https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077
--- Comment #3 from marshal <chumarshal at foxmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I've added the first example there. The other two examples are exactly the
> same scenario.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 85795 ***
But why "new int[negative];" throws std::bad_array_new_length as following
case?
I think "new int[negative]" and "new char[negative]" should both throw
std::bad_array_new_length when "int negative = -1;".
new int[negative]
==========================================================================
#include <new>
#include <stdexcept>
int main()
{
int negative = -1;
new int[negative];
return 0;
}
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_array_new_length'
what(): std::bad_array_new_length
