https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> --- (In reply to Andrew Burgess from comment #0) > + This bug report has a bit of history. Originally there was a GCC > patch here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html > and a reply here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html > > This led to a GDB patch here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html > which in turn led to a different GDB patch (adding is-stmt > support), here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html > one correction here: the reply to the oct 2019 patch was here: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01771.html The follow up GDB patch probably this one is meant: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-November/162747.html The different patch adding is-stmt probably this one is meant: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-December/164224.html
