https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Would it be correct to move this test from g++.dg/tsan to g++.target/powerpc
> ? (Or, do I need to move pr69667.C back to its original location? Or, do I
> need to update the path within pr88018.C, which seems like the worst option?)
>
Based on my previous experience, the including doesn't make the dg directives
in the header file effective, so I guess the test case (pr88018.C) doesn't only
run on powerpc. How about copying the source code (throwing those dg-*) of
pr69667.C to pr88018.C to replace the include?
> Did I miss this because I used `--disable-libsanitizer`, or because I just
> missed that there was a FAIL for a test which I mistakenly thought was
> unrelated to my changes? (There are a lot of FAILs to ignore.)
Yes, I think it's due to "--disable-libsanitizer" configuration.
