https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106480
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-08-01 5:12 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106480 > > Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Keywords| |testsuite-fail > > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Both are guarded like > > p->a0[0] = 4; p->a0[1] = 5; // { dg-warning "\\\[-Wstringop-overflow" > "pr102706" { target { vect_slp_v2hi_store_align && { ! > vect_slp_v4hi_store_unalign } } } } > > the vect_slp_* predicates according to comments implement exactly the case in > the testsuite, but for some reason it doesn't work on hppa? Yes, I guess this implies a problem with # Return the true if target support vectorization of 4-byte short stores # with 4-byte aligned address at plain O2. proc check_effective_target_vect_slp_v2hi_store_align { } { set pattern {add new stmt: MEM <vector\(2\) short int>} set macro "TEST_V2HI_2" return [check_cached_effective_target vect_slp_v2hi_store_align { expr [check_vect_slp_store_usage $pattern $macro ] }] } # Return the true if target support vectorization of 8-byte short stores # with unaligned address at plain O2. # NB: This target should be removed after real issues are fixed for # -Wstringop-overflow with O2 vect. Be careful if you want to reuse # this target since tests in check_vect_slp_store_usage # is the exact match of relative testcases proc check_effective_target_vect_slp_v4hi_store_unalign { } { set pattern {add new stmt: MEM <vector\(4\) short int>} set macro "TEST_V4HI" return [check_cached_effective_target vect_slp_v4hi_store_unalign { expr [check_vect_slp_store_usage $pattern $macro ] }] } in target-supports.exp.
