[Bug fortran/111674] [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable subobject of a non-finalizable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84284e1c490e9235fca5cb85269ecfcb87eef4f1 commit r14-4390-g84284e1c490e9235fca5cb85269ecfcb87eef4f1 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed O

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84284e1c490e9235fca5cb85269ecfcb87eef4f1 commit r14-4390-g84284e1c490e9235fca5cb85269ecfcb87eef4f1 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed O

[Bug c/111684] enhancement: gcc doesn't warn about pointless tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111684 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2) > I've had a quick look at the linux-6.6-rc4 kernel code > and found about a dozen examples of this problem, so there > would be some customers for a solutio

[Bug tree-optimization/111668] [12/13/14 Regression] vrp2 (match and simplify) introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ab01269396203d5200fff8579768da54dcfde5d commit r14-4391-g7ab01269396203d5200fff8579768da54dcfde5d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/111690] New: Redefinition of operator == not detected with friend <=>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111690 Bug ID: 111690 Summary: Redefinition of operator == not detected with friend <=> Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid

[Bug middle-end/111369] [14 Regression] ICE in handle_cast, gimple-lower-bitint.cc:1486 with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111369 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64eeec25f11e31bed844ef0a95ef0f9661c3ab37 commit r14-4392-g64eeec25f11e31bed844ef0a95ef0f9661c3ab37 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug tree-optimization/111668] [12/13 Regression] vrp2 (match and simplify) introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] vrp2 |[12/13 Regression] vrp2

[Bug middle-end/111369] [14 Regression] ICE in handle_cast, gimple-lower-bitint.cc:1486 with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111369 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #16 from Robin Dapp --- Confirming that it's the compilation of insn-emit.cc which takes > 10 minutes. The rest (including auto generating of files) is reasonably fast. Going to do some experiments with it and see which pass takes

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #37 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19 commit r13-7934-g29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19 Author: Paul Thomas Date

[Bug fortran/111674] [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable subobject of a non-finalizable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19 commit r13-7934-g29cd67f93f00cc7a9b08eae4f3e12e67ed568f19 Author: Paul Thomas Date

[Bug fortran/111674] [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable subobject of a non-finalizable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 111674, which changed state. Bug 111674 Summary: [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable subobject of a non-finalizable type https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674 What|Removed

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 > > --- Comment #16 from Robin Dapp --- > Confirming that it's the compilation of insn

[Bug libstdc++/106201] filesystem::directory_iterator is a borrowable range?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106201 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/111643] __attribute__((flatten)) with -O1 runs out of memory (killed cc1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111648] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-3243-ga7dba4a1c05

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/111652] [14 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |14.0 Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/111653] make bootstrap4 fails for -fchecking=2 code generation changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111653 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IMHO we should try harder to make -fchecking=2 _not_ generate different code.

[Bug c/111691] New: [OpenMP][5.2] C/C++ handle 'omp declare variant([base–name:]variant-name)' - i.e. with 'base-name'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111691 Bug ID: 111691 Summary: [OpenMP][5.2] C/C++ handle 'omp declare variant([base–name:]variant-name)' - i.e. with 'base-name' Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug middle-end/111655] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code generated for __builtin_signbit and 0./0. on x86-64 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/111660] [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/111664] [14 regression] Fails to build with mawk (error in gcc/opt-read.awk) after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug fortran/111666] [OpenMP] Fortran FE creates too many temporaries for clauses / 'omp target'+'omp team' #teams/#threads optimize_target_teams optimization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111666 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Why not delay this "evaluate now" to gimplification time?

[Bug tree-optimization/111668] [12/13 Regression] vrp2 (match and simplify) introduces invalid wide signed Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0 Target Milestone|14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/111671] [14 Regression] ICE in get_default_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.cc:312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- The standard only defines sorting in terms of comparisons on "every iterator i pointing to the sequence", which seems to preclude using a temporary object on the stack that is outside the sequence. That s

[Bug middle-end/111683] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Incorrect answer when using SSE2 intrinsics with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.2.1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Bie

[Bug other/111686] [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, testsuite-fail Target Mi

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The sketches above are completely untested (and incorrect) but just demonstrating the ideas.

[Bug libstdc++/99327] ENOTSUP macro does not exist on djgpp crt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ae7641a3e34dfb79f8538965b48e411d825b90f commit r11-11034-g6ae7641a3e34dfb79f8538965b48e411d825b90f Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e6ce4031ce6eba3ea8b2b75bcacb869b591b92c commit r11-11037-g5e6ce4031ce6eba3ea8b2b75bcacb869b591b92c Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e20b1c711f70d8d251d45694c50c02e66a4d9f7b commit r11-11036-ge20b1c711f70d8d251d45694c50c02e66a4d9f7b Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e742c6baa92403767b4ba8227f34fc7919db28e0 commit r11-11039-ge742c6baa92403767b4ba8227f34fc7919db28e0 Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/108178] Filesystem::copy_file can't copy from /proc on Linux machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108178 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d69407149194e2a7ee20537c76acb1976c8659be commit r11-11048-gd69407149194e2a7ee20537c76acb1976c8659be Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/97731] terminate called in std::experimental::filesystem::recursive_directory_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97731 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eed5712110b63a0021358cbf195d32c5b372638 commit r11-11049-g9eed5712110b63a0021358cbf195d32c5b372638 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/99327] ENOTSUP macro does not exist on djgpp crt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|11.5 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/108178] Filesystem::copy_file can't copy from /proc on Linux machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108178 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/111616] On Zen2 7% 519.lbm_r regression between g:1d17d58c284fa8c3 (2023-09-14 02:39) and g:c8e9a75085f9725c (2023-09-18 13:09)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111616 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 111616, which changed state. Bug 111616 Summary: On Zen2 7% 519.lbm_r regression between g:1d17d58c284fa8c3 (2023-09-14 02:39) and g:c8e9a75085f9725c (2023-09-18 13:09) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111616

[Bug middle-end/111655] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code generated for __builtin_signbit and 0./0. on x86-64 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > And this conservatively has to apply to all FP divisions where we might infer > "nonnegative" unless we can also infer !zerop? Yes, I think the logic in

[Bug other/111692] New: ICE in output_constant at varasm:cc:5267 during RTL "final" pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111692 Bug ID: 111692 Summary: ICE in output_constant at varasm:cc:5267 during RTL "final" pass Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 Mathieu Malaterre changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56015|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #17 from Mathieu Malaterre --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15) > That returns a address to a local variable ... Sorry I am having a hard time driving cvise correctly. Here is the latest version: g++-13 -g -o works inf

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #18 from Robin Dapp --- Just finished an initial timing run, sorted, first 10: Time variable usr sys wall GGC phase opt and generate : 567.60 ( 97%) 38.23

[Bug target/111692] ICE in output_constant at varasm:cc:5267 during RTL "final" pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111692 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|other

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- Compiling insn-emit.ii on a x86_64 host with a 13.2 release compiler shows most time is spent in inlining and CFG cleanup (the latter possibly in functions with a very large number of conditionals). For C

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #20 from Robin Dapp --- Mhm, why is your profile so different from mine? I'm also on an x86_64 host with a 13.2.1 host compiler (Fedora). Is it because of the preprocessed source? Or am I just reading the timing report wrong?

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor --- I was not able to reproduce this error on gcc112 on compile farm (powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu).

[Bug c++/111682] valgrind error in tsubst_template_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug bootstrap/111664] [14 regression] Fails to build with mawk (error in gcc/opt-read.awk) after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:027a94cf32be0b53d163e252e3c9e4800ad8f5f4 commit r14-4395-g027a94cf32be0b53d163e252e3c9e4800ad8f5f4 Author: Kito Cheng Date: Mon Oct

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- I made a mistake checking out the correct commit, so please disregard comment #1, I'm trying again.

[Bug ipa/111672] Inappropriate function splitting during pass_split_functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672 --- Comment #7 from Hanke Zhang --- Created attachment 56046 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56046&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug ipa/111672] Inappropriate function splitting during pass_split_functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672 --- Comment #8 from Hanke Zhang --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Add -save-temps and attach the resulting .i (or .ii) file. Thank you. I have attached it.

[Bug fortran/111661] [OpenACC] Detach+Attach of DT component gives libgomp: [0x405140,96] is not mapped when running 'acc update' on DT var itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111661 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Bégou --- With tab an instantiation of an r2tab type described above by Tobias Burnus this is what I am doing to enlarge the allocatable tab%val attribute to [n,m] elements with gcc13.2. !$acc exit data delete(

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- If you need me to try something let me know.

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- I have a release checking GCC 13.2 based host compiler, profile ordered similar to yours is the following where 'integration' is inlining callgraph ipa passes : 22.94 ( 12%) 2.24 ( 12%)

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #18 from psykose --- > Could you please run a regression to identify which commit along GCC-13 > branch introduce the change at least to get the ball rolling ? note that it might not actually be a regression; it's possible the cv

[Bug other/111686] [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's been failing for a while for me, and I don't think it can possibly be related to that commit.

[Bug tree-optimization/109353] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109353 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/111686] [13 regression] excess errors in 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc after r13-7931-ge6d26b141bf03a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111686 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/111690] Redefinition of operator == not detected with friend <=>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111690 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/111664] [14 regression] Fails to build with mawk (error in gcc/opt-read.awk) after r14-4354-ge4a4b8e983bac8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600 --- Comment #22 from Robin Dapp --- Ah, then it's not that different, your machine is just faster ;) callgraph ipa passes : 69.77 ( 11%) 5.97 ( 13%) 76.05 ( 12%) 2409M ( 10%) integration: 91.95 ( 15

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/111669] bogus -Wnonnull in conditionally executed code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111669 --- Comment #3 from Zeb Figura --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) > > The warning given for the reduced test case is correct because it does not > > make sense. It should be just rewritten as >

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, adding -fwrapv allows the testcase to pass ...

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski --- With -fwrapv: _87 = _92 * 2; NativeSet___trans_tmp_3 = { -2 }; _84 = _87 == -2; Without: _84 = _92 == -1; I think that is correct ...

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski --- That is the code in IsInf causes the difference ...

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/110701] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O1/2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:263369b2f7f726a3d4b269678d2c13a9d06a041e commit r14-4398-g263369b2f7f726a3d4b269678d2c13a9d06a041e Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed O

[Bug target/110643] [13/14 Regression] aarch64: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110643 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski --- Note even though the optimization was in GCC 11+ (r11-2550-gca2b8c082c4f added it), only GCC 13+ hits it in this case as GCC 13 lowers the vector comparison and uses the scalar for the one element signed 64

[Bug middle-end/111683] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Incorrect answer when using SSE2 intrinsics with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c/111693] New: Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Bug ID: 111693 Summary: Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug web/111694] New: Wrong behavior for signbit of negative zero when optimizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694 Bug ID: 111694 Summary: Wrong behavior for signbit of negative zero when optimizing Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/111688] [14 regression] bootstrap failure after r14-4383-g14d0c509898b03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111688 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Yeah, that seems to be it. If I cannot fix this tomorrow I'll revert the patch from master.

[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 --- Comment #10 from Fedor Chelnokov --- It seems that both libc++ and MS STL implement std::sort without a temporary object passed to cmp, because they are fine with compiling the following code in constant expression (where unrelated pointers

[Bug c/111695] New: Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695 Bug ID: 111695 Summary: Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/111695] Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695 Jonathan Leffler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.leffler at gmail dot com -

[Bug c/111695] Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Leffler --- Created attachment 56049 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56049&action=edit gcc-bug-3.c — Variation 3 (one array: does not generate -Wuse-after-free warnings)

[Bug c/111695] Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Leffler --- Created attachment 56050 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56050&action=edit gcc-bug-4.c — Variation 4 (one array — does not generate -Wuse-after-free warnings)

[Bug c/111695] Spurious -Wuse-after-free when managing two arrays in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111695 Jonathan Leffler changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56047|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/111696] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111696 Bug ID: 111696 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/111694] [13/14 Regression] Wrong behavior for signbit of negative zero when optimizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111694] [13/14 Regression] Wrong behavior for signbit of negative zero when optimizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111697] New: Sub optimal code gen for initialising vector using loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111697 Bug ID: 111697 Summary: Sub optimal code gen for initialising vector using loop Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/111697] Sub optimal code gen for initialising vector using loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111697 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Documented here: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The easiest way to find documentation for an option is to look at the index located at: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Option-Index.html And search for the option.

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Leffler --- The link https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free is to the "Options Controlling C++ Dialect". I was using the C compiler, not the C++ compiler

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Leffler --- The link https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wuse-after-free is to the "Options Controlling C++ Dialect". I was using the C compiler, not the C++ compiler

[Bug c/111693] Online manual mentions -Wuse-after-free but does not document it further

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Jonathan Leffler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVAL

[Bug c/111693] -Wuse-after-free is documented in the wrong location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-04 Summary|Online ma

[Bug c/111693] -Wuse-after-free is documented in the wrong location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > The easiest way to find documentation for an option is to look at the index > located at: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Option-Index.html >

[Bug c/111693] -Wuse-after-free is documented in the wrong location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/111698] New: Narrow memory access of compare to byte width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111698 Bug ID: 111698 Summary: Narrow memory access of compare to byte width Product: gcc Version: 12.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/98138] BB vect fail to SLP one case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138 --- Comment #12 from Jiangning Liu --- Hi Richi, > That said, "failure" to identify the common (vector) load is known > and I do have experimental patches trying to address that but did > not yet arrive at a conclusive "best" approach. It was

  1   2   >