[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- I've just isolated that to celt/kiss_fft.c, can you confirm the change comes from the file?

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Where I see the following change in optimized dump: float _423; float _424; float _425; + vector(4) float _442; + vector(2) double _443; void * _742; unsigned int _743; const struct kiss_

[Bug analyzer/109225] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false negative with *c = 404

2023-03-21 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109225 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #9 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm I was seeing the change in opus_ifft but that does look like different codegen :/ I might not be looking at the right thing. That transformation looks definitely wrong though as the selectio

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- So are we talking about typedef float V __attribute__((vector_size (16))); typedef int VI __attribute__((vector_size (16))); V foo (V x, V y) { V a = x - y; V b = y + x; return __builtin_shuffle (b,

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina --- Neither of those vec_perms are valid targets for this optimization. It looks like sel.series_p is not doing what I expected. It's matching even elements and ignoring the odd ones.

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/109177] Call to C++ function marked unavailable gets diagnosed twice

2023-03-21 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109177 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Jakub, you are too fast! Anyway, nice test-case. So far I was able to come to something semi-reduced: typedef struct { float r; float i; } kiss_fft_cpx; kiss_fft_cpx *kf_bfly2_Fout, *opus_fft_impl_Fout

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think series_p clearly documents that: /* Return true if index OUT_BASE + I * OUT_STEP selects input element IN_BASE + I * IN_STEP. For example, the call to test whether a permute reverses a vector

[Bug d/109231] [13 regression] Comparison failure in libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.o

2023-03-21 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- > No luck reproducing this using a cross. Ok, so I'll continue with the reghunt. > So, could you please attach -fdump-tree-optimized -da dumps

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/match.pd.jj 2023-02-18 12:38:30.967022708 +0100 +++ gcc/match.pd2023-03-21 17:24:54.964665797 +0100 @@ -8096,6 +8096,7 @@ and, scalar_mode inner_mode = GET_MODE_INNER (vec_mode);

[Bug c++/109177] Call to C++ function marked unavailable gets diagnosed twice

2023-03-21 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109177 --- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > FWIW one way to test against duplicate errors currently is something like: > > void f() __attribute__((unavailable)); // { dg-bogus "is unavailable.*is > unavaila

[Bug c/109237] New: csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time

2023-03-21 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
minated. real2m1.255s user1m58.650s sys 0m1.593s $ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -v 2>&1 | fgrep exp gcc version 13.0.1 20230321 (experimental) (0963cb5fde158cce) So the version I used seems to include today's patch from Andrew Macleod for timing reduction.

[Bug middle-end/109237] csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time

2023-03-21 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection, |

[Bug modula2/109125] [13 regression] SIGBUS in m2pim_ldtoa_ldtoa

2023-03-21 Thread gaius at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/109183] [regression?] since GCC 11.1, -MM -MMD generates "a-" prefixed dependency files

2023-03-21 Thread yann at droneaud dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109183 Yann Droneaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yann at droneaud dot fr --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/109238] New: [13 Regression] tst-realloc.i:42:19: error: pointer ‘p’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free] in glibc tests

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238 Bug ID: 109238 Summary: [13 Regression] tst-realloc.i:42:19: error: pointer ‘p’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free] in glibc tests Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/109238] [13 Regression] tst-realloc.i:42:19: error: pointer ‘p’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free] in glibc tests

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99036] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_current_interface_head, at fortran/interface.c:4699

2023-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd282b16bfd3c6e218dffb7798a375365b10ae22 commit r13-6790-gdd282b16bfd3c6e218dffb7798a375365b10ae22 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug target/109236] [avr] Invalid code of signed 16-bit compare optimization

2023-03-21 Thread dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109236 Dimitar Dimitrov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/109238] [13 Regression] tst-realloc.i:42:19: error: pointer ‘p’ may be used after ‘realloc’ [-Werror=use-after-free] in glibc tests

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- c = realloc (p, -1); ... ; if (c != ((void *)0) ) support_exit_failure_impl (1, "tst-realloc.c", 120, "realloc (p, -1) succeeded."); c = p; ...

[Bug c++/108795] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in prep_operand, at cp/call.cc:6325 since r7-2549-gf3365c1201908df5

2023-03-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108795 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/109239] New: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check seen on Linux kernel due to inlining with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks

2023-03-21 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109239 Bug ID: 109239 Summary: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check seen on Linux kernel due to inlining with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109230 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54725&action=edit gcc13-pr109230.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/109240] New: Missed fneg/fsub optimization

2023-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109240 Bug ID: 109240 Summary: Missed fneg/fsub optimization Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/109223] parameters for a type on IMPLICIT do not work. For example: IMPLICIT TYPE(REAL(KIND=REAL128)) fails

2023-03-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109223 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:57:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109223 > > --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to urbanjost fr

[Bug fortran/97592] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrectly set pointer remapping with array pointer argument to CONTIGUOUS dummy

2023-03-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.5.0, 8.5.0 Keywor

[Bug fortran/97592] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrectly set pointer remapping with array pointer argument to CONTIGUOUS dummy

2023-03-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/109237] csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note it seems worse with checking enabled as it is verification that takes a long time.

[Bug fortran/109223] parameters for a type on IMPLICIT do not work. For example: IMPLICIT TYPE(REAL(KIND=REAL128)) fails

2023-03-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109223 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:27:58PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > So, there is a chunk of code in decl.cc(4682-4689 or so), > > if (implicit_flag == 1) > { > if (matched_type && gfc_match_char (')

[Bug target/85048] [missed optimization] vector conversions

2023-03-21 Thread mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- Most of the conversions are optimized perfectly now. Only the following conversions are still missing for AVX-512: https://godbolt.org/z/9afWbYod6 #include template using V [[gnu::vector_size(Size)

[Bug middle-end/109237] csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- cfg cleanup: 10.35 ( 5%) 0.00 ( 0%) 10.36 ( 4%) 7072 ( 0%) trivially dead code: 29.89 ( 14%) 0.00 ( 0%) 29.89 ( 13%) 352 ( 0%) tree CFG cleanup

[Bug debug/109237] csmith: another timeout with -g -O3 this time

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109237 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |debug --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/109241] New: [13 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since for ccache package r13-6722-gb323f52ccf966800

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241 Bug ID: 109241 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since for ccache package r13-6722-gb323f52ccf966800 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/109241] [13 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since for ccache package r13-6722-gb323f52ccf966800

2023-03-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/109241] [13 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since for ccache package r13-6722-gb323f52ccf966800

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced almost all the way: ``` void g() { [](auto) { []() { ({ struct __attribute__FMT_COMPILE_STRING {}; }); }; }(1); } ```

[Bug fortran/104572] ICE in gfc_resolve_finalizers, at fortran/resolve.cc:13646

2023-03-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104572 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/104572] ICE in gfc_resolve_finalizers, at fortran/resolve.cc:13646

2023-03-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104572 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:02:14PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > > Self explanatory. > > > > diff --git a/

[Bug target/109236] [avr] Invalid code of signed 16-bit compare optimization

2023-03-21 Thread gandalf at winds dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109236 gandalf at winds dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UN

[Bug bootstrap/92709] Cross Compilation failed for Latest GCC riscv64-linux-gnu on Linux/WSL2

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92709 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/109242] New: C++2b std::optional::transform omits required std::remove_cv_t from return optional type

2023-03-21 Thread pkasting at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242 Bug ID: 109242 Summary: C++2b std::optional::transform omits required std::remove_cv_t from return optional type Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/109242] C++2b std::optional::transform omits required std::remove_cv_t from return optional type

2023-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/96297] Redundant zero extension after inlining the function

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96297 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew P

[Bug target/98596] registers not reused on RISC-V

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98596 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement CC|

[Bug c++/109181] requires expression type requirement rejects valid type when it is a nested member template

2023-03-21 Thread waffl3x at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109181 --- Comment #5 from waffl3x --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > A workaround is to just remove the unneeded 'template' after the :: in this > case. Or is there an example where the template keyword is needed that we > incorrectly

[Bug c++/109243] New: Side cast of pointer-to-member with UB is incorrectly accepted in constant evaluation

2023-03-21 Thread de34 at live dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109243 Bug ID: 109243 Summary: Side cast of pointer-to-member with UB is incorrectly accepted in constant evaluation Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Ke

[Bug target/85048] [missed optimization] vector conversions

2023-03-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug fortran/109223] parameters for a type on IMPLICIT do not work. For example: IMPLICIT TYPE(REAL(KIND=REAL128)) fails

2023-03-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109223 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-22 Ever confirmed

[Bug target/85048] [missed optimization] vector conversions

2023-03-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048 --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7) > Yes, Looks like the pattern name is misdefined. > it shoud be fixuns_trunc, but we have ufix_trunc. No, we have the right name but generate extra instructions for un

[Bug modula2/107630] runtime libs should be self-contained

2023-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107630 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573dbd5175dbf16a3b4551ec55800febf0d1b617 commit r13-6795-g573dbd5175dbf16a3b4551ec55800febf0d1b617 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Wed

[Bug target/85048] [missed optimization] vector conversions

2023-03-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- With the patch, we can generate optimized code expect for those 16 {u,}qq cases, since the ABI doesn't support 1024-bit vector. 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 18

[Bug libstdc++/109242] C++2b std::optional::transform omits required std::remove_cv_t from return optional type

2023-03-21 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC --

[Bug libstdc++/109242] C++2b std::optional::transform omits required std::remove_cv_t from return optional type

2023-03-21 Thread pkasting at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109242 --- Comment #2 from Peter Kasting --- (In reply to TC from comment #1) > The missing remove_cv_t is real, but this example is invalid. As the linked > cppreference page notes, you cannot pass a PMD to transform. Ah, true! How about this then: h

[Bug target/109228] warning: implicit declaration of function '__riscv_vlenb'

2023-03-21 Thread juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109228 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong --- Fixed by the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/614397.html Let's wait for review and merged. Thanks.

[Bug target/106543] [10/11/12 Regression] *sge_ uses operand 2 but there is no operand 2

2023-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-22 Known to work|

[Bug d/109231] [13 regression] Comparison failure in libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.o

2023-03-21 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- >> No luck reproducing this using a cross. > > Ok, so I'll conti

<    1   2