https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106496
Bug ID: 106496
Summary: [13 Regression] bootstrap fail with out of bounds
subscript warning on i686-darwin9
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106496
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d8637208d35f78b51f8cff38c984836ab2c860f
commit r13-1914-g5d8637208d35f78b51f8cff38c984836ab2c860f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
Should be fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106466
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106466
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> the segfault is sort of spurious, its an about 1/5 to 1/7 chance for me. Is
> that something you can work with?
Please run the compiler under valgrind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106492
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-01
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
CC|rguenther at s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #1 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-01
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106482
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. ---
It would be good to have a specific minimum version of GCC in the documented
prerequisites, as the current text ("an existing GCC binary (version 4.8 or
later)", albeit referring to non-bootstrap builds)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Bug ID: 106497
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in duplicate_block, at
cfghooks.cc:1115
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106491
--- Comment #4 from Denis Yaroshevskiy ---
Thanks for the response, after testing with an updated gcc.
As far as the Ubuntu comment - I didn't quite understand that, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106481
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106498
Bug ID: 106498
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106486
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You mean accept -Wmissing-prototypes and silently ignore it (because it's
already an error)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106484
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
32-bit division by constant relies on a 32x32->64 bit multiply. So it seems
reasonable that a 64-bit division would need a 64x64->128 bit multiply. We
don't have an instruction for that on arm nor does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106498
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106183
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 53394
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53394&action=edit
Proposed patch: Unblock atomic wait on non-futex platforms
When using a mutex and condition variable, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106480
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2022-08-01 5:12 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106480
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so it's indeed an isolated path we warn on:
[local count: 2735590]:
_46 = global_options.x_param_max_fsm_thread_path_insns;
if (_46 <= n_insns_157)
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
[local co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106484
--- Comment #3 from rsaxvc at gmail dot com ---
> 32-bit division by constant relies on a 32x32->64 bit multiply.
I believe only the upper half of the bits are required for the product to
represent the integer component of the quotient. This mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
if (_233 != 0B)
goto ; [70.00%]
else
goto ; [30.00%]
;;succ: 113 [70.0% (guessed)] count:1263844 (estimated locally)
(TRUE_VALUE,EXECUTABLE)
;;111 [30.0% (guessed)] c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 53395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53395&action=edit
preprocessed source, trimmed at tail
preprocessed source for i686-pc-linux-gnu, reproduce with
./cc1plus -fp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53395|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106492
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
The following seems to fix it:
diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.cc b/gcc/omp-low.cc
index d73c165f029..1af18e92395 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-low.cc
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.cc
@@ -6244,7 +6244,8 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 53397
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53397&action=edit
patch
I'm testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104992
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Sam Feifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:388fbbd895e72669909173c3003ae65c6483a3c2
commit r13-1916-g388fbbd895e72669909173c3003ae65c6483a3c2
Author: Sam Feifer
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Adding some notes here as I work through this PR...
Even with floating aware VRP, we won't be able to do much because SCEV (which
ranger and VRP use) does not work with non-integers.
At EVRP time we see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106466
--- Comment #9 from tt_1 ---
started with pr105998
commit 20bb976fb6a853d4f79577278ac2f01622946b61
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:07:13 +
varasm: Fix up ICE in narrowing_initializer_constant_valid_p [PR105998]
The follo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106498
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. Before OMP expansion the loops do not define virtual operands.
After OMP expansion there's (useless) loop-around virtual operands.
SSA form is updated at
#0 update_ssa (update_flags=2048)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106495
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> So in this case we have
>
> (gdb) p *path->m_vec->m_vecdata[0]
> $106 = {e = 7)>, type = EDGE_COPY_SRC_BLOCK}
> (gdb) p *path->m_vec->m_vecdata[1]
> $107 = {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #26 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #19)
> We can use the original testcase as the litmus test for basic support if we
> compile it with
>
> -O2 -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts
>
> The unrol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105766
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
Bug ID: 106499
Summary: LTO runs forever in libfabric 1.15.1 linking
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Last detail.
I'm adding -Os to %build_cflags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106395
m101010a at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m101010a at gmail dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
This box has 256GB of RAM and ZERO swap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #4 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Other detail is that produces DSO libfabric.so.1.18.1 without LTO has only
1340096 bytest so question is why lto needs in this case +10GB of RAM?🤔
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #5 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
+100GB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> Author: jason
> Date: Sun Nov 13 06:51:23 2016
> New Revision: 242348
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242348&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> DR 374 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106263
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32566720f3a9135fa355f0304f024a79f107a1b8
commit r13-1918-g32566720f3a9135fa355f0304f024a79f107a1b8
Author: Jose E. Marchesi
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83782
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80928920147a109a7f8735bffc55a72cbe8db185
commit r13-1919-g80928920147a109a7f8735bffc55a72cbe8db185
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jul 20 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] |[meta-bug]
|[gimple_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Since gimple_can_duplicate_bb_p can now return false for returns_twice, there
might be other regressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
It might be useful do a test of having gimple_can_duplicate_bb_p return true
for all basic block again. as shown by PR 106497 and PR 106422 there definitely
is some in jump threading. And it might be able to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
Bug ID: 106500
Summary: ICE on invalid argument to c_sizeof()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Changed subject as it's unclear whether it is invalid or not. In any case,
this patch allows the code to compile and it produces the expected output.
% gfcx -o z a.f90
% ./z
4
16
diff --git a/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106457
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106457
--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am wondering whether the following:
12781 /* If the object itself is the array it is not at struct end. */
12782 if (DECL_P (ref_to_array))
12783 return false;
should be:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Bernd Buschinski from comment #4)
> Can someone tell me if this should be a new bug or is just a duplicate?
It's the same bug. The sanitizer transforms the source code into the following
IR (not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fix worked fine in my testing on trunk. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106481
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96e5f6696a1fa90493c464884984e9f1de86d817
commit r13-1920-g96e5f6696a1fa90493c464884984e9f1de86d817
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106278
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96e5f6696a1fa90493c464884984e9f1de86d817
commit r13-1920-g96e5f6696a1fa90493c464884984e9f1de86d817
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106450
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #7 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Hmm .. Martin even if that can be fixed in libfabric code does it still mean
that it something wrong with LO optimisation?
Sorry for asking maybe dumb question but this situation is not clear for me :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #7)
> Hmm .. Martin even if that can be fixed in libfabric code does it still mean
> that it something wrong with LO optimisation?
> Sorry for asking maybe dumb quest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106501
Bug ID: 106501
Summary: libstdc++ is built without -fPIC despite --with-pic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 106501 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106491
--- Comment #5 from Denis Yaroshevskiy ---
Tried with gcc-12, still the same issue.
gcc version 12.0.1 20220222 (experimental) [master r12-7325-g2f59f067610]
(Ubuntu 12-20220222-1ubuntu1)
Does that include the fix you talked about?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #9 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
[..]
> Basically with the flatten attribute and lto, every function needs to there
> and cloned and inlined causing a lot of memory and time really.
> Functions b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> [..]
> > Basically with the flatten attribute and lto, every function needs to there
> > and cloned and inlined c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106502
Bug ID: 106502
Summary: Three calls to __attribute__((const)) function
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alec Ari from comment #11)
> This fix worked for me:
>
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
> @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ if test "$enable_shared" = yes; then
>glib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> The flatten attribute is designed to override all heuristics in the compiler
> that is designed to not cause the gignatic memory usage and compile time.
> Bas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97498
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98e2676558f6f50cfb90610e5a160642a24d1596
commit r12-8648-g98e2676558f6f50cfb90610e5a160642a24d1596
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106499
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> > The flatten attribute is designed to override all heuristics in the compiler
> > that is designed to not caus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106415
--- Comment #7 from Undefined Opcode ---
(In reply to Undefined Opcode from comment #6)
A little more context:
Group 1:
cand costcompl. inv.expr. inv.vars
0 0 0 NIL;NIL;
1 0 0 NIL;NIL;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2ead00af2731e5551b15523ebf8f3e68c4e2ecb
commit r10-10924-ga2ead00af2731e5551b15523ebf8f3e68c4e2ecb
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a221c4b8e581d89c311f58c7c2e64c9d1f16c642
commit r10-10925-ga221c4b8e581d89c311f58c7c2e64c9d1f16c642
Author: Peter Bergner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd014105121275d1b226cb494277663d9181ab01
commit r11-10186-gcd014105121275d1b226cb494277663d9181ab01
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab1d329cb7d5ef19d234c37892c3268f063cf9c5
commit r11-10187-gab1d329cb7d5ef19d234c37892c3268f063cf9c5
Author: Peter Bergner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd521701c819710a244eae87b097b6acb534756b
commit r12-8650-gbd521701c819710a244eae87b097b6acb534756b
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f583aa1c56af983ca8f2b8bc57122c4be5a6e55
commit r12-8651-g5f583aa1c56af983ca8f2b8bc57122c4be5a6e55
Author: Peter Bergner
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247
Daniel Richard G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skunk at iskunk dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101438
Andrey Vihrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Vihrov ---
*** Bug 101438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
