https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114683
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115595
Bug ID: 115595
Summary: ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.cc:2546 with
attribute optimize and noipa
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115596
Bug ID: 115596
Summary: Default arguments are erroneously allowed for
parameters of a requires expression
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
Bug ID: 115597
Summary: [15 Regression] vectorizer takes 20+ h compiling
510.parest in SPECCPU2017 since
g:46bb4ce4d30ab749d40f6f4cef6f1fb7c7813452
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-23
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a1795bddcd34284936af4706f762d89c60fc69c
commit r15-1564-g8a1795bddcd34284936af4706f762d89c60fc69c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, I feared this would happen - this case seems to be because of a lot of
VEC_PERM nodes(?) which are not handled by the CSE process as well as the
two-operator nodes which lack SLP_TREE_SCALAR_STMTS (we'd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
>
> Can you check whether that fixes the issue?
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> index 9465d94de1a..212d5f97f7d 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-slp.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The immediate fix is:
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index c17141d909a..5e34dc92210 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -1702,7 +170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Ah, I feared this would happen - this case seems to be because of a lot of
> VEC_PERM nodes(?) which are not handled by the CSE process as well as the
> two-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115598
Bug ID: 115598
Summary: ICE: in build_call_a, at cp/call.cc:370
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115501
--- Comment #9 from Anonymous ---
*** Bug 115598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115598
Anonymous changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115599
Bug ID: 115599
Summary: ICE: qsort checking failed during GIMPLE pass: reassoc
(error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted
output: 150142972)
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a345214fc332b6f0821edf394ff8802b768db1d
commit r15-1565-g2a345214fc332b6f0821edf394ff8802b768db1d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-23
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115599
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82407
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115599
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58497
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58497&action=edit
foo.cxx.xz
Attaching original.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115409
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> 2008-08-23 Sebastian Redl
>
> Add (again) exception propagation support as per N2179. Feature is
> available only when _GLIBCXX_ATOMI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114139
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd536b8412d4dae42aa04739c06f99a915be6261
commit r15-1566-gfd536b8412d4dae42aa04739c06f99a915be6261
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sun Jun 23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114139
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
On 23 Jun 2024, at 11:47, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
>
> --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The immediate fix is:
>
> dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951
--- Comment #16 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Given that this issue was filed >20 years ago and both the passlist and
documentation have changed drastically since then, I think the
originally-reported bugs are probably irrelevant and it's fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109989
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
floatsisf is going to be called through the libcall interface which has
different paths than normal function calls and I don't think the usual type
promotion rules apply to libcalls.The details escape m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> This code gives me strict aliasing violation vibes:
> ```
> T **getAddressOfPointer(ExternalASTSource *Source) const {
> // Ensure the integer is in po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jessica Clarke from comment #8)
> The clang/ subdirectory should be building itself with -fno-strict-aliasing
> on GCC already
"Should". I guess you mean "is", as in "we already conclude
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115600
Bug ID: 115600
Summary: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer doesn't seem to like
modules
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99511
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115596
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 115596, which changed state.
Bug 115596 Summary: Default arguments are erroneously allowed for parameters of
a requires expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115596
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
--- Comment #16 from user202729 ---
Hi,
I tried to implement patches that fix the two issues mentioned. Comments would
be appreciated.
1. The operator new flag with many of the mentioned issues fixed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115600
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Di Bella ---
I forgot that `gcc -v` can provide config options.
```
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.1.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115601
Bug ID: 115601
Summary: ICE when compiling a function marked noipa/noinline
called in a contract predicate
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115601
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Created attachment 58499
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58499&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98735
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cjdb.ns at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115600, which changed state.
Bug 115600 Summary: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer doesn't seem to like modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115600
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115485
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can reproduce on the trunk too:
```
[apinski@xeond2 gcc]$ ./cc1plus CASEServer.ii -quiet -fPIE -msingle-pic-base
-mpic-register=r9 -fomit-frame-pointer -mno-pic-data-is-text-relative -mthumb
-mlong-calls -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88814
--- Comment #4 from Cristian Rodríguez ---
Any hope to revive this now that memccpy is on the C23 standard?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The backports have not been done yet.
It would be good if the blockage / barrier would get some comment btw, saying
what exactly it is intended to do! It is very much cargo-cult the way it is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96853
NIKEA-SOFT changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsoft.sagaonline at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
Hello!
I believe that now is a fantastic moment to publish an article on how to
boost confidence so that individuals can accomplish their goals and live
their best lives.
Does this strike you as a suitable topic for your website? If that’s the
case, I can get started on the article right away.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108917
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
I think the problem here is related to the setting of DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN on
the contract checking functions.
"
DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN, if non-NULL, points to the original (abstract)
..._DECL node of wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 58500
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58500&action=edit
Hack to fix failure of poll.cc on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
The number of iterations is specific to my curren
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
Bug ID: 115602
Summary: [15 Regression] ICE on liblapack-3.12.0: in
vect_schedule_slp_node, at tree-vect-slp.cc:9643
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 58501
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58501&action=edit
ztpmv.f.f
Also attaching unreduced 'ztpmv.f.f' in case cvise mangled it too much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102061
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
bisect landed at r15-1565-g2a345214fc332b
commit 2a345214fc332b6f0821edf394ff8802b768db1d (HEAD)
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Sun Jun 23 11:26:39 2024 +0200
tree-optimization/115597 - allow CSE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115485
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely r7-1945-gb88bd5e0ca1208 introduced/exposed the ICE. It changes the
behavior of -mno-pic-data-is-text-relative but adding -msingle-pic-base didn't
ICE in GCC 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b5e8f918ef0027d2af8e53c4e114e1d133fc609
commit r14-10342-g2b5e8f918ef0027d2af8e53c4e114e1d133fc609
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd54ed4ae417935300a3c4bb356d37c2ae7f731e
commit r13-8866-gdd54ed4ae417935300a3c4bb356d37c2ae7f731e
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fd6ae9b20913ab84d596448e14411eedbd324f9
commit r12-10579-g0fd6ae9b20913ab84d596448e14411eedbd324f9
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:549701628b64a7c4ac9bb5f9623e83a8dc1d828c
commit r11-11535-g549701628b64a7c4ac9bb5f9623e83a8dc1d828c
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115603
Bug ID: 115603
Summary: [concepts] differing declaration and definition do not
give error
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115406
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
>
> BTW, when assign -1 to vector(1) , should the upper bit be
> cleared? Look like only 1 element boolean vector is cleared, but not
> vector(2) .
> If the upper bits are not cleared, both 2 cases are equal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #17 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> Have we done the backports so we can just mark this bug a FIXED? ...or do
> we still need to push the backports?
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
th,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib64,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib32
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20240623 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115604
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113325
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6274f10318d05311f31147c895f76a01aec37830
commit r15-1576-g6274f10318d05311f31147c895f76a01aec37830
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115605
Bug ID: 115605
Summary: structured binding break if a variable named
tuple_size is visibile at the decomposition site
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115605
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I think I see how it should be fixed.
The way std::initializer_list is handled is correct:
static tree
listify (tree arg)
{
tree std_init_list = lookup_qualified_name (std_node, init_list_identifier);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
Bug ID: 115606
Summary: return slot opt prevents tail calls
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109618
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note CALL_EXPR_RETURN_SLOT_OPT is set in the C++ front-end:
else if (style == arg)
{
/* Just mark it addressable here, and leave the rest to
expand_call{,_inline}. */
cxx_mark_add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115344
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115344
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #2)
> x86 doesn't have hardware do loops, it's only for some obscure targets like
> some DSPs.
Actually doloop was added to support rs6000(powerpc)'s loop counter regist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-*-* |
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
If C example is easier to debug graphviz-10.0.1 exhibits the same ICE.
Minimized example:
// $ cat gvevent.c.c
typedef struct {
double x, y;
} pointf;
struct {
pointf focus;
double zoom;
pointf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115602
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 58502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58502&action=edit
gvevent.c.c
Attaching unreduced gvevent.c.c in case cvise mangled it too much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115607
Bug ID: 115607
Summary: missed tail call with large structure size
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608
Bug ID: 115608
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 when building
with -mv8plus
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -fPIE is needed to get the ICE in this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-linux-gnu |sparc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #2 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115528
--- Comment #28 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Richard, unfortunately the fix (it seems it was committed to gcc git master on
last Friday) did not fix our problem yet. The original test case still
segfaults:
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x7f36f52a3a6c
94 matches
Mail list logo
