[Bug c++/104139] [12 Regression] g++.dg/abi/no_unique_address2.C at r12-6028 (a37e8ce3b663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104139 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Target|

[Bug middle-end/104140] [12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression since r12-6434-g0752c75536e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/104114] vect.exp fails when run with -Wvector-operation-performance due to bogus diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104114 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/104114] vect.exp fails when run with -Wvector-operation-performance due to bogus diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104114 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad4188f8385f86cc04806fb0e26c7da1f5f655b8 commit r12-6755-gad4188f8385f86cc04806fb0e26c7da1f5f655b8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug other/102664] contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh uses echo -n, which isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102664 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug bootstrap/104135] [12 Regression] -Werror=format-diag breaks rtl checking bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104135 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104134] Bootstrap with --disable-nls compiling gcc/cp/error.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104134 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/104117] gcc10 fails to build icu for ppc64 on 10.5.8 (direct access to a floating-point constant)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- .. not (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) not enough coffee before posting ... [this problem comes into play when we use force_const_mem() on an operand,

[Bug c++/104142] New: [9/10/11/12] Spurios warning unused-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142 Bug ID: 104142 Summary: [9/10/11/12] Spurios warning unused-variable Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/104143] New: [F2018] Accept scalar actual arguments to assumed-type assumed-size array dummies [type(*), dimension(*)]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104143 Bug ID: 104143 Summary: [F2018] Accept scalar actual arguments to assumed-type assumed-size array dummies [type(*), dimension(*)] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/104142] Spurios warning unused-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12] Spurios|Spurios warning |war

[Bug tree-optimization/104058] [12 Regression] 6-7% x264_r regression with -march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto on x86 since r12-6420-gd3ff7420e941931d32ce2e332e7968fe67ba20af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104058 Levy Hsu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 104058, which changed state. Bug 104058 Summary: [12 Regression] 6-7% x264_r regression with -march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto on x86 since r12-6420-gd3ff7420e941931d32ce2e332e7968fe67ba20af https://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 104058, which changed state. Bug 104058 Summary: [12 Regression] 6-7% x264_r regression with -march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto on x86 since r12-6420-gd3ff7420e941931d32ce2e332e7968fe67ba20af https://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug target/103771] [12 Regression] Missed vectorization under -mavx512f -mavx512vl after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771 --- Comment #31 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bc700f4c3fbe405413db02281ef2918bfa831fc commit r12-6756-g8bc700f4c3fbe405413db02281ef2918bfa831fc Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Jan

[Bug tree-optimization/102650] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Actually e will not be used uninitialized for (; d < 1; d++) e = f + a; will initialize it since d is zero and its value will be 4. But jump threading isolates the case where we would access

[Bug fortran/102621] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op, at tree-nested.c:1166 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102621 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|--- Summary|[12 Regression]

[Bug fortran/102596] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_omp_clause_default_ctor, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:713 since r11-4883-ge929ef532ad52cde

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102596 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/104122] On Zen3, 510.parest_r (built with -Ofast) is faster with generic than with native ISA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104122 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > It's ISA, not tuning. You are of course correct, unfortunately I am too accustomed to using the wrong term. > I suppose -march=native -mtune=generic is still

[Bug tree-optimization/102540] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r12-476-gd846f225c25c5885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- I think the GCC 12 IL would require tracking equivalences on parts of registers, in this case that _2 is equal to the low part of a.0_1. That is, one would need to extend what CCP does with bit propagation

[Bug middle-end/102519] [12 Regression] VRP Jump threader memory explosion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102519 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #24 from Richard B

[Bug middle-end/102517] [12 regression] regressions on aarch64 since r12-3899

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/102489] [12 Regression] coroutines: ICE in is_this_parameter, at cp/semantics.c:11273 since r12-3529-g70ee703c479081ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102489 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/102473] [12 Regression] 521.wrf_r 5% slower at -Ofast and generic x86_64 tuning after r12-3426-g8f323c712ea76c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102459] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3549 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/102434] [11/12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r11-4547-g6fb7e3c29188ab7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102434 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/102433] [11/12 Regression] ICE in ~saved_token_sentinel, at cp/parser.c:1293 since r11-8118-g82198676c80764ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102433 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/102414] [12 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain, at cp/pt.c:23442 since r12-1933-ge66d0b7b87d105d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 --- Comment #11 from Stas Sergeev --- The third bug here seems to be that __asan_handle_no_return: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libsanitizer/asan/asan_rtl.cpp#L602 also calls sigaltstack() before unpoisoning stacks. I believe th

[Bug tree-optimization/102329] [11/12 Regression] pointer "maybe uninitialized" right after assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102329 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/102314] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1076 since r12-1319-gd4d38135b3137f1d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102314 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/102291] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong overflow warning for compound expression conversion and bit_and expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/102264] [9/10/11/12 Regression] extra spilling when using inline-asm and all registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102264 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52239 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52239&action=edit testcase with the constraints fixed I don't see how 4.9.4 "works", even that spills some regs. It does seem

[Bug fortran/104126] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at fortran/trans-expr.c:5649 since r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104126 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-20 Summary|ICE in

[Bug c++/102261] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in build_this_conversion) since r12-3346-g47543e5f9d1fc502

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/104127] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_array_charlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:7244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/104130] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_class_array_ref, at fortran/class.c:274 since r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org P

[Bug middle-end/104067] [12 Regression] wrong code compiling QEMU since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104067 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5) > I briefly looked at the other BZ last week, but didn't make much headway. > The first thing that stood out was why are we threading around the loop. I > thou

[Bug middle-end/104140] [12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression since r12-6434-g0752c75536e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104140 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/102058] [12 regression] 450.soplex regressed on x86_64 with -Ofast -march=generic (by 8-15%)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102058 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- It's all with generic arch/tune but -Ofast which is not the most interesting combination. But we should see to extract a testcase for the reduction and see to gather runtime data on the size() distribution

[Bug c/87983] Feature: Add a warning when case labels from a different enum than the one in switch(EXPR) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87983 --- Comment #4 from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > Is the expectation that this would come from -Wswitch, -Wswitch-enum, > -Wenum-compare, -Wenum-conversion, or some new flag? I think a new flag would b

[Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [9/10/11/12 Regression] regression built-in memset missed-optimization arm -Os since r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/104140] [12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression since r12-6434-g0752c75536e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104140 --- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle --- Ah. risv.md provides a usmulsidi3 expander that populates a usmul_widen_optab, performing a widening multiplication with operands of differing signs. The comment/documentation in tree.def needs to be updated

[Bug c++/101990] [12 Regression] ICE after parse error with concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101990 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/104122] On Zen3, 510.parest_r (built with -Ofast) is faster with generic than with native ISA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104122 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > I suppose -march=native -mtune=generic is still bad? > > I don't know, I'd have to manually check. > It tur

[Bug debug/103874] [11/12 Regression] ICE in internal_error on riscv64 and -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103874 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f03ac49cb4f585dbce78dc9e4c4a9ec950e83c commit r12-6758-g68f03ac49cb4f585dbce78dc9e4c4a9ec950e83c Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug debug/103874] [11 Regression] ICE in internal_error on riscv64 and -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103874 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jakub at redhat dot com| Summary|[11/12 Regre

[Bug middle-end/104140] [12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in binary expression since r12-6434-g0752c75536e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104140 --- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle --- Sorry for the noise, but interestingly riscv.md also defines a usmulsi3_highpart instruction, providing highpart multiplication with different operand signedness. So in theory an alternate fix might be to allo

[Bug bootstrap/104135] [12 Regression] -Werror=format-diag breaks rtl checking bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104135 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e744aa373d215d1e8b3f4102a71b26b385dababc commit r12-6759-ge744aa373d215d1e8b3f4102a71b26b385dababc Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug c++/104134] Bootstrap with --disable-nls compiling gcc/cp/error.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104134 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d51a27fb17d9dc4e583c119fd976d39e575180f commit r12-6760-g6d51a27fb17d9dc4e583c119fd976d39e575180f Author: Martin Liska Date: Th

[Bug c++/104134] Bootstrap with --disable-nls compiling gcc/cp/error.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104134 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/104135] [12 Regression] -Werror=format-diag breaks rtl checking bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104135 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101908] [12 regression] cray regression with -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize compared to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- No good idea how to tackle such issues. Possibly a mdreorg pass could for the code region "near" to the function prologue scan for loads that are known to access the arguments in a way conflicting with ho

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez --- The testcase for PR104067 shows an example where the dominance matters, irregardless of if we reset relations at the backedge point. There we have a path that looks like 9->3->5->...: [local count: 106

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 52240 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52240&action=edit proposed untested patch This is a proposed patch that fixes both PRs. Perhaps we can tweak the dominance ch

[Bug target/101908] [12 regression] cray regression with -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize compared to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|tree-optimizatio

[Bug target/101908] [12 regression] cray regression with -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize compared to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- #include struct X { double x[3]; }; typedef double v2df __attribute__((vector_size(16))); v2df __attribute__((noipa)) foo (struct X x) { return (v2df) {x.x[1], x.x[2] }; } struct X y; int main(int ar

[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxue at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug other/102664] contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh uses echo -n, which isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102664 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/103655] "x" does not exist on windows and dos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103655 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- "We implemented this C11 feature a while ago and backported it to all OSes" That suggests it should become available everywhere, no?

[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug web/104144] New: [12 Regression] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 Bug ID: 104144 Summary: [12 Regression] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a' Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNC

[Bug web/104144] [12 Regression] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101882] [9/10/11/12 Regression] modulus with input and output set to a hard register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101882 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/104144] [12 Regression] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|web |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/101874] [12 Regression] ICE with auto specifier for VLAs since r12-1933-ge66d0b7b87d105d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101874 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/104144] [12 Regression] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/101662] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91446.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/101630] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wall: in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/101532] [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/101500] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc accepts the code with extra curly braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101500 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/102664] contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh uses echo -n, which isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102664 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Limitations-of-Usual-Tools.html#index-g_t_0040command_007bexpr_007d-1813 The expr match regex should not start with ^ (that is implied

[Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 regression] |/usr/local/include/libgccji

[Bug c/101478] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE on invalid code: recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101478 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/104144] [12 Regression] build fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] |[12 Regression] build fails

[Bug target/101428] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: 'asm' clobber conflict with output operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/101150] [11/12 Regression] null pointer dereference false positive disappears when compiling an additional function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101150 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-06-22 00:00:00 |2022-1-20 Known to work|

[Bug c++/101051] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in splice_late_return_type with trailing return type on a conversion operator, caused by r10-6571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug preprocessor/100904] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong line location #include error "No such file or directory" – line + 1 [traditional mode as used by gfortran]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-06-08 00:00:00 |2022-1-20 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/100853] [11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:4148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100853 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/100829] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with type that can't be determined since r8-6321-gd78201d30c7c5a8f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100829 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/104145] New: Extra instructions generated for dual float return on ARM64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104145 Bug ID: 104145 Summary: Extra instructions generated for dual float return on ARM64. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/104145] Extra instructions generated for dual float return on ARM64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104145 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be a dup of this bug already.

[Bug middle-end/104145] Extra instructions generated for dual float return on ARM64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104145 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug testsuite/104146] New: FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/pr96390.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104146 Bug ID: 104146 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/pr96390.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/104146] FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/pr96390.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104146 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Adding: ... /* { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 97102/PR 97106 - .alias not (yet) supported for nvptx" { offload_target_nvptx } } */ ... fixes the FAIL.

[Bug target/101428] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: 'asm' clobber conflict with output operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Was this ever working or why is this > marked as regression? gcc 9 and earlier accept the code w/o any diagnostic, and AFAICT the snippet you quoted had been

[Bug middle-end/104067] [12 Regression] wrong code compiling QEMU since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104067 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org --- Comment #13

[Bug middle-end/100786] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc with alias attribute and different types and different sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/100784] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char const*, int, char const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug target/104144] [12 Regression] build fails due to: Error: unknown architecture `armv9-a'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104144 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- This sort of problem is going to keep occurring while we continue to have separate distributions of GCC and binutils. There's no way around the fact that support for a new architecture in GCC needs an as

[Bug c/100661] [11/12 Regression] ICE in omp-low.c / refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Can lambdas appear inside #pragma omp in C++? The following is accepted but each thread seems to get the global 'c', but at least we don't ICE (possibly because frame lowering is done in the FE). void foo

[Bug c/100661] [11/12 Regression] ICE in omp-low.c / refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Ah, no, for the C++ example c[50] is local to _Z3fooPPc._omp_fn.0 and thus likely fine.

[Bug c++/101405] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6483

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101405 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/100661] [11/12 Regression] ICE in omp-low.c / refs_may_alias_p_2, at tree-ssa-alias.c:2460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Can lambdas appear inside #pragma omp in C++? Since OpenMP 5.0 yes. Well, they could appear before as well, but OpenMP 4.5 didn't support C++11, so it wasn't

  1   2   3   >