https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #16)
> I think I might have hit the same thing in qt_readlink:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/847145. Martin, did you chase down the Qt issue you
> had?
Yes, for Qt5, one need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
commit r13-724-gb43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Fedorov ---
> Correct (even if it did exist it would only be for 10.7+) so --enable-tls is
> a configuration error.
>
> (as I have said several times, the idea of configure is to choose the
> correct settings for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Jakub - do you remember why you added the pass at this point, right after
> inlining but before scalar cleanup gets the chance to remove dead code?
Which exact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Bug ID: 105712
Summary: [13 Regression] Rejected valid code since
r13-76-gdcb4bd0789d13dd4
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this code is invalid (no diagnostic required; there was some talk about
changing this for C++23 to require a diagnostic) and GCC actually does the
right thing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, sorry, bad archeology, the pass_post_ipa_warn was indeed added by me and
the rationale for placing it where it is was given in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817#c9
The warning shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Another aspect is that the order of destructors in the class change its
behavior:
#include
template
struct X {
~X() requires (N==1);
virtual ~X();
};
// X is NOT polymorphic in GCC
static_assert( !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. We are expanding
MEM [(char *)&c] = { 0, 0 };
with 'c' expanded as
(concat:CQI (reg/v:QI 93 [ c ])
(reg/v:QI 94 [ c+1 ]))
doing read_complex_part from
(subreg:CQI (const_vector:V2QI [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Bug ID: 105713
Summary: [gimplefe] need a way to specify TREE_ADDRESSABLE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67491
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See Also|https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 103865, which changed state.
Bug 103865 Summary: virtual function can have a requires clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Bug ID: 105714
Summary: ASan in gcc trunk missed a buffer-overflow at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
commit r13-726-g4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Summary|ASan in gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning started to be given without -Wsystem-headers with r12-1992
It was already present with -Wsystem-headers, but suppressed by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning seems to have started with r11-5391
Before that there was no warning even with -Wsystem-headers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll have a look...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #18 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #17)
> libtool recently got a new maintainer and had a new release (2.4.7). It's
> possible 2.4.7 is related.
Fedora 36 still features an old version: libtool-2.4.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #19 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
I'm curious: Fedora 36 takes probably half an hour to be downloaded and
installed in a VM/chroot/etc., so you could probably debug the issue in a few
minutes ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note gcc sources have its own local copy of libtool so it does not matter what
the distros have.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Bug ID: 105715
Summary: [13 Regression] missed RTL if-conversion with
COND_EXPR change
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is we have:
[local count: 354334800]:
# h_21 = PHI
*c.3_5 = *d.2_4;
h_15 = h_21 + 1;
if (h_15 != 3)
goto ; [75.00%]
else
goto ; [25.00%]
[local count: 118111600]:
*c.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Bug ID: 105716
Summary: CTAD failure with member function returning auto as
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2022, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> The warning started to be given without -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91c7c5edd2c1d31bf379be1d077b39644391cc31
commit r13-727-g91c7c5edd2c1d31bf379be1d077b39644391cc31
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|CTAD failure with member|[12/13 Regression] CTAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Bug ID: 105717
Summary: [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] cannot create unordered_map
from range of types convertible to value_type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So I guess the trick might be to notice that ...
;; _2 = a_1(D) < b_10(D);
(insn 12 11 13 (set (reg:CCGC 17 flags)
(compare:CCGC (reg/v:DI 86 [ a ])
(reg/v:DI 87 [ b ]))) -1
(nil)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
--- Comment #12 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> How can changing the constructor priority in libgcc affect anything?
> Constructor priorities are within the same shared library or within the same
> executable, not i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3677eb80b683cead7db972bc206fd2e75d997bd2
commit r13-728-g3677eb80b683cead7db972bc206fd2e75d997bd2
Author: Bruno Haible
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4c0f9257ef2615add8ecb30e7a568755b692473
commit r12-8411-gf4c0f9257ef2615add8ecb30e7a568755b692473
Author: Martin Liska
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:394ff2fbfc84eb6d6cfc56b04e28ee9b42a5ab57
commit r12-8412-g394ff2fbfc84eb6d6cfc56b04e28ee9b42a5ab57
Author: Bruno Haible
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7a0e42a15eb53850496e91f2e484ed74ac3617
commit r13-738-g9e7a0e42a15eb53850496e91f2e484ed74ac3617
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105718
Bug ID: 105718
Summary: Forward Declarations of Constrained Partially
Specialized Class Templates Rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> > (as I have said several times, the idea of configure is to choose the
> > correct settings for the target _automatically_ - extra config options
> > should onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Shoudl be fixed.
Confirmed, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> If we try to do this for every irrelevant configure option, that's going to
> be quite a lot of work.
>
> Really [IMO, at least], configure options are not inten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105668
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:793f847ba7dbe7638f1c27178868edbefd3a8108
commit r13-739-g793f847ba7dbe7638f1c27178868edbefd3a8108
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10)
> I do not currently have a plan to try and build a second fix includes tree
> for Frameworks, but happy to review patches if someone else does :)
OK I'll open a s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12300
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44252
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #29 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Bug ID: 105719
Summary: RFE: fixincludes should handle Frameworks
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18469
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44425
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Configure options hard to |Configure options are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
--- Comment #30 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #29)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #28)
> > (I recently got a new laptop and am now on Catalina and ran into this bug,
> > so that's why I'm coming back to i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |egallager at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82383
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43301
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79ae75cc252154cf4ad75d28c3c909ff90f0cc76
commit r12-8413-g79ae75cc252154cf4ad75d28c3c909ff90f0cc76
Author: Qing Zhao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80782
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12)
> please could you be more specific about exactly what's not working?
> - i.e if you're on an older version of the OS.
> - version of Xcode.
So I'm assuming that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bootstrap error with|Bootstrap error with
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> OK I'll open a separate bug for that and self-assign
(that's bug 105719 now, for reference)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105720
Bug ID: 105720
Summary: std::views::split_view wrong behaviour in case of
partial match
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80782
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12)
> > please could you be more specific about exactly what's not working?
> > - i.e if you're on an older version of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > I'll probably keep --enable-objc-gc in my configure flags anyways even if it
> > becomes automatic, but becoming aut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8d636cbe38b6a369528f58227c96b2b77b1fd3a
commit r11-10029-gc8d636cbe38b6a369528f58227c96b2b77b1fd3a
Author: Qing Zhao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f4f7de787e5844515d27b2269fc472f95a9916a
commit r13-744-g2f4f7de787e5844515d27b2269fc472f95a9916a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Mar 11 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105666
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 105666, which changed state.
Bug 105666 Summary: RISC-V 507.cactuBSSN_r build has costly FMV instructions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105666
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Hm, looking in gcc/configure.ac (where these are defined), it looks like
there's a bunch of other flags that this bug could apply to, too...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44425
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
This would be done in the top-level configure script... where it looks like it
already does this for FreeBSD targets?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> Hm, looking in gcc/configure.ac (where these are defined), it looks like
> there's a bunch of other flags that this bug could apply to, too...
Note that I would t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105721
Bug ID: 105721
Summary: libbacktrace: update README
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation, easyhack
Severity: trivial
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
Arjan van de Ven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arjan at linux dot intel.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105720
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105718
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mate.kelemen.12 at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #18 from Sam James ---
Thanks. I reported the Qt issue upstream at
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-103782.
I've hit the ACL issue independently in Gentoo and will forward that upstream
too (https://bugs.gentoo.org/847280).
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
