https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111643
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2023-10-04
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Something like
#pragma GCC inline
foo ();
or
[[gnu::inline]] foo ();
was mentioned a few times but nobody bothered to implement it (setting a flag
on the CALL_EXPR).
Will post/push
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index b4770f1a149..645c76f23e9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -3109,7 +3109,9 @@ file descriptor opened with @code{O_RDONLY}.
@cindex @code{flatten} function attribute
@item flatten
Generally, inlining into a function is limited. For a function marked with
-this attribute, every call inside this function is inlined, if possible.
+this attribute, every call inside this function is inlined including the
+calls such inlining introduces to the function (but not recursive calls
+to the function itself), if possible.
Functions declared with attribute @code{noinline} and similar are not
inlined. Whether the function itself is considered for inlining depends
on its size and the current inlining parameters.
