https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- On 23 Jun 2024, at 11:47, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591 > > --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The immediate fix is: > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > index c17141d909a..5e34dc92210 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > @@ -1702,7 +1702,9 @@ riscv_valid_lo_sum_p (enum riscv_symbol_type sym_type, > machine_mode mode, > align = (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x) > ? DECL_ALIGN (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)) > : 1); > - size = (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x) && DECL_SIZE (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)) > + size = (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x) > + && DECL_SIZE (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x)) > + && tree_fits_uhwi_p (DECL_SIZE (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x))) > ? tree_to_uhwi (DECL_SIZE (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (x))) > : 2*BITS_PER_WORD); > } > > but I cannot really test it. Can I help with testing? (beyond applying the patch and checking that the error is fixed)
