https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
A simple workaround is to add at the begining of the function:
if (level == 0) return 0;
What I found is since we don't run loop copy header until after IPA-CP, we get
some interesting IR where we don't jum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su ---
Hi Richard, I just noticed that this issue was mis-categorized as a duplicate
of 102920, which was filed later. It's not very important, but it would
probably be nice to correctly label the issues in the bug t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103389
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE:|[12 Regression] ICE:
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
@Anlauf: Heh, you fixed faster than I made bisection :P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103402
Bug ID: 103402
Summary: Compile-time less/more comparison of a pointer vs
nullptr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103389
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103345
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04eccbbe3d9a4e9d2f8f43dba8ac4cb686029fb2
commit r12-5492-g04eccbbe3d9a4e9d2f8f43dba8ac4cb686029fb2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04eccbbe3d9a4e9d2f8f43dba8ac4cb686029fb2
commit r12-5492-g04eccbbe3d9a4e9d2f8f43dba8ac4cb686029fb2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103365
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:709716b9f49f2fcf46f319000562cf6e61bd2f71
commit r12-5493-g709716b9f49f2fcf46f319000562cf6e61bd2f71
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103365
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103340
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Making the others work isn't difficult.
HA!
Making them usable in constexpr wasn't difficult, but analysing the test
results and realising that they're com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103384
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bca26742cf3357bf4e20ec97eee4c7f7de17ce0
commit r12-5494-g5bca26742cf3357bf4e20ec97eee4c7f7de17ce0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403
Bug ID: 103403
Summary: Decltype of rvalue reference
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, in qemu it isn't just those newlines but simply a long inline asm.
It can very well be something that is empty or very short in the .text section,
e.g. can .pushsection; .section whatever; put lots of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc accepts |[11/12 Regression] gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211124 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is a totally different issue and unrelated issue from PR 78209
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103340
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 51866
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51866&action=edit
Make all allocator base classes constexpr
This patch would make bitmap_allocator, __mt_alloc and __pool_allo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103193
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9ca2ca381e44a332703155d07b50b84aa21f80d
commit r12-5495-gd9ca2ca381e44a332703155d07b50b84aa21f80d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug ID: 103405
Summary: [12 Regression] c67005c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
DSE removes a few stores even though they are used in the check.
_18 = .gnat_malloc (4);
MEM[(integer *)_18] = 1; ;; this one
FRAME.2.i = _18;
_17 = .gnat_malloc (4);
MEM[(integer *)_17] = 0; ;; t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x028071dc in insert_with_costs (x=0x76739090, classp=0x0,
hash=13, mode=E_SImode, cost=0, reg_cost=1)
at /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdd34569e7a9fc2b6c638a7ef62b965ed7e832ce
commit r12-5498-gfdd34569e7a9fc2b6c638a7ef62b965ed7e832ce
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
C testcase:
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
void *malloc(size_t);
static inline int *starter(int a)
{
int *b = malloc(sizeof(int));
*b = a;
return b;
}
static inline _Bool equal(int *l, int *r)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Bug ID: 103406
Summary: gcc -O0 behaves differently on "DBL_MAX related
operations" than gcc -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103244
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|[12 regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is interesting.
The trunk does 0.0 for both -O0 and -O1.
ICC also does 0.0 for both -O0 and -O1 and -0.0 for -O2.
clang does -nan for -O1, -O2 and -O0
MSVC does nan for /O2 and /O1 (7ff8) a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
gcc/libgcc/config/i386/sfp-machine.h says:
/* Here is something Intel misdesigned: the specs don't define
the case where we have two NaNs with same mantissas, but
different sign. Different operations pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103404
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, the trunk is constant folding (maybe wrong?).
We used to get for 11.1.0:
_1 = 1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308 *
2.0e+0;
_2 = 1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6180f5c8d6d1dc7b6634c41a46f0f8f5ca2e5b9d
commit r12-5499-g6180f5c8d6d1dc7b6634c41a46f0f8f5ca2e5b9d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103086
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa1ea255dba2d44ff22e434ed3d7778e8aaf4b91
commit r11-9275-gfa1ea255dba2d44ff22e434ed3d7778e8aaf4b91
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:176e55cc28a61b7b246bd9e16ffeaa31367a8985
commit r11-9277-g176e55cc28a61b7b246bd9e16ffeaa31367a8985
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:176e55cc28a61b7b246bd9e16ffeaa31367a8985
commit r11-9277-g176e55cc28a61b7b246bd9e16ffeaa31367a8985
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c04b0f63243d4d474daa66f84874ebf6b9e7b0cd
commit r11-9281-gc04b0f63243d4d474daa66f84874ebf6b9e7b0cd
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98421
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:238fd13380838ad57d199f3e9ca1d5403f33d381
commit r11-9291-g238fd13380838ad57d199f3e9ca1d5403f33d381
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102894
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88d481c9ee1e6a24dc11ab56d8688308e0211855
commit r11-9293-g88d481c9ee1e6a24dc11ab56d8688308e0211855
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecc43c92151141e3e862a344f753516dc6d5d967
commit r11-9295-gecc43c92151141e3e862a344f753516dc6d5d967
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98421
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
commit r11-9301-g293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103133
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
commit r11-9301-g293075002a7eaf1e9d457a1839bcaf83f8626824
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103133
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
Bug ID: 103407
Summary: [12 regression] abi_check FAILs on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
We are folding
(1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308 * 2.0e+0) -
(1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308 * 2.0e+0)
to 0.0 via
(simplify
(minus @0 @0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc -O0 behaves differently |[12 Regression] gcc -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I suspect the best we're likely to be able to do is to downgrade the ICE into
an error if there's a long inline ASM in the code, much like the way we handle
invalid constraints in inline ASMs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk. It can't be backported without also backporting r12-1068 to fix
PR100368.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That will still mean qemu will not compile.
I admit I know next to nothing about the arm minipool stuff, but can't whatever
needs to be inserted be inserted either before or after the inline asm, if it
is ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103396
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> * something else
This one! :-)
Patrick is in the process of replacing my janky std::from_chars implementation
with something faster and more standards-conformi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor ---
Some testing is still underway, but I have proposed the patch (with one minor
testsuite change) on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585337.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
And the -nan vs. nan is because we fold x + -y to x - y:
/* We can't reassociate at all for saturating types. */
(if (!TYPE_SATURATING (type))
/* Contract negates. */
/* A + (-B) -> A - B */
(simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
simplify_binary_operation_1 has
/* ((-a) + b) -> (b - a) and similarly for (a + (-b)). These
transformations are safe even for IEEE. */
if (GET_CODE (op0) == NEG)
return simp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
It depends on the the reference. Some minipool references can only be forwards
due to the nature of the instruction making the reference. I'll need to take a
look, and I might also need a real testcase,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103406
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51867&action=edit
qemuice.i.xz
Unreduced preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103059
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29e1cbdc0c6e7d3de10478ef2b881900545c2a55
commit r12-5500-g29e1cbdc0c6e7d3de10478ef2b881900545c2a55
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103059
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78421afafde5156d6d4c6c7073653e4b92f88e3d
commit r11-9306-g78421afafde5156d6d4c6c7073653e4b92f88e3d
Author: Maciej W. R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103059
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> It isn't the vectorizer but memmove inline expansion. I'm not sure it's
> really a bug, but there isn't a way to disable %ymm use besides disabling
> AVX entirely.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92145
--- Comment #3 from Nikita Kniazev ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> Fixed?
It is fixed on trunk but still presented in every release (since the fix landed
9.4 and 11.2 were released). I assume it was not backported, could you pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103231
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5deacf6058d1bc7261a75c9fd1f116c4442e9e60
commit r12-5505-g5deacf6058d1bc7261a75c9fd1f116c4442e9e60
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103231
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
--- Comment #10 from Roger Sayle ---
Many thanks to Jakub for the speedy fix (and Richard B for the speedy review),
and my apologies for the inconvenience. As diagnosed by Jakub, I hadn't
realized that the bswap pass was performing additional o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103401
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
