https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Bernie Innocenti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.3.0 |13.1.1
Target Milestone|11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceae1400cf24f329393e96dd9720b0391afe858d
commit r14-2667-gceae1400cf24f329393e96dd9720b0391afe858d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88873
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:097106972f243ddcbddbbddd9a6bcc076f58b453
commit r14-2668-g097106972f243ddcbddbbddd9a6bcc076f58b453
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110750
Bug ID: 110750
Summary: [og13] nvptx offloading FAILs
'libgomp.c-c++-common/target-implicit-map-4.c'
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: og13 (devel/omp/gcc-13)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103173
Georg Müller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||georgmueller at gmx dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 55587
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55587&action=edit
trial-patch
This patch can fix the exposed failures on
gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-{1,8}.c, fully testin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, shouldn't this also apply to the main loop? I suppose we just never get
such a case, but maybe with peeling for gaps we would? Eventually we'd hope
we never would cost it as profitable.
In any case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
Bug ID: 110751
Summary: RISC-V: Suport undefined value that allows VSETVL PASS
use TA/MA
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #2 from Aleksei ---
Created attachment 55589
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55589&action=edit
GDB SHOW IT
But GDB show it normally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Thanks Xu take care of this issue.
Since it may need vectorizer support, better listen to both Richards's
suggestions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110612
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
A couple more clang warnings related to the text-art directory:
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/unique_ptr.h:99:2:
warning: delete called on non-final 'ana::stri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so TA is either merge or all-ones. Not sure how you can use MA at the
moment since you specify an existing operand in your target hook. As far as
I can see there's no value the target hook can provide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
> OK, so TA is either merge or all-ones.
Yes, your understand is correct, just few more detail is that can be mixing
with either merge or all-ones.
e.g.
An 4 x i32 vector with mask 1 0 1 0
Op = | a | b |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your program is using the default precision for printing a double: 6
significant figures.
101.922499943 with 6 digits of precision is 101.922 (because (24 rounds
to 2).
101.922499943 with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55587|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63199
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91951
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|goto + mixed declarations + |missed (optimization-level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #4 from Aleksei ---
ок
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #5 from Aleksei ---
this variant more clear.. 4 symbol after point// may by c++ has modification
for set symbols after decimal point ?
```
void func_float_point(std::ostream& os, const double& value, const
mcx::convert_info_t& cv)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103784
--- Comment #15 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
This is another test which has unnecessary zero extension:
#include
bool glob1;
bool glob2;
bool foo (int a, bool d)
{
bool c;
if (a > 2)
c = glob1 & glob2;
else
c = glob1 | glob2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64441
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67362
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luto at kernel dot org
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, kito at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> --- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
> > OK, so TA is either merge or all-ones.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61720
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63775
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63920
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kai.un...@l-3com.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58376
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64140
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64239
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, kito at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64584
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64585
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64649
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66359
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 102003, which changed state.
Bug 102003 Summary: [PDT] Length of character component not simplified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A release candidate arrived:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-July/242116.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A release candidate arrived:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-July/242116.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, kito at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you use std::fixed as the floatfield format then std::setprecision specifies
the number of digits after the decimal point:
os << (0.0 > value ? '-' : '0') << std::setw(cv.size - 1) << std::setfill('0')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> You don't need to handle the -'- sign yourself:
Oops, I mean '-' sign.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> --- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #9 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
> >
> > --- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> --- Comment #9 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0de3bf9175877d6c51c94fe04662c6e031876e1
commit r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175877d6c51c94fe04662c6e031876e1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #11 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
> >
> > --- Comment #9 from JuzheZhong --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> --- Comment #11 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
>
> rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110752
Bug ID: 110752
Summary: decltype in lambda loses const qualifier unless lambda
is mutable
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110114
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cb0dc866e8f95151df5d759157708108e850dd9
commit r14-2677-g2cb0dc866e8f95151df5d759157708108e850dd9
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
PR middle-end/101955
gcc/ChangeLog:
* match.pd (x << c) >> c -> -(x & 1): New simplification.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr101955.c: New test.
---
gcc/match.pd| 9 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101955.c | 62 +
My mailer clipped off the top of the commit message:
Simplifies (x << c) >> c where x is a signed integral type of
width >= int and c = precision(type) - 1 into -(x & 1). Tested successfully
on x86_64 and x86 targets.
PR middle-end/101955
gcc/ChangeLog:
* match.pd (x << c) >> c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110114
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE on |[13 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 55591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55591&action=edit
potental patch
I've attached Aldy's patch for PR109695 which he had backported to GCC13 back
in May.
This doe
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 7:47 AM Drew Ross via Gcc-bugs
wrote:
>
> PR middle-end/101955
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * match.pd (x << c) >> c -> -(x & 1): New simplification.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/pr101955.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/match.pd|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55572|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110114
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
The GCC 13 branch is frozen so I'll put this aside for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
aarch64 has the following function to check for +0.0:
```
/* Return TRUE if rtx X is immediate constant 0.0 (but not in Decimal
Floating Point). */
bool
aarch64_float_const_zero_rtx_p (rtx x)
{
/* 0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110753
Bug ID: 110753
Summary: ICE in meet_with_1, at ipa-cp.cc:1057
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110364
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:506f068e7d01ad2fb107185b8fb204a0ec23785c
commit r14-2681-g506f068e7d01ad2fb107185b8fb204a0ec23785c
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in meet_with_1, at |[14 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #12 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
I confirmed that this fixed the failures I was seeing. Thanks again!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110197
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Looks like this issue isn't specific to constexpr array construction:
struct Currency {
constexpr Currency(int) { }
};
constexpr int f() { return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated(); };
struct A {
Currenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44949
Graeme Smecher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gsmecher at threespeedlogic
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #7 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to palmer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> > I'd bet it's const_0_operand not allowing CONST_DOUBLE.
> >
> > The question is what unintended side effect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #8 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> I'd bet it's const_0_operand not allowing CONST_DOUBLE.
Correct.
> The question is what unintended side effects we'd have if we allowed
> CONST_DOUBLE 0.0 in c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #9 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> > I'd bet it's const_0_operand not allowing CONST_DOUBLE.
>
> Correct.
>
> > The question is what unintended side
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:17 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 7:47 AM Drew Ross via Gcc-bugs
> wrote:
> >
> > PR middle-end/101955
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * match.pd (x << c) >> c -> -(x & 1): New simplification.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106103
Ivan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Known to fail|11.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110717
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b50a851eef4b70aabf28fa875d9b2a302d17b66a
commit r14-2684-gb50a851eef4b70aabf28fa875d9b2a302d17b66a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5279d2db0c4ace4f8d311d9c875d51a0fe7b40ea
commit r12-9782-g5279d2db0c4ace4f8d311d9c875d51a0fe7b40ea
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5279d2db0c4ace4f8d311d9c875d51a0fe7b40ea
commit r12-9782-g5279d2db0c4ace4f8d311d9c875d51a0fe7b40ea
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110717
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ubizjak at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bd1373f87d581b1e5482f9c558d481c38027a99
commit r11-10918-g7bd1373f87d581b1e5482f9c558d481c38027a99
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bd1373f87d581b1e5482f9c558d481c38027a99
commit r11-10918-g7bd1373f87d581b1e5482f9c558d481c38027a99
Author: Harald Anlauf
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
