https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In the ipa-cp dump it even mentions it:
Node: encode_block/0:
param [0]: &block2 [loc_time: 0, loc_size: 0, prop_time: 0, prop_size: 0]
ctxs: VARIABLE
Bits: value = 0x0, mask = 0xfffffffffffffffc
int[256] * [1B, +INF]
AGGS VARIABLE
param [1]: VARIABLE
5 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 760193,
prop_size: 216]
4 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 143948,
prop_size: 189]
3 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 31125.7,
prop_size: 162]
2 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 7822.76,
prop_size: 135]
1 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 2325.83,
prop_size: 108]
0 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 825.122,
prop_size: 81]
4294967295 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 342.227,
prop_size: 54]
4294967294 [loc_time: 147.512, loc_size: 27, prop_time: 147.512,
prop_size: 27]
ctxs: VARIABLE
Bits unusable (BOTTOM)
unsigned int [0, 4294967294]
AGGS VARIABLE
but doesn't connect that when the param has value range of [0, 4294967294] and
4294967295
is outside of that range, it doesn't make sense to specialize on it.
