https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>And I've tracked this down to the following old gcc/ChangeLog-2007 entry:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/65dd6fd50708231259v2dce17f4m1ff55e22f221a...@mail.gmail.com/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So from what I understand this part is what you want:
```
diff --git a/gcc/gcc.cc b/gcc/gcc.cc
index 16bb07f2cdc..2825ef3f037 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc.cc
+++ b/gcc/gcc.cc
@@ -1471,12 +1471,12 @@ static const str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Might be a daft question, but which cases besides
INTEGER_CST are supposed to be captured by the CONSTANT_CLASS_P?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109513
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is interesting because the C++ front-end causes slightly different IR and
with __builtin_unreachable produces decent code at -O3 still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109524
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, 07:54 Andrew Pinski via Gcc-help,
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:41 PM Puneet Kumar Yatnal (QUIC) via
> Gcc-bugs wrote:
> >
> >
> > ++
> > From: Puneet Kumar Yatnal (QUIC)
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 9:26 AM
> > To: gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Y2038: GCC gthr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> Might be a daft question, but which cases besides
> INTEGER_CST are supposed to be captured by the CONSTANT_CLASS_P?
For bit_and/bit_ior, VECTOR_CST (I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
Here issue is weakref symbol in gcc not using the __asm_ function pointed by
pthread.h instead its calling directly ___pthread_cond_timedwait which is
exposed by version_symbol in pthread_cond_wait.c of glibc
From: Jonathan Wakely
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 12:53 PM
To: Andrew Pinski
Cc: Pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109513
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This is interesting because the C++ front-end causes slightly different IR
> and with __builtin_unreachable produces decent code at -O3 still.
The difference is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> You can achieve result with the following command with C-Vise:
> cvise -c 'timeout 5 g++ -std=c++14 -march=znver3 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
> -Wall ArithmeticSubt
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, 09:27 Puneet Kumar Yatnal (QUIC), <
quic_pune...@quicinc.com> wrote:
> Here issue is weakref symbol in gcc not using the __asm_ function pointed
> by pthread.h instead its calling directly ___pthread_cond_timedwait which
> is exposed by version_symbol in pthread_cond_wait.c of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109527
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> For bit_and/bit_ior, VECTOR_CST (I would assume).
Ah, yeah. But then I don't think a top-level POLY_INT_CST_P
cuts it. We'd have the same prob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-17
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
>
> --- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> ---
> Might be a daf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
--- Comment #15 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> > > For bit_and/bit_ior, VECTOR_CST (I wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-17
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95825
daniel.klauer at gin dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.klauer at gin dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
Bug ID: 109535
Summary: internal compiler error: in finalize_new_accesses, at
rtl-ssa/changes.cc:471
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95825
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to daniel.klauer from comment #7)
> Reduced test case:
>
>
> template
> struct tc_optional_base
> {
> // default ctor leaves m_storage uninitialized
> tc_optional_base() : m_initializ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
Created attachment 54874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54874&action=edit
preprocessed source
% gcc-13 --version
gcc-13 (Debian 13-20230411-1) 13.0.1 20230411 (experimental) [maste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95825
--- Comment #9 from daniel.klauer at gin dot de ---
Unless I'm missing something, this is not about unions. boost::optional (at
least from boost 1.80.0) does not always use unions; instead it has two
possible implementations: optional_base, which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
The assert in question fires if the pass creates an instruction
whose pattern uses a register or memory and if the pass doesn't
provide associated use information. Let me know if it looks lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Thanks for the link to the patch submission though I find the
"-fdirectives-only option is incompatible with assembly" statement puzzling.
> So from what I understand this part is what you want:
>
> - "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109524
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f66ae49bba7d3b8c999498a0e166c0a2f99ec61a
commit r13-7203-gf66ae49bba7d3b8c999498a0e166c0a2f99ec61a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109524
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108807
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d39451523912981e897faa7942a2634c058524fb
commit r12-9405-gd39451523912981e897faa7942a2634c058524fb
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108699
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de8f86e151d29c6c2ebb224b5587284714cd6cfa
commit r12-9406-gde8f86e151d29c6c2ebb224b5587284714cd6cfa
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108807
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:043cc707f449076ea704a12fff60e32f5861dfcb
commit r11-10627-g043cc707f449076ea704a12fff60e32f5861dfcb
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108699
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6872f055d7d4fd36b804bdd9b5a8a128b01aacbc
commit r11-10628-g6872f055d7d4fd36b804bdd9b5a8a128b01aacbc
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108699
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88e488ec9321e44291fcaf2a3b14333f64aac01
commit r10-11291-gd88e488ec9321e44291fcaf2a3b14333f64aac01
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108807
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105676
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96785885ceed34638d4b58e88cba6e6e8368c0e3
commit r12-9407-g96785885ceed34638d4b58e88cba6e6e8368c0e3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:377efe66243a3ec9d44707e3526742aa3d924094
commit r12-9408-g377efe66243a3ec9d44707e3526742aa3d924094
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109219
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2ab46f377313da5336748eb4fdc20020c047445
commit r12-9409-gc2ab46f377313da5336748eb4fdc20020c047445
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109491
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba02c6706cc502ee64b9c5d32b08409c44fe967d
commit r12-9413-gba02c6706cc502ee64b9c5d32b08409c44fe967d
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109263
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42b3d387f7335a4bc8846e3b7a2a78fb47be68b2
commit r12-9410-g42b3d387f7335a4bc8846e3b7a2a78fb47be68b2
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109502
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08605396d164c57eb3c80051001b86b96da0405c
commit r12-9414-g08605396d164c57eb3c80051001b86b96da0405c
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109469
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cc16b95d5d63b18cbc0aa780ffb6b460c791351
commit r12-9411-g9cc16b95d5d63b18cbc0aa780ffb6b460c791351
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109473
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:053668dbf11bb61c63fa7db5b3bccd0fdac9e726
commit r12-9412-g053668dbf11bb61c63fa7db5b3bccd0fdac9e726
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
Thanks for reporting it. We will take a look at it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.3|11.4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #1)
> Created attachment 54874 [details]
> preprocessed source
>
> % gcc-13 --version
> gcc-13 (Debian 13-20230411-1) 13.0.1 20230411 (experimental) [master
> r13-71
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly cleaned up:
template
using A = int *;
template class U>
struct B { typedef U type; };
struct C { typedef int *type; };
template
struct D {
D foo () { return D (); }
template class U>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #5 from Kito Cheng ---
Confirmed the the output is text file, it's just suffixed with .out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109491
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb400f9916beab1a650d59c73672ef48aaf71b11
commit r11-10629-gbb400f9916beab1a650d59c73672ef48aaf71b11
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104450
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9dcc5d68cd935c9ff0ef023fe8b3bd7ab67d0687
commit r11-10630-g9dcc5d68cd935c9ff0ef023fe8b3bd7ab67d0687
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109434
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d2210dafd872e8470e2a6ae5eea74d2669bc055
commit r12-9415-g3d2210dafd872e8470e2a6ae5eea74d2669bc055
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104464
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfd4a86221bc647eaa1c418eb777499250804df6
commit r11-10631-gcfd4a86221bc647eaa1c418eb777499250804df6
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105484
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caf0a30b17a639ee19ff4c138d3be0325d0be745
commit r11-10632-gcaf0a30b17a639ee19ff4c138d3be0325d0be745
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 109434, which changed state.
Bug 109434 Summary: [12 Regression] std::optional weird -Wmaybe-uninitialized
and behaviour with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109434
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106740
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note this is P1 on the GCC 11 branch only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Better don't reuse U for two different parameters:
template
using A = int *;
template class U>
struct B { typedef U type; };
struct C { typedef int *type; };
template
struct D {
D foo () { return D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68994
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109520
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e08c7886eed5824bebd0e011526ec302d622844
commit r13-7206-g8e08c7886eed5824bebd0e011526ec302d622844
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107769
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e08c7886eed5824bebd0e011526ec302d622844
commit r13-7206-g8e08c7886eed5824bebd0e011526ec302d622844
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #53 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81745
--- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> GCC removed the pedwarning on purpose (between GCC 4.1 and 4.4), see PR
> 14331 and PR 68994.
No, PR 14331 was just asking to remove the warning by default,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is just missed optimization and likely to be resolved only for GCC 14 and
perhaps later backported. Downgrading to P2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109500
--- Comment #10 from Leandro Lupori ---
Wouldn't it be better to turn this into a warning?
Although using the result of a function as an allocatable argument doesn't
conform with Fortran standards, it has been supported by gfortran for quite
so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109536
Bug ID: 109536
Summary: Failure to compile constexpr std::vector with
-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
I suppose we're just neglecting to canonicalize a bound ttp's substituted args
before determining its canonical type. Adding a call to coerce_template_parms
or canonicalize_type_argument seems to fix it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104515
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. The issue is that store motion of v_7(D)->end cannot be
> performed on
>
>[local count: 955630225]:
> # i_13 = PHI
> _1 = v_7(D)->end;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109537
Bug ID: 109537
Summary: Improve code generation for dynamic loop unrolling
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109104
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109537
--- Comment #1 from Li Jia He ---
Update gcc's assembly as gcc did not turn on auto vectorization during O2,
The compilation command for gcc is 'cc1 unroll.c -O3 -funroll-loops',
The compilation command for clang is 'clang unroll.c -O3 -S'
'''
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108910
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66700dde0dfb2c2b07d771f90df1fe16d1d61ce9
commit r12-9416-g66700dde0dfb2c2b07d771f90df1fe16d1d61ce9
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108910
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
--- Comment #6 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12 Regression] csmith:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107769
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] -flto |[12 Regression] -flto with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105440
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Boris Kolpackov from comment #4)
> Thanks for the link to the patch submission though I find the
> "-fdirectives-only option is incompatible with assembly" statement puzzling.
>
> > So from wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-17
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2)
> The assert in question fires if the pass creates an instruction
> whose pattern uses a register or memory and if the pass doesn't
> provide associated use in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106227
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109535
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Can you quote a dump of the new insn pattern? Or just:
dump(change);
in function_info::finalize_new_accesses should do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #38 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027
--- Comment #10 from Ben Woodard ---
Currently Libabigail is not able to detect this kind of ABI break. We would be
able to detect this if https://dwarfstd.org/issues/221105.1.html were
implemented. As mentioned in the DWARF issue, this would al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107041
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If this is really just because it is a builtin, I think another possibility
would be
make it BT_FN_INT_VAR instead of BT_FN_INT_INT and verify it has just one
argument which
is either int or the particularly
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
