)
(note # 0 0 [bb 12] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
-(insn:TI # 0 0 12 (set (reg/v/f:DI 4 si [orig:140 label ] [140])
-(r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
char *camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part;
void g_once_init_enter();
void camel_message_info_class_intern_init() {
int ii;
char *label;
for (; camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part[i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looks like ivopts.
In message_info_load, ivopts dumps are the first ones to contain differences
like
[local count: 955630198]:
- # _172 = PHI <_32(59), 0(56)>
# _173 = PHI <_33(59), label_117(56)>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:190ad81282057b0e5884fd30a7270356b9b1
commit r15-2821-g190ad81282057b0e5884fd30a7270356b9b1
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Thu Aug 8 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
sl
--enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie --disable-host-bind-now
--enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3
bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental)
4d44f3fc387815e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
Bug ID: 116292
Summary: [15 regression] ICE on invalid reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
It's also accepted by <15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |simartin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid,|
|ice-on-invalid-code
27;
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental)
4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit
767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
--- Comment #29 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
> It might be interesting to have statistics on function sizes in
> insn-recog.cc to see if there's any outliers - if it's just very many
> there's nothing to do but split the file up.
Or LTO d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #146 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #145)
> There is no real error message coming from the compiler itself though. Maybe
> the patches don't fully work with gcc-14?
Same problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806
--- Comment #4 from Simon Martin ---
This started to fail with
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=557831a91df947b447fc9fd94ecad02470a3c86a
3
bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental)
4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit
767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I'm reducing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58874&action=edit
libduktaped.so.207.20700-duktape.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #9 from Jan André Reuter ---
Thanks a lot for the patch Prathamesh Kulkarni. There seems to be some
progress, which is great to see!
I've tried your patch. I applied it to the latest snapshot and also to GCC
14.2.0 and GCC 14.1.0 to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #10 from Jan André Reuter ---
Created attachment 58875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58875&action=edit
Verbose compile output after rebuilding the latest GCC snapshot with the patch
applied
New error message wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Code is a bit nonsensical in that it masks a shift by a crazy value (3629), but
the underlying bug is real. Ultimately we're going to rely on the fact that
hardware truncates the count (mask with 0x3f) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #11 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
Yes, those two errors are expected.
I posted RFC discussion about AArch64/nvptx offloading issues here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2024-July/244466.html
For the unrecognized co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase so that it also verifies what is destructed first, S vs. T in
the various cases and standards:
// P2718R0 - Wording for P2644R1 Fix for Range-based for Loop
// { dg-do run { target c++11 }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90839
Andrew Carlotti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acarlotti at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 58876
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58876&action=edit
A patch
Here is a patch. Hongtao, please take a look and add a testcase. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296
Bug ID: 116296
Summary: [15 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at
ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289
--- Comment #3 from Egor ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> r14-4140 ... doesn't seem suitable for backporting
Fair enough. What's the procedure now, should I set status=resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4d3dba253b49fb0e8e32109783f76453bc53653
commit r15-2838-gc4d3dba253b49fb0e8e32109783f76453bc53653
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295
Bug ID: 116295
Summary: [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from
address-space __flash
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ca1d7a36abecee7da387ceb1c07d77eaad15927
commit r14-10573-g9ca1d7a36abecee7da387ceb1c07d77eaad15927
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that patch and it seems to work just fine:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s176.c"
# of expected passes6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116229
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c24e0568392e51a77ebdaab629d631969ce8966
commit r15-2839-g2c24e0568392e51a77ebdaab629d631969ce8966
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116229
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
Bug ID: 116297
Summary: ICE on using default spaceship comparison operator
inside requires
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1
commit r15-2840-g7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189
Bug 114189 depends on bug 116041, which changed state.
Bug 116041 Summary: aarch64 fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58878
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58878&action=edit
gcc15-pr107637-wip.patch
Completely untested WIP patch, with which the above testcase now passes also in
-std=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298
Bug ID: 116298
Summary: No error when taking address of overloaded member
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed. Also happens with functions and not just member functions:
```
template
E f() ;// #1
template
E f() ;// #2
template
E f(int) ; // #3
auto x = &f;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08
Keyword
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
