https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> > Hmm, we have specific code to add scalar->vector(vmovq) cost to vector
> > construct, but it seems not to work here, gu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #5 from Chris Packham ---
Upstream issue raised https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55499 I still
think there's some work on the GCC side required as even without this specific
issue things have diverged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105615
--- Comment #2 from Pilar Latiesa ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Constraint subsumption is specified in terms of the normal form. When the
> concept C is made independent of the template parameter, the normal forms of
> C and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|Missed loop body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo