https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.1, 12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #17 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> >According to Intel (
> > https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide), there are no
> > alignment requirements for _mm_load_sd, _mm_store_sd an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103912
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
strap
--with-native-system-header-dir=/<>/glibc-2.33-117-dev/include
--prefix=/tmp/gb/__td__ CFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb3' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb3' LDFLAGS='-O1
-ggdb3'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220328 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105070
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105056
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50f9148f7a8daf1fa1608cb23595c3cca191da0f
commit r12-7840-g50f9148f7a8daf1fa1608cb23595c3cca191da0f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 105056, which changed state.
Bug 105056 Summary: [12 Regression] runtime error: load of value 3132799674,
which is not a valid value for type 'ref_step_type' since
r12-7795-g85b4d881327e31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
Bug ID: 105075
Summary: [nvptx] Generate sad insn (sum of absolute
differences)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105074
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105062
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> But since not all of the std::max are recognized as
> MAX_EXPR but some only after loop if-conversion
Ah, I hadn't noticed. I tried replacing std::max with a sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105076
Bug ID: 105076
Summary: [OpenMP] Weak/template functions: split-off
offload-region functions should also be weak
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 52693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52693&action=edit
Demonstrator patch
This patch adds:
- modeling of insn sad.u32 in the .md file
- peephole2 to generate it
(wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
AFAIU, at gimple level support is limited to vectors, so that doesn't help to
generate the insn for the simple, scalar case.
It would be nice if combine could generate it and we wouldn't have to use a
peepho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105066
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4352a0fee49441a32d12e8d8b98c425cfed4a86
commit r12-7841-ge4352a0fee49441a32d12e8d8b98c425cfed4a86
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105066
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52693|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
Bug ID: 105077
Summary: The std::bad_array_new_length is not thrown for some
new array scenarios.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99934
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
Bug ID: 105078
Summary: Maybe wrong *** buffer overflow detected ***:
terminated with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like a dup of PR 85795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85795
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Erroneous expressions include negative ones, as in PR 105077:
#include
#include
int main()
{
try
{
int negative = -1;
new char[negative];
}
catch(const std::bad_array_new_length &e)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85795
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chumarshal at foxmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105079
Bug ID: 105079
Summary: _mm_storeu_si16 inefficiently uses pextrw to an
integer reg (without SSE4.1)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105066
--- Comment #5 from Peter Cordes ---
> pextrw requires sse4.1 for mem operands.
You're right! I didn't double-check the asm manual for PEXTRW when writing up
the initial report, and had never realized that PINSRW wasn't symmetric with
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105070
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc86a86a4f2c057bc0e0be94dcbb8c128ae7f717
commit r12-7843-gbc86a86a4f2c057bc0e0be94dcbb8c128ae7f717
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105030
--- Comment #9 from HaoChen Gui ---
Escaped for 'atemp' doesn't be set with Fortran source code, while it's set
with C source code. 'auto_var_in_fn_p + pt_solution_includes' works for Fortran
code. But if the function is a head of the loop in Fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
--- Comment #3 from marshal ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I've added the first example there. The other two examples are exactly the
> same scenario.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 85795 ***
But w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105070
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105030
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105030
>
> --- Comment #9 from HaoChen Gui ---
> Escaped for 'atemp' doesn't be set with F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
@cindex @code{ssad@var{m}} instruction pattern
@item @samp{ssad@var{m}}
@cindex @code{usad@var{m}} instruction pattern
@item @samp{usad@var{m}}
Compute the sum of absolute differences of two signed/unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105080
Bug ID: 105080
Summary: Bugus -Wformat-truncation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105014
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Reproducer filed at https://github.com/vries/nvidia-bugs/tree/master/shift-and
PR filed at nvidia ( https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia_bug/3585290 ).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
--- Comment #1 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
With gcc12:
Computing maximum subobject size for _11:
Visiting use-def links for _11
Visiting use-def links for _10
Computing maximum object size for header_12:
Visiting use-def links for header_12
hea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to marshal from comment #3)
> But why "new int[negative];" throws std::bad_array_new_length as following
> case?
Because that case requires size_t(-1) * sizeof(int) and the compiler detects
that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105069
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-28
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> appears to be the difference, where the gcc11 version allows the full size
> (272) to be seen while the cast to QTypedArrayData in the latter allows only
> the sizeof (QTypedArrayData) to be seen as subobje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105074
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104450
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This changed with r12-2270-gdddb6ffdc5c25264dd75ad82dad8e48a0718d2d9
Before that commit it has been the forwprop2 pass that changed
_6 = &MEM[(struct QTypedArrayData *)header_8].D.2415;
_7 = _6 + 16;
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105081
Bug ID: 105081
Summary: Make std::random_device throw std::system_error
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105081
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36)
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > For gcc-12, is there a way to add a middle-end workaround using annotations
> > on
> > descr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15)
> One possibility would be to extend the patch Sandra posted at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-January/055563.html
> to scalarization.
As mentione
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52695
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52695&action=edit
gcc12-pr104985.patch
As I can't reproduce, just an untested patch, which will not keep around
addresses of reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 52695 [details]
> gcc12-pr104985.patch
>
> As I can't reproduce, just an untested patch, which will not keep around
> addresses of regno_reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52696
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52696&action=edit
gcc12-pr104985-2.patch
A variant patch, also untested, but much smaller.
Yet another way would be to change d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52697
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52697&action=edit
gcc12-pr104985-3.patch
And 3rd untested version, keep SUBST_MODE users as they are, but change
SUBST_MODE imp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think once gen_reg_rtx is called, we no longer overwrite regno_reg_rtx[regno]
but just modify it in place to change mode (except that we throw it away at the
end of RTL passes for each function), so I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.1
Summary|Bugus -Wform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 52698
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52698&action=edit
Demonstrator patch with stepping stone patterns for combine
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> Also,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105042
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #8 from Tom de V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105075
>
> --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
> Created attachment 52698
> --> https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104868
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105082
Bug ID: 105082
Summary: [OpenMP] [RFC] Add warning like LLVM's "declaration
marked as declare target after first use, it may lead
to incorrect results [-Wopenmp-target]" ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105083
Bug ID: 105083
Summary: scev_initialize should check for loop prerequesites
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104503
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07be8f8da4c6840a1fd6b2229b147e50cc6f03dc
commit r12-7848-g07be8f8da4c6840a1fd6b2229b147e50cc6f03dc
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07be8f8da4c6840a1fd6b2229b147e50cc6f03dc
commit r12-7848-g07be8f8da4c6840a1fd6b2229b147e50cc6f03dc
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71e1db540c01a13b01fae054c92878a79252b471
commit r12-7849-g71e1db540c01a13b01fae054c92878a79252b471
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102045
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72bdfcb848327020f62f72405d72cf85650666e1
commit r12-7850-g72bdfcb848327020f62f72405d72cf85650666e1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103943
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bc5cdaafa2e729f9209684dc30aa0acb72d2580
commit r12-7851-g8bc5cdaafa2e729f9209684dc30aa0acb72d2580
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103968
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7361eb36fa50307c9f7cfca36c9f58ce24f8f54
commit r12-7852-gc7361eb36fa50307c9f7cfca36c9f58ce24f8f54
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102123
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b854ce130ebbfdf2f882ef08538746030513b44b
commit r12-7853-gb854ce130ebbfdf2f882ef08538746030513b44b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8796eb27e24bd3340ebd393e96a94b91d09407e9
commit r12-7854-g8796eb27e24bd3340ebd393e96a94b91d09407e9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19b87a06482756739087283cd8b884cb3de693f9
commit r12-7855-g19b87a06482756739087283cd8b884cb3de693f9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105068
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a374915186ecab108c983a84b6afcede680100a4
commit r11-9701-ga374915186ecab108c983a84b6afcede680100a4
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104308
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:875342766d42988fa2f8eb7d34ef562ba69e340a
commit r12-7856-g875342766d42988fa2f8eb7d34ef562ba69e340a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104308
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105074
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from David Malc
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
