https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103849
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 77811, which changed state.
Bug 77811 Summary: [concepts] invalid redefinition error when declaring friend
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77811
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomas.zencak at seznam dot cz
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dangelog at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael at espindo dot la
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 95368, which changed state.
Bug 95368 Summary: gcc things that a lambda capture is both const and mutable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103842
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:242783c52c22ed96eae722b2fa9847711ac84699
commit r12-6129-g242783c52c22ed96eae722b2fa9847711ac84699
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
thanks for your analysis; the problem is indeed clear. I have some work in
progress that I expect to produce for a fix for this - it is just a question of
finding time to progress it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a187edd2b437fc9571d57f771a624963fcce08f8
commit r12-6131-ga187edd2b437fc9571d57f771a624963fcce08f8
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103850
Bug ID: 103850
Summary: missed optimization in AVX code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103850
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103850
--- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke ---
Thanks! This flag indeed causes both kernels to have the same speed, but (at
least for me) it's slower than both original versions...
slow kernel version: 29.027915 GFlops/s
fast kernel version: 29.008313
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103834
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The inline part of the template variable does not make a difference.
Reduced testcase:
template char hh= 0;
static_assert(&hh<0> != &hh<1>, "should not be equal");
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94716
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bluescarni at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 94716, which changed state.
Bug 94716 Summary: comparison of address of template variables should be
constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94716
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103850
--- Comment #3 from Martin Reinecke ---
Just for completeness, this is the CPU I'm running on:
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 23
model : 96
model name : AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with Radeon Graphics
stepping: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103834
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 103834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103836
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jorg.brown at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 91693, which changed state.
Bug 91693 Summary: Comparing addresses of templated inline vars gets bogus "not
a constant expression" error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #1)
> Also rejected as non-constant comparison.
That is a different issue and was fixed for GCC 10.3.0 and GCC 11+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
For the first testcase, here is a reduced testcase:
template char hh= 0;
static_assert(&hh<0> != &hh<1>, "should not be equal");
- CUT
Note the above is even valid C++14.
And here is the reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103821
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88602
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
In addition to Skia, Firefox gfx library now contains more clang specific
vector code:
gfx/wr/swgl/src/vector_type.h
control vector implementation of some shader rountines (seen in the
rasterflood-gradient be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Andrew Burgess from comment #0)
> + This bug report has a bit of history. Originally there was a GCC
> patch here:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715
--- Comment #15 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
clang's compiler-rt fails to build for quite a while due to this ICE.
Trying to poke at the failure. I shrunk the example slightly further:
template struct S {
S & bar() noexcept(A::value);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Bug ID: 103851
Summary: ICE in gimple_range_global at gcc/value-query.cc:424
since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78ee8381bf0ebd09a92936bdb9e1b5c9fc85ad88
commit r12-6133-g78ee8381bf0ebd09a92936bdb9e1b5c9fc85ad88
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c5fd3616f73fbcd241cc3a5e09275c2b0c49bd4
commit r12-6134-g3c5fd3616f73fbcd241cc3a5e09275c2b0c49bd4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9258ac53cfcbe546e8b86a433e59343538743f74
commit r12-6135-g9258ac53cfcbe546e8b86a433e59343538743f74
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|'-fc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Crash in |[11 Regression] Crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 52078 [details]
> gcc12-pr103742.patch
>
> Untested fix that fixes it in the r12-6030 tree.
Thank you for the patch. It fixes both the reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99968
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db25655fa5dd23bba684ec7db628643c19e64d6a
commit r12-6136-gdb25655fa5dd23bba684ec7db628643c19e64d6a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
There don't seem to be any sparc64-linux machines in the GCC compile farm, so I
can't recreate this myself.
Are you able to recreate the problem while running under gdb? A backtrace from
the point of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93645
--- Comment #15 from Fangrui Song ---
-- is definitely rare, but not non-existent.
In GCC, there is {-,--}specs.
In Clang, there are --cuda-path, --ptxas-path, --hip-path, --classpath, etc.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14)
> >
> > I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Bug ID: 103852
Summary: Alias template argument deduction is available in
C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103802
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Alexander von Gluck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853
Bug ID: 103853
Summary: std::forward_list::merge should check if __list !=
this
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger ---
While there are certainly empty subranges that could be avoided,
there are also completely empty subroutines, which cannot be
avoided without losing the ability to inspect the procedure
variable at this loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is an even more reduced testcase:
struct _Deque_base {
long _M_map_size;
int *_M_start;
int *_M_finish;
};
void morphologicalFilter1D() {
#pragma omp parallel
{
struct _Deque_base vals[4];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103854
Bug ID: 103854
Summary: ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at
fortran/class.c:1618
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |c
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> I can reproduce it even with 9.3, 10.1 and 11.1.
> On the other side, on the bisect-seed box I can't reproduce, strange.
Even on godbolt I can only reproduce it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase which clang accepts but GCC rejects:
int b;
int e;
#define a(...) b /##__VA_OPT__(c) e
int y = a();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-28
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0
Target Milestone|11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-02 00:00:00 |2021-12-28
Target Milestone|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v.barinov at samsung dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101974
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* This is a request to merge an internal specification for
a function declaration involving arrays but no explicit
attribute access. */
tree vblist = TREE_CHAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85047
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #5 from matoro ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #4)
> There don't seem to be any sparc64-linux machines in the GCC compile farm,
> so I can't recreate this myself.
>
> Are you able to recreate the problem while running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 97992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103793
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44372676e81358de29d5c853685a7664a95d8a96
commit r12-6140-g44372676e81358de29d5c853685a7664a95d8a96
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103793
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo