https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
Yibiao Yang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106887
Bug ID: 106887
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since
r13-2111-g6910cad55ffc330d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106887
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106847
--- Comment #3 from Avi Kivity ---
But I need it to be copied. It's a struct of options:
struct options {
bool frob = false;
[[derecated]] bool quux = false; // will be removed soon
bool grue = false;
};
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 53548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53548&action=edit
draft patch
Draft patch - the actual issue seems to work fine (first testcase, extended) –
however, I have sti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106874
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106874
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106888
Bug ID: 106888
Summary: [RISCV] Excess andi instructions are generated in
gcc.dg/pr90838.c
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Really, I see still the same:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20220908 (experimental)
$ gcc -O0 --coverage test.c; ./a.out; gcov a-test.c; cat test.c.gcov
File 'test.c'
Lines executed:80.00% of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106883
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106889
Bug ID: 106889
Summary: __builtin_strlen fails for some constexpr constructs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106888
--- Comment #1 from shihua at iscas dot ac.cn ---
This patch is
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=c23a9c87cc62bd177fd0d4db6ad34b34e1b9a31f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-08
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-08
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106890
Bug ID: 106890
Summary: virtual inheritance triggers compiler error when
instatiating derived class with in-class
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106890
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
--- Comment #2 from Krister Walfridsson ---
This optimization is invalid if (int)1 << 33 is _not_ undefined behavior in
GIMPLE!
Consider an architecture where (int)1 << 33 evaluates to 0. foo(2, 1, 33)
evaluates to 0 for the original GIMPLE, bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Meh.
After normalization [USE]:
_3 = PHI
is conditional on:
((v_8(D) != 1) AND (w_13(D) != 0) AND (NOT (doloop.5_18 != 0)))
who decided to use 'doloop' here ... :/ I'll fix the pattern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:794a01d7dcf306578bc5d0d147895c58a91506de
commit r13-2536-g794a01d7dcf306578bc5d0d147895c58a91506de
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8d3b44dfa2851659f966627835497667c5fed6c
commit r13-2537-gc8d3b44dfa2851659f966627835497667c5fed6c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
--- Comment #4 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Really, I see still the same:
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20220908 (experimental)
> $ gcc -O0 --coverage test.c; ./a.out; gcov a-test.c;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93680
Yibiao Yang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase that ICEs also on x86_64:
typedef __INTPTR_TYPE__ intptr_t;
typedef __UINTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t;
int a;
int
foo (const int *c)
{
uintptr_t d = ((intptr_t) c | (intptr_t) &a) & 65535 << 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99130
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4db3cb781c355341fa041e6b5bbbfc495c6a0fdb
commit r13-2540-g4db3cb781c355341fa041e6b5bbbfc495c6a0fdb
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99130
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53550&action=edit
gcc13-pr106878-1.patch
Ugh, this is a mess. The verifiers do allow BIT_AND_EXPR (intentionally for
realignmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53551&action=edit
gcc13-pr106878-2.patch
Or we can instead just tweak my r11-35-g496f4f884716ae06 change and avoid
creating poin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53552
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53552&action=edit
gcc13-pr106878-3.patch
Or we can revert parts of Andrew's change and allow BIT_NOT_EXPR on pointers
and OFFSET
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106870
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78ef801b7263606d27a6a752a40cbeecc584fb3d
commit r13-2541-g78ef801b7263606d27a6a752a40cbeecc584fb3d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
Bug ID: 106891
Summary: internal compiler error: in init_from_control_deps, at
gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106870
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
This fixes some cases but leaves others not fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
--- Comment #1 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Created attachment 53553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53553&action=edit
preprocessed source, gzipped to avoid bugzilla size limit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99209
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7280b04714c24af2854cf020b6e7b6ad3b7fba8
commit r13-2542-gf7280b04714c24af2854cf020b6e7b6ad3b7fba8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99209
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:338a5b0d7da84ef1f6c01dd96abf2c6bc830f403
commit r13-2544-g338a5b0d7da84ef1f6c01dd96abf2c6bc830f403
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106485
--- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
I think that's different. Actually, I think it's Clang that's wrong. As
mentioned at
https://cpplang.slack.com/archives/C21PKDHSL/p1656857369259539?thread_ts=1656856509.892079&cid=C21PKDHSL:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106889
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You can either use char_traits::length (which is actually required to
work in constexpr) or use __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() instead of your
workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
--- Comment #16 from Andy Lutomirski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> Patient: Doctor it hurts when I do this.
> Doctor: then don't do that and if you read the instructions I gave you I
> told you I would hurt this way.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106625
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tim Lange :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a6564c9b277d9f93582605758d57457de696deb
commit r13-2546-g7a6564c9b277d9f93582605758d57457de696deb
Author: Tim Lange
Date: Wed Sep 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106889
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I think std::strlen isn't constexpr even in latest C++, so all of this is
> permitted by the standard...
Right, which is why I recommend using char_traits::le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106838
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30c811f2bac73e63e0b461ba7ed3805b77898798
commit r13-2550-g30c811f2bac73e63e0b461ba7ed3805b77898798
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106838
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 88101, which changed state.
Bug 88101 Summary: Implement P0528R3, C++20 cmpxchg and padding bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 88101, which changed state.
Bug 88101 Summary: Implement P0528R3, C++20 cmpxchg and padding bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98862
Ye Luo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106670
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:264deecb16abcfc8ca8efe9b94b0ad55febd55cc
commit r13-2552-g264deecb16abcfc8ca8efe9b94b0ad55febd55cc
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106670
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106874
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106892
Bug ID: 106892
Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106893
Bug ID: 106893
Summary: auto deduces wrong type for function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106892
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106893
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106894
Bug ID: 106894
Summary: [13 regression] multiple libgomp failures after
r13-2545-g9f2fca56593a2b
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
71 matches
Mail list logo
