https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105151
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> going down passes after errors is always tricky - we do stop but it seems
> the diagnostic passes are still run because they are part of "lowering"
> (why is p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
It looks like c_build_va_arg could be amended to reject FUNCTION_TYPE type.
But as said, not sure if this is valid or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The C++ frontend accepts this and diagnoses
In file included from t.c:1:
t.c: In function 'void foo(int, ...)':
t.c:6:15: warning: 'D()' is promoted to 'D (*)()' when passed through '...'
6 | va_arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> The C++ frontend accepts this and diagnoses
>
> In file included from t.c:1:
> t.c: In function 'void foo(int, ...)':
> t.c:6:15: warning: 'D()' is promoted t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105151
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e68f5c90bae44e886bd1b13a135dbfd00bceea0a
commit r12-7994-ge68f5c90bae44e886bd1b13a135dbfd00bceea0a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057
Bug 101057 depends on bug 105151, which changed state.
Bug 105151 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global with invalid
"gimple" language
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105151
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There are loads of similar bugs related to macros in system headers such as
NULL and UINT_MAX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67837
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c3e60933fa56dba47e75c88757395a73d38b04d
commit r10-10523-g8c3e60933fa56dba47e75c88757395a73d38b04d
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So it's GENERIC folding and get_call_combined_fn as opposed to the GIMPLE
variant does not verify argument compatibility. We have
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105155
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We fold this already before gimplification to
>
> ;; Function foo (null)
> ;; enabled by -tree-original
>
>
> {
> return a > 0 ? -2147483648(OVF) : 2147483646
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157
Bug ID: 105157
Summary: [12 Regression] compile-time regressions with generic
tuning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Bug ID: 105158
Summary: ftree-ccp drops DWARF const value attribute at
-Og/-O1/-O2/-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105159
Bug ID: 105159
Summary: -fipa-reference-addressable causes drop of DWARF
location info at -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105155
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
currently instruments (unlike e.g. the shift or division instrumentation) only
what falls through unfolded from the early passes (generic folding,
gimplification and up to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
> I think all are covered now.
Yes and no: while the test is now UNSUPPORTED on SPARC, it also became
UNSUPPORTED on x86 (both 32 and 64-bit) wher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Bug ID: 105160
Summary: [12 regression] ipa modref marks functions with asm
volatile as const or pure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, we ignore inlined edges during propagation!?
for (cgraph_edge *callee_edge = cur->callees; callee_edge;
callee_edge = callee_edge->next_callee)
{
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Shall I close it as FIXED, or keep it opening waiting for AMD response?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Besides missing AMD response, it isn't fully fixed, because the change is on
the libatomic side only.
So we still pay the cost to call those functions (and often PLT cost too) and
return from them.
For GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase:
extern void foo (void);
static inline int
bar (int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
foo ();
int y[1][i];
y[n][i] = 0;
}
}
int
baz (void)
{
return bar (5);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105158
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52748&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104071
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
- MEM [(int[1][0:D.1996] *)y.1_8][5]{lb: 0 sz: _6 * 4}[i_2]
= 0;
+ MEM [(int[1][0:D.1996] *)y.1_8][5]{lb: 0 sz: <<< error
>>>}[i_2] = 0;
find_interesting_uses_op fails to consider _6 * 4, in fact idx_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104073
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104293
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105161
Bug ID: 105161
Summary: variable constant-folded in its uses appears as
optimized out depending on where it is assigned
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93260
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
--- Comment #4 from Mike K. ---
Created attachment 52749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52749&action=edit
propose to return an error if constuct-name clashes with variable name
> Note, the prohibition in the standard is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
Bug ID: 105162
Summary: [AArch64] outline-atomics drops dmb ish barrier on
__sync builtins
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
Bug ID: 105163
Summary: ICE: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105164
Bug ID: 105164
Summary: new warning in clang, missing in gcc:
-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105165
Bug ID: 105165
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in
gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch, at tree-cfg.cc:6136
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
Bug ID: 105166
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range,
at tree-ssa-alias.cc:863
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
Bug ID: 105167
Summary: ICE in gfc_set_default_type, at fortran/symbol.cc:298
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
Bug ID: 105168
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_maybe_dereference_var, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:2870
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101677
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1de6612d994ada8edaab18bbc6afd8e9a57413aa
commit r12-7997-g1de6612d994ada8edaab18bbc6afd8e9a57413aa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d583d24200ac33a1cb281b7ddee9aad351151b5
commit r12-7998-g5d583d24200ac33a1cb281b7ddee9aad351151b5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8bc70cc17b0105e2c463a98c9ff76039d03ff60
commit r12-7999-ge8bc70cc17b0105e2c463a98c9ff76039d03ff60
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14814e20161d7b6a4e9cac244c7013fa56f71f55
commit r12-8000-g14814e20161d7b6a4e9cac244c7013fa56f71f55
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 103852, which changed state.
Bug 103852 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] Alias template argument deduction is
available in C++17 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
Bug 104552 depends on bug 104897, which changed state.
Bug 104897 Summary: wrong plural form in diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104897
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop ---
Also happens when compiling with LSE: -march=armv8.1-a or later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Created attachment 52750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52750&action=edit
patch
Fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 started to ICE with r0-122928-gf6b64c35014ca111711e753be85bb99280a1e115
#c1 as well if you don't omit the argument name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105169
Bug ID: 105169
Summary: Compiling C++ code with
-fpatchable-function-entry=16,14 results in references
to discarded sections
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105166
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase without warnings:
void
bar (foo, a)
void (**foo) ();
int a;
{
(foo)[1] = bar;
foo[1] (1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104812
--- Comment #6 from Mike K. ---
Thanks a lot for the guidance, posted patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
commit r12-8002-gd46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:892c7f03ae63121766a8be48f7e3b672547fd627
commit r12-8003-g892c7f03ae63121766a8be48f7e3b672547fd627
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus |[7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod ---
huh, so even after fixing the testcase, ranger is still tripping over this test
case.
uv1ti ashl_v1ti (uv1ti x, unsigned int i)
{
uv1ti _3;
:
_3 = x_1(D) << i_2(D);
return _3;
we have an ssa_na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
INTEGRAL_TYPE_P is only true for scalar integral types (integer, enum and
boolean).
Do you mean ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P instead which is true also for integral vector
and complex types?
Anyway, one can use eleme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-05
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
no... we won't process ranges for anything unless it passes supports_type_p ():
(INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || POINTER_TYPE_P (type)))
oh oh oh.
Never mind. I see. we are generating a range for i_2, and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think it's valid to reject this at compile time (rather than just
generating a runtime trap): the "such that the type of a pointer to an
object that has the specified type can be obtaine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbc9dd66484a51d450f78ab748a872b939c90c3f
commit r12-8004-gcbc9dd66484a51d450f78ab748a872b939c90c3f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 105139, which changed state.
Bug 105139 Summary: [12 Regression] GCC produces vmovw instruction with an
incorrect argument for -O3 -march=sapphirerapids since
r12-6215-g708b87dcb6e48cb4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 52753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52753&action=edit
fix?
I can't reproduce this with the top of either the 11 or 12 branches; if you
can, does this fix it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Macleod ---
We can use the original testcase as the litmus test for basic support if we
compile it with
-O2 -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts
The unroller will unroll the loop and the VRP2 pass will be present
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105170
Bug ID: 105170
Summary: Invalid finalization in intrinsic assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||92024
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is indeed missing logic to merge the side_effect and nondeterministic flag
while updating after inlining. I am testing the following
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.cc b/gcc/ipa-modref.cc
index acfd7d80ff8..5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52750|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105164
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Interestingly, I tried a build of gcc trunk with the new clang-14
and got many cases of this warning.
$ grep "warning:.*Wbitwise-instead-of-logical" mk.out | sort | uniq -c > /tmp/0
$ wc -l /tmp/0
16 /tmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, tree-ssa-alias is using:
if (ref_may_access_global_memory_p (ref))
to determine if the access to S9b.6_22 may be used by the call. I expected
this to return true because memory pointed to S9b.6_22 is es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
