[Bug tree-optimization/108322] Using __register parameter with -ftree-vectorize (default with -O2) results in massive code bloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108322 --- Comment #1 from David Korth --- Some quick testing with Compiler Explorer at godbolt.org shows that this behavior started with gcc-8.1, and it doesn't happen with gcc-7.x or earlier.

[Bug target/108322] Using __restrict parameter with -ftree-vectorize (default with -O2) results in massive code bloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Component|tre

[Bug c++/108323] New: combine does not change the locale name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108323 Bug ID: 108323 Summary: combine does not change the locale name Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #6 from Jan Dubiec --- Jonathan, I am not sure to what part of the thread "above" refers to, but build fails indeed. This time due to a different reason. This is what I got when I was trying to build f7bd48c6. Please note -mn -mint32

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Fixed, but the build still fails as mentioned above. See comment 3

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Dubiec from comment #6) > Please note -mn -mint32 options – > normal mode (aka 16-bit mode) with 32-bit integers. Has this bizarre mode ever been able to build libstdc++? I have too many

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The reason it fails is here: D:/Works/xcomp/gcc-build/h8300-elf/normal/int32/libstdc++-v3/include/span:147:7: note: candidate: 'constexpr std::span<_Type, _Extent>::span() requires _Extent + 1 <= 1 [with

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- The fix would be changing the constraint to: _Extent == dynamic_­extent || _Extent == 0

[Bug libstdc++/108323] combine does not change the locale name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108323 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108324] New: Temporary not bound to reference in default member initializer destroyed early from parenthesized expression-list initialization of aggregate

path,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib64,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib32 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20230106 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug analyzer/108325] New: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive with *f = 42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108325 Bug ID: 108325 Summary: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive with *f = 42 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/108326] New: Question about definitions in c++config.h for gcc13 20221229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108326 Bug ID: 108326 Summary: Question about definitions in c++config.h for gcc13 20221229 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/108300] `abort()` macro cause bootstrap failure on *-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:902c755930326cb4405672aa3ea13c35c653cbff commit r13-5055-g902c755930326cb4405672aa3ea13c35c653cbff Author: LIU Hao Date: Fri Jan

[Bug target/108322] Using __restrict parameter with -ftree-vectorize (default with -O2) results in massive code bloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108322 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug testsuite/108280] [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Martin Lišk

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=znver3 since r13-4685-g4834e9360f7bf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #17 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #16) > I have posted the sorting patch to the mailing list: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609459.html I confirm the test fixes ori

[Bug middle-end/108312] NULL definition in system.h is no longer needed any more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108312 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška

[Bug middle-end/108311] system.h defines va_copy but we require C++11 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108311 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/93082] macOS Authorization.h needs fixinclude

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082 --- Comment #14 from Sam James --- This seems to be fixed in the latest macOS SDK (13.1 at least). But obviously that doesn't help folks who need to use older SDKs.

[Bug jit/102824] building pdf/dvi documentation for libgccjit fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6) > @marxin is this something you checked during the sphinx conversion and > reversion at all? (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > Well, running 'make latexp

[Bug testsuite/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e commit r11-10455-g65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e Author: Francois-Xavie

[Bug testsuite/47334] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e commit r11-10455-g65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e Author: Francois-Xavier

[Bug testsuite/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef commit r10-11152-g7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef Author: Francois-Xavie

[Bug testsuite/47334] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef commit r10-11152-g7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef Author: Francois-Xavier

[Bug testsuite/108280] [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108313] New: smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort() redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313 Bug ID: 108313 Summary: smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort() redefinition Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/108292] [13 Regression] wrong code with vector compare & mask at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108292 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/108308] [13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and -O2 with "-fno-tree-ccp" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Resolu

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- That test expects fopen("noreplace", "wx") to fail if the file already exists. Does this fail too? #include #include #include int main() { FILE* f = fopen("noreplace", "w"); assert(f != NULL);

[Bug c++/108313] smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort() redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313 --- Comment #1 from niXman --- file/line to the buggy line: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=libcpp/system.h;h=e80cf029d88fcb74db5515b4b2915d72df0974dc;hb=refs/heads/master#l404

[Bug c++/108313] smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort() redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/108300] `abort()` macro cause bootstrap failure on *-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.nixman at autistici dot org --- Comme

[Bug c++/108313] smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort() redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313 --- Comment #3 from niXman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Dup of bug 108300 > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108300 *** ah, got it. thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect hpux does not implement a c11 fopen but only a c99 one .. "x" was only added for c11 . Hpux11.11 came out in 2009 after all.

[Bug target/108308] [13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and -O2 with "-fno-tree-ccp" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108308 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681 commit r13-5043-gb990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/108292] [13 Regression] wrong code with vector compare & mask at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108292 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681 commit r13-5043-gb990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/106133] ICE: SIGSEGV in diagnostic_output_format_init_json_file() with -fdiagnostics-format=json-file -E

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106133 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused since r13-1544-ge46f4d7430c52104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[13 Regression] `pra

[Bug c++/108286] [12 Regression] OpenMP Target directive causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108286 --- Comment #5 from Jan André Reuter --- I tried to compile and run the source code I uploaded when creating the ticket. I used the latest daily bump: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=53ef7c1d9a44a2c681d4b3433a853cd4461be8c5 The pr

[Bug tree-optimization/108314] New: [13 Regression] Segfault in gimple-match-head.cc:do_valueize when vectorizing for SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108314 Bug ID: 108314 Summary: [13 Regression] Segfault in gimple-match-head.cc:do_valueize when vectorizing for SVE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- But then wouldn't using "x" with fopen fail, return NULL, and set errno to EINVAL? It shouldn't just ignore the "x".

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- My assumption was that targets that don't support exclusive mode for fopen would fail in exactly that way, and so using std::ios::noreplace would be "conservatively unsupported". That is, it would always f

[Bug libstdc++/106611] std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible returns wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106611 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #7 from Jian

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug c++/108047] [13 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr since r13-4564-gd081807d8d70e3e8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54201 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54201&action=edit gcc13-pr108047.patch My current understanding is that even if nothing in the initializer is dependent maybe_in

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/108315] New: -mcpu=power10 changes ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315 Bug ID: 108315 Summary: -mcpu=power10 changes ABI Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI, wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug driver/108307] ICE compiling .S file with -fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108307 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug middle-end/106133] ICE: SIGSEGV in diagnostic_output_format_init_json_file() with -fdiagnostics-format=json-file -E

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106133 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 108307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/108309] [12 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_component_reference, at cp/constexpr.cc:4136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108309 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug target/108316] New: [13 Regression] ICE in maybe_gen_insn via expand_SCATTER_STORE when vectorizing for SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108316 Bug ID: 108316 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in maybe_gen_insn via expand_SCATTER_STORE when vectorizing for SVE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/108268] [13 Regression] Build failure on cross from powerpc64le-linux to nvptx-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108268 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/108314] [13 Regression] Segfault in gimple-match-head.cc:do_valueize when vectorizing for SVE since r13-707-g68e0063397ba82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108314 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-06 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug libstdc++/108288] Deadlock when using -fno-elide-constructor + -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 + -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108288 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9479ddc7a28fb672ca67304a67d66524d8200a4 commit r13-5044-gb9479ddc7a28fb672ca67304a67d66524d8200a4 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/108288] Deadlock when using -fno-elide-constructor + -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 + -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108288 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.5 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug middle-end/108300] `abort()` macro cause bootstrap failure on *-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300 --- Comment #5 from LIU Hao --- A quick and obvious fix is to add `CPPFLAGS='-DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN'` when configuring. Bootstrapped successfully on {i686,x86_64}-w64-mingw32. I still think GCC source files should be patched.

[Bug middle-end/107966] [10/11/12/13 Regression] option property Var(var) documentation seems cut off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107966 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17176326de45cc7de4f8cedf4414b40df0df39bb commit r13-5045-g17176326de45cc7de4f8cedf4414b40df0df39bb Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug middle-end/107966] [10/11/12/13 Regression] option property Var(var) documentation seems cut off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107966 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/108118] std::weak_ptr lacks a self-usurp check on move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.4 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/107799] Wrong return type for std::bit_width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107799 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/103755] {has,use}_facet() and iostream constructor performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103755 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/108316] [13 Regression] ICE in maybe_gen_insn via expand_SCATTER_STORE when vectorizing for SVE since r13-2737-g4a773bf2f08656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108316 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[13 Regression] ICE

[Bug target/108172] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4087 since r13-4616-g2cba118e538ba0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/108311] system.h defines va_copy but we require C++11 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108311 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/108312] NULL definition in system.h is no longer needed any more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108312 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/108172] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4087 since r13-4616-g2cba118e538ba0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108172 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug tree-optimization/107767] [13 Regression] switch to table conversion happening even though using btq is better

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107767 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- Oh, I didn't notice it's P1 :) Then sure, send it for this release.

[Bug target/108172] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4087 since r13-4616-g2cba118e538ba0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108172 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c330fd49464f3d47a7c171d767eb3a011add76b commit r13-5047-g8c330fd49464f3d47a7c171d767eb3a011add76b Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Ignoring unknown fopen flags is traditional behavior which is still present today, both in BSD and GNU. Only the first character is actually checked and rejected if unknown.

[Bug libstdc++/108305] FAIL: 27_io/basic_ofstream/open/char/noreplace.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/107453] [13 Regression] New stdarg tests in r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac2 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/108317] New: g++ is unable to capture vector-extended variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108317 Bug ID: 108317 Summary: g++ is unable to capture vector-extended variables Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug libstdc++/108214] [13 Regression] writinng bitset to stringstream fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108214 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:553332c19a04ad0a6bbdd2aafc3499a1cb4dfa0c commit r13-5048-g553332c19a04ad0a6bbdd2aafc3499a1cb4dfa0c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/108317] g++ is unable to capture vector-extended variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108317 --- Comment #1 from Janez Zemva --- Created attachment 54205 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54205&action=edit sample file demonstrating the bug

[Bug libstdc++/108214] [13 Regression] writinng bitset to stringstream fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108214 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106745] segfault in bpf_core_get_sou_member_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106745 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106773] libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol 'bpf_link_fops'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106773 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107843] error: incompatible type for argument in ___bpf_ctx_cast2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107843 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug modula2/108182] gm2 driver mishandles target and multilib options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108182 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #4) > > Created attachment 54184 [details] > > Potential fix for target multilib_dir handling -m and -f. > > > > Work in prog

[Bug c++/60512] would be useful if gcc implemented __has_feature similary to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512 Jessica Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/108318] New: Floating point calculation moved out of loop despite fesetround

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108318 Bug ID: 108318 Summary: Floating point calculation moved out of loop despite fesetround Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/108235] FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 54206 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54206&action=edit Updated preprocessed source

[Bug libstdc++/108235] FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- No. We still have the following symbols in tzdb.o: U __atomic_compare_exchange_4 U __atomic_fetch_add_4 U __atomic_fetch_add_8 U __at

[Bug ipa/106816] noreturn/pure attributes are not set correctly on multiversioned functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106816 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #9) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > > > @Martin: Do we have a declaration cloning code for functions somewhere? > > See e.g. cgraph_node::create_vir

[Bug libbacktrace/108297] libtool link b2test fails: Unrecognized argument: --build-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108297 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- It appears the --build-id issue is fixed by the change. But there's still a lto issue breaking make check: libtool: link: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir64/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/ objdir64/./pr

[Bug libstdc++/108260] __cpp_lib_ranges_zip feature test macro not defined while std::views::zip is supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108260 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7bd48c6bbd3d7a479943b248b973aaf6c59463b commit r13-5049-gf7bd48c6bbd3d7a479943b248b973aaf6c59463b Author: Patrick Palka Date: F

[Bug libstdc++/108260] __cpp_lib_ranges_zip feature test macro not defined while std::views::zip is supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108260 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93527] Internal compiler error when static_assert concept std::regular on class with variadic constrained constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c++/106361] [11/12/13 Regression] Internal compiler error when creating an out-of-line operator==() = default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/108318] Floating point calculation moved out of loop despite fesetround

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108318 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/108235] FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #10) > No. We still have the following symbols in tzdb.o: > U __atomic_compare_exchange_4 > U __atomic_fetch_add_4 Oh the ti

[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69482#c7 addresses the big issue here I think.

[Bug c++/108309] [12 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_component_reference, at cp/constexpr.cc:4136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108309 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/108318] Floating point calculation moved out of loop despite fesetround

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108318 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/34678] Optimization generates incorrect code with -frounding-math option (#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not implemented)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34678 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16989 Bug 16989 depends on bug 56020, which changed state. Bug 56020 Summary: FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56020 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/56020] FE_INVALID flag not set on comparison with NAN (unordered)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56020 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

  1   2   >