https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109666
--- Comment #5 from Carlos Galvez ---
This commit fixes all the ICEs on our side, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not sure about the from case, but what do I know about C++?
While To type is directly returned from a function, std::declval doesn't return
>From but
>From &&.
#include
using F1 = int (int);
using T1 = int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109678
--- Comment #2 from Gery Emreis ---
Its not just about compilation time but also about RAM usage. Compilation of
variation of std::variant as in provided example consumes unholy amounts of RAM
which in the end makes some files uncompilable on my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109693
Bug ID: 109693
Summary: trivial: unused private field
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109694
Bug ID: 109694
Summary: trivial: libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/ios_init.cc:203: alias
between functions of incompatible types
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
LC SSA is broken by unloop_loops (). That introduces BB 19 which is
[count: 0]:
f.8_13 = (unsigned char) f_19;
_14 = f.8_13 + 1;
f_38 = (char) _14;
_16 = a_lsm.17_51 + 1;
__builtin_unreachable ();
but t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue is rev. r14-322-g821ef93976e750.
We enter with vector(2) short using SImode and a PLUS_EXPR. Then
bool using_emulated_vectors_p = vect_emulated_vector_p (vectype);
yields true, but w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] many ICEs |[14 regression] many ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|14.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109694
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87de39e4c3686535728f3a347f772e73af4cf262
commit r14-389-g87de39e4c3686535728f3a347f772e73af4cf262
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109667
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109667
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, either SRA should be tweaked so that it can deal with DSE trimming of
initializations (I think that is the best way forward, after all, user could
have
done it manually too -
struct i256 {
long v[4];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f385252b2336a4a57a30fddf82e558c73bcc85cc
commit r14-391-gf385252b2336a4a57a30fddf82e558c73bcc85cc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
y's gcc:
$ ~/gcc/results.20230502.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w bug914.cc
gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program
cc1plus
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 54967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54967&action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
After an hour's reduction.
does this:
$ ~/gcc/results.20230502.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w -O2 bug915.c
during IPA pass: inline
bug915.c:7:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have
‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1060
7 | wait_for_reply_avg() { sprint_tm(wait_for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109661
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is it worth to test my patch or are you working on something more complete (say
-Wpsabi warnings for cases where the ABI changes between 12.x, ICE in 13.1,
fixed with different ABI for 13.2/14+?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109696
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|ice: tree check f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109661
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I'm working on a patch (though not literally right now).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cfc7f22eb4587029624050006c2ab4e82e9a0b1
commit r11-10672-g1cfc7f22eb4587029624050006c2ab4e82e9a0b1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108625
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0a1905b26751acea523a3bf1bca68d4ddc55c09
commit r11-10675-ga0a1905b26751acea523a3bf1bca68d4ddc55c09
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:893b9d8d7df3f6134aa4dd5f501db652448df41f
commit r11-10674-g893b9d8d7df3f6134aa4dd5f501db652448df41f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107451
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e74518e28d98994c2059063f339533d344db85e0
commit r11-10673-ge74518e28d98994c2059063f339533d344db85e0
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109585
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e54ecbcbe625847f384b11c41562038477a3eb2c
commit r11-10678-ge54ecbcbe625847f384b11c41562038477a3eb2c
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109473
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54ddf6426e04e4b0d24bbc7e37d40acbf5fbfe3b
commit r11-10676-g54ddf6426e04e4b0d24bbc7e37d40acbf5fbfe3b
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109502
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fc59677f7a9a2bff75e0002fef303a41a9ebe9d
commit r11-10677-g7fc59677f7a9a2bff75e0002fef303a41a9ebe9d
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109697
Bug ID: 109697
Summary: arm: lack of MVE instruction costing causing worse
codegen on a vec_duplicate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|14.0
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109675
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-02
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.5|11.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109573
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ee420c763add757bfb7c451f3ec986046644021
commit r11-10679-g8ee420c763add757bfb7c451f3ec986046644021
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109263
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4baf9f030f3b61499f3e83a3f5fc39bc8427cb5
commit r11-10680-gd4baf9f030f3b61499f3e83a3f5fc39bc8427cb5
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109506
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a9840cedbdc8be8252fd8f2d31d8fbd36632a2e
commit r14-393-g9a9840cedbdc8be8252fd8f2d31d8fbd36632a2e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109698
Bug ID: 109698
Summary: gcc/g++ build/link fails for libhwasan.so
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109698
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems binutils has added support for __ehdr_start only in
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2012-06/msg00171.html in 2012. Do
you have binutils older than that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
--- Comment #24 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 54968
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54968&action=edit
WIP patch – still many testcase fails
Patch to fixes some MODULE and PROGRAM issues with automatic save.
TODO:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108821
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd0192968999661d103bb9d974a8ad3be4ef3d9b
commit r11-10681-gbd0192968999661d103bb9d974a8ad3be4ef3d9b
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-02
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109648
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109685
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Neumann ---
Created attachment 54969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54969&action=edit
fix for the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109685
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Neumann ---
I can reproduce the issue. The attached patch fixes the problem, I will send it
for reviewing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] ICE at -O1 |[14 Regression] ICE at -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109692
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on concept as default |[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109679
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-02
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109698
--- Comment #3 from David Richards ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What version of ld is this?
>
> It might be bug there:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24458
ld --version:
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109698
--- Comment #4 from David Richards ---
ld --version:
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public Licen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109632
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
After prototyping this further, I no longer think that lowering
at the gimple level is the best answer. (I should have listened
to Richi.) Although it works, its major drawback is that
it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
have a look at the changes in waccess... this compiles fine with
--disable-tree-waccess1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109699
Bug ID: 109699
Summary: With OpenACC reallocating a fortran pointer on a user
type with allocatable fails.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109617
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1adb1a653d6739589b12337c974c7e741cfb187c
commit r14-395-g1adb1a653d6739589b12337c974c7e741cfb187c
Author: Yanzhang Wang
Date: Wed A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109617
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
Bug ID: 109700
Summary: [13/14 regression] ICE with address sanitizer after
declaring __builtin_alloca
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is replacing __builtin_alloca with __builtin_alloca_with_align .
__builtin_alloca is NOT known not to throw with the definition provided and
that is the cause of the issue.
Adding [[gnu::nothrow]] fixes t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109650
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I forgot to add. Running with "ulimit -s unlimited" does not segfault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #5)
> There are multiple issues.
>
> 1. The out-of-line definition and the inline definition of
> std::type_info::before do different things. Specifically, only one n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109701
Bug ID: 109701
Summary: I have a MWE where an omp reduction breaks if I add
the option for GPU offloading (even if it isn't used).
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109701
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Meltzer ---
Could be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 but I am
not sure. In my case the GPU offloading should be ignored.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109128
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
RFC with patch to extend the linker plugin API:
linker side: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-May/127271.html
GCC side: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/617277.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109702
Bug ID: 109702
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code with if and __builtin_bswap
and others
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 12.2.0, 8.1.0
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely started with r8-1884-ge3174bdf35c172f (just like PR 104449 ). PR
104449 was supposed to fix part of this but it seems like it didn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109701
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #2 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109703
Bug ID: 109703
Summary: __builtin_unreachable() reached
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
--- Comment #6 from James Legg ---
Yes, declaring bulitin functions is bad, but I didn't expect the ICE.
It wasn't done intentionally. glibc's alloca.h defines a alloca(s) macro as
__builtin_alloca(s). I had some code defining _alloca as alloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.1.0
Status|AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, I think I see what's going on here. Once again, the problem is that this
assert no longer passes:
#include
static_assert (!std::is_convertible_v , "");
std::is_convertible does
To test() { return std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109701
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Meltzer from comment #1)
> Could be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 but I
> am not sure. In my case the GPU offloading should be ignored.
Replaci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109640
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
commit r13-7276-g6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
commit r13-7276-g6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109671
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
commit r13-7276-g6b927b1297e66e26e62e722bf15c921dcbbd25b9
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89835
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a2383f47ae70c31f91775142b9fb03f697741c2
commit r14-403-g6a2383f47ae70c31f91775142b9fb03f697741c2
Author: Patrick O'Neill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__builtin_unreachable() |[13/14 Regression]
|r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|12.3
Summary|[13/14 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107127
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21d09955d2b7755db7d5ba3cd4a314930b470da7
commit r11-10682-g21d09955d2b7755db7d5ba3cd4a314930b470da7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107127
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21ffe7bc50422bbf2fc844f4e69a16d7e8d35698
commit r11-10683-g21ffe7bc50422bbf2fc844f4e69a16d7e8d35698
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07b397d7720c062d91669d49fbfb644fb3eb81d8
commit r11-10684-g07b397d7720c062d91669d49fbfb644fb3eb81d8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f187d4c17546df91c3b6b9c0912403d14c6eb3c8
commit r11-10686-gf187d4c17546df91c3b6b9c0912403d14c6eb3c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562
commit r11-10685-g511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:945edfa2d24e310bf3549a16f2ea4c881a9a138a
commit r11-10690-g945edfa2d24e310bf3549a16f2ea4c881a9a138a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b580f5d7cb3c23866cdbd19e3c1bfc407e9e9c5
commit r11-10688-g9b580f5d7cb3c23866cdbd19e3c1bfc407e9e9c5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a0fd69bb3aa1709f0bea5d6b91fb30ca226c1ed
commit r11-10687-g5a0fd69bb3aa1709f0bea5d6b91fb30ca226c1ed
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108151
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab03e6bdc590393a36d62cf14fe0280529c933ae
commit r11-10692-gab03e6bdc590393a36d62cf14fe0280529c933ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8f95474581843c605bb97ba83d482d642da3a1b
commit r11-10695-gd8f95474581843c605bb97ba83d482d642da3a1b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
