https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |92024
Last reconfirmed| |2022-04-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC| |edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This was changed by the patch for PR92024. In the comment for that patch,
Bernd wrote "I think shadowing one type with another type of the same name is
always a no no" but then warns if either old or new decl is a type. I think a
type and a non-type can't really be considered compatible. Testing a patch.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92024
[Bug 92024] crash in check_local_shadow
